Hyperscanning: A Valid Method to Study Neural Inter-brain Underpinnings of Social Interaction
Standard
Hyperscanning: A Valid Method to Study Neural Inter-brain Underpinnings of Social Interaction. / Czeszumski, Artur; Eustergerling, Sara; Lang, Anne; Menrath, David; Gerstenberger, Michael; Schuberth, Susanne; Schreiber, Felix; Rendon, Zadkiel Zuluaga; König, Peter.
in: FRONT HUM NEUROSCI, Jahrgang 14, 2020, S. 39.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Review › Forschung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Hyperscanning: A Valid Method to Study Neural Inter-brain Underpinnings of Social Interaction
AU - Czeszumski, Artur
AU - Eustergerling, Sara
AU - Lang, Anne
AU - Menrath, David
AU - Gerstenberger, Michael
AU - Schuberth, Susanne
AU - Schreiber, Felix
AU - Rendon, Zadkiel Zuluaga
AU - König, Peter
N1 - Copyright © 2020 Czeszumski, Eustergerling, Lang, Menrath, Gerstenberger, Schuberth, Schreiber, Rendon and König.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Social interactions are a crucial part of human life. Understanding the neural underpinnings of social interactions is a challenging task that the hyperscanning method has been trying to tackle over the last two decades. Here, we review the existing literature and evaluate the current state of the hyperscanning method. We review the type of methods (fMRI, M/EEG, and fNIRS) that are used to measure brain activity from more than one participant simultaneously and weigh their pros and cons for hyperscanning. Further, we discuss different types of analyses that are used to estimate brain networks and synchronization. Lastly, we present results of hyperscanning studies in the context of different cognitive functions and their relations to social interactions. All in all, we aim to comprehensively present methods, analyses, and results from the last 20 years of hyperscanning research.
AB - Social interactions are a crucial part of human life. Understanding the neural underpinnings of social interactions is a challenging task that the hyperscanning method has been trying to tackle over the last two decades. Here, we review the existing literature and evaluate the current state of the hyperscanning method. We review the type of methods (fMRI, M/EEG, and fNIRS) that are used to measure brain activity from more than one participant simultaneously and weigh their pros and cons for hyperscanning. Further, we discuss different types of analyses that are used to estimate brain networks and synchronization. Lastly, we present results of hyperscanning studies in the context of different cognitive functions and their relations to social interactions. All in all, we aim to comprehensively present methods, analyses, and results from the last 20 years of hyperscanning research.
U2 - 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00039
DO - 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00039
M3 - SCORING: Review article
C2 - 32180710
VL - 14
SP - 39
JO - FRONT HUM NEUROSCI
JF - FRONT HUM NEUROSCI
SN - 1662-5161
ER -