Imaging of the midpalatal suture in a porcine model

Standard

Imaging of the midpalatal suture in a porcine model : flat-panel volume computed tomography compared with multislice computed tomography. / Hahn, Wolfram; Fricke-Zech, Susanne; Fialka-Fricke, Julia; Dullin, Christian; Zapf, Antonia; Gruber, Rudolf; Sennhenn-kirchner, Sabine; Kubein-Meesenburg, Dietmar; Sadat-Khonsari, Reza.

in: ORAL SURG ORAL MED O, Jahrgang 108, Nr. 3, 09.2009, S. 443-449.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Hahn, W, Fricke-Zech, S, Fialka-Fricke, J, Dullin, C, Zapf, A, Gruber, R, Sennhenn-kirchner, S, Kubein-Meesenburg, D & Sadat-Khonsari, R 2009, 'Imaging of the midpalatal suture in a porcine model: flat-panel volume computed tomography compared with multislice computed tomography', ORAL SURG ORAL MED O, Jg. 108, Nr. 3, S. 443-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.02.034

APA

Hahn, W., Fricke-Zech, S., Fialka-Fricke, J., Dullin, C., Zapf, A., Gruber, R., Sennhenn-kirchner, S., Kubein-Meesenburg, D., & Sadat-Khonsari, R. (2009). Imaging of the midpalatal suture in a porcine model: flat-panel volume computed tomography compared with multislice computed tomography. ORAL SURG ORAL MED O, 108(3), 443-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.02.034

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{29112284225a4dc588235d415e41107b,
title = "Imaging of the midpalatal suture in a porcine model: flat-panel volume computed tomography compared with multislice computed tomography",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: An investigation was conducted to compare the image quality of prototype flat-panel volume computed tomography (fpVCT) and multislice computed tomography (MSCT) of suture structures.STUDY DESIGN: Bone samples were taken from the midpalatal suture of 5 young (16 weeks) and 5 old (200 weeks) Sus scrofa domestica and fixed in formalin solution. An fpVCT prototype and an MSCT were used to obtain images of the specimens. The facial reformations were assessed by 4 observers using a 1 (excellent) to 5 (poor) rating scale for the weighted criteria visualization of the suture structure. A linear mixed model was used for statistical analysis. Results with P < .05 were considered to be statistically significant.RESULTS: The visualization of the suture of young specimens was significantly better than that of older animals (P < .001). The visualization of the suture with fpVCT was significantly better than that with MSCT (P < .001).CONCLUSION: Compared with MSCT, fpVCT produces superior results in the visualization of the midpalatal suture in a Sus scrofa domestica model.",
keywords = "Age Factors, Animals, Cranial Sutures, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Models, Animal, Palate, Hard, Radiographic Image Enhancement, Swine, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Comparative Study, Journal Article",
author = "Wolfram Hahn and Susanne Fricke-Zech and Julia Fialka-Fricke and Christian Dullin and Antonia Zapf and Rudolf Gruber and Sabine Sennhenn-kirchner and Dietmar Kubein-Meesenburg and Reza Sadat-Khonsari",
year = "2009",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.02.034",
language = "English",
volume = "108",
pages = "443--449",
journal = "ORAL SURG ORAL MED O",
issn = "1079-2104",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Imaging of the midpalatal suture in a porcine model

T2 - flat-panel volume computed tomography compared with multislice computed tomography

AU - Hahn, Wolfram

AU - Fricke-Zech, Susanne

AU - Fialka-Fricke, Julia

AU - Dullin, Christian

AU - Zapf, Antonia

AU - Gruber, Rudolf

AU - Sennhenn-kirchner, Sabine

AU - Kubein-Meesenburg, Dietmar

AU - Sadat-Khonsari, Reza

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - OBJECTIVE: An investigation was conducted to compare the image quality of prototype flat-panel volume computed tomography (fpVCT) and multislice computed tomography (MSCT) of suture structures.STUDY DESIGN: Bone samples were taken from the midpalatal suture of 5 young (16 weeks) and 5 old (200 weeks) Sus scrofa domestica and fixed in formalin solution. An fpVCT prototype and an MSCT were used to obtain images of the specimens. The facial reformations were assessed by 4 observers using a 1 (excellent) to 5 (poor) rating scale for the weighted criteria visualization of the suture structure. A linear mixed model was used for statistical analysis. Results with P < .05 were considered to be statistically significant.RESULTS: The visualization of the suture of young specimens was significantly better than that of older animals (P < .001). The visualization of the suture with fpVCT was significantly better than that with MSCT (P < .001).CONCLUSION: Compared with MSCT, fpVCT produces superior results in the visualization of the midpalatal suture in a Sus scrofa domestica model.

AB - OBJECTIVE: An investigation was conducted to compare the image quality of prototype flat-panel volume computed tomography (fpVCT) and multislice computed tomography (MSCT) of suture structures.STUDY DESIGN: Bone samples were taken from the midpalatal suture of 5 young (16 weeks) and 5 old (200 weeks) Sus scrofa domestica and fixed in formalin solution. An fpVCT prototype and an MSCT were used to obtain images of the specimens. The facial reformations were assessed by 4 observers using a 1 (excellent) to 5 (poor) rating scale for the weighted criteria visualization of the suture structure. A linear mixed model was used for statistical analysis. Results with P < .05 were considered to be statistically significant.RESULTS: The visualization of the suture of young specimens was significantly better than that of older animals (P < .001). The visualization of the suture with fpVCT was significantly better than that with MSCT (P < .001).CONCLUSION: Compared with MSCT, fpVCT produces superior results in the visualization of the midpalatal suture in a Sus scrofa domestica model.

KW - Age Factors

KW - Animals

KW - Cranial Sutures

KW - Image Processing, Computer-Assisted

KW - Models, Animal

KW - Palate, Hard

KW - Radiographic Image Enhancement

KW - Swine

KW - Tomography, X-Ray Computed

KW - Comparative Study

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.02.034

DO - 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.02.034

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 19464211

VL - 108

SP - 443

EP - 449

JO - ORAL SURG ORAL MED O

JF - ORAL SURG ORAL MED O

SN - 1079-2104

IS - 3

ER -