How well do standard stroke outcome measures reflect quality of life? A retrospective analysis of clinical trial data

Standard

How well do standard stroke outcome measures reflect quality of life? A retrospective analysis of clinical trial data. / Ali, Myzoon; Fulton, Rachael; Quinn, Terry; Brady, Marian; VISTA Collaboration.

in: STROKE, Jahrgang 44, Nr. 11, 01.11.2013, S. 3161-5.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{7de61c445f704afeade06477e62f875b,
title = "How well do standard stroke outcome measures reflect quality of life? A retrospective analysis of clinical trial data",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Quality of life (QoL) is important to stroke survivors yet is often recorded as a secondary measure in acute stroke randomized controlled trials. We examined whether commonly used stroke outcome measures captured aspects of QoL.METHODS: We examined primary outcomes by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Barthel Index (BI) and modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and QoL by Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) and European Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive (VISTA). Using Spearman correlations and logistic regression, we described the relationships between QoL mRS, NIHSS, and BI at 3 months, stratified by respondent (patient or proxy). Using χ2 analyses, we examined the mismatch between good primary outcome (mRS ≤1, NIHSS ≤5, or BI ≥95) but poor QoL, and poor primary outcome (mRS ≥3, NIHSS ≥20, or BI ≤60) but good QoL.RESULTS: Patient-assessed QoL had a stronger association with mRS (EQ-5D weighted score n=2987, P<0.0001, r=-0.7, r2=0.53; SIS recovery n=2970, P<0.0001, r=-0.71, r2=0.52). Proxy responses had a stronger association with BI (EQ-5D weighted score n=837, P<0.0001, r=0.78, r2=0.63; SIS recovery n=867, P<0.0001, r=0.68, r2=0.48). mRS explained more of the variation in QoL (EQ-5D weighted score=53%, recovery by SIS v3.0=52%) than NIHSS or BI and resulted in fewer mismatches between good primary outcome and poor QoL (P<0.0001, EQ-5D weighted score=8.5%; SIS recovery=10%; SIS-16=4.4%).CONCLUSIONS: The mRS seemed to align closely with stroke survivors' interests, capturing more information on QoL than either NIHSS or BI. This further supports its recommendation as a primary outcome measure in acute stroke randomized controlled trials.",
keywords = "Aged, Clinical Trials as Topic, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Humans, International Cooperation, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Quality of Life, Questionnaires, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Research Design, Retrospective Studies, Stroke, Treatment Outcome",
author = "Myzoon Ali and Rachael Fulton and Terry Quinn and Marian Brady and {VISTA Collaboration} and G{\"o}tz Thomalla",
year = "2013",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001126",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "3161--5",
journal = "STROKE",
issn = "0039-2499",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How well do standard stroke outcome measures reflect quality of life? A retrospective analysis of clinical trial data

AU - Ali, Myzoon

AU - Fulton, Rachael

AU - Quinn, Terry

AU - Brady, Marian

AU - VISTA Collaboration

AU - Thomalla, Götz

PY - 2013/11/1

Y1 - 2013/11/1

N2 - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Quality of life (QoL) is important to stroke survivors yet is often recorded as a secondary measure in acute stroke randomized controlled trials. We examined whether commonly used stroke outcome measures captured aspects of QoL.METHODS: We examined primary outcomes by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Barthel Index (BI) and modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and QoL by Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) and European Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive (VISTA). Using Spearman correlations and logistic regression, we described the relationships between QoL mRS, NIHSS, and BI at 3 months, stratified by respondent (patient or proxy). Using χ2 analyses, we examined the mismatch between good primary outcome (mRS ≤1, NIHSS ≤5, or BI ≥95) but poor QoL, and poor primary outcome (mRS ≥3, NIHSS ≥20, or BI ≤60) but good QoL.RESULTS: Patient-assessed QoL had a stronger association with mRS (EQ-5D weighted score n=2987, P<0.0001, r=-0.7, r2=0.53; SIS recovery n=2970, P<0.0001, r=-0.71, r2=0.52). Proxy responses had a stronger association with BI (EQ-5D weighted score n=837, P<0.0001, r=0.78, r2=0.63; SIS recovery n=867, P<0.0001, r=0.68, r2=0.48). mRS explained more of the variation in QoL (EQ-5D weighted score=53%, recovery by SIS v3.0=52%) than NIHSS or BI and resulted in fewer mismatches between good primary outcome and poor QoL (P<0.0001, EQ-5D weighted score=8.5%; SIS recovery=10%; SIS-16=4.4%).CONCLUSIONS: The mRS seemed to align closely with stroke survivors' interests, capturing more information on QoL than either NIHSS or BI. This further supports its recommendation as a primary outcome measure in acute stroke randomized controlled trials.

AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Quality of life (QoL) is important to stroke survivors yet is often recorded as a secondary measure in acute stroke randomized controlled trials. We examined whether commonly used stroke outcome measures captured aspects of QoL.METHODS: We examined primary outcomes by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Barthel Index (BI) and modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and QoL by Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) and European Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive (VISTA). Using Spearman correlations and logistic regression, we described the relationships between QoL mRS, NIHSS, and BI at 3 months, stratified by respondent (patient or proxy). Using χ2 analyses, we examined the mismatch between good primary outcome (mRS ≤1, NIHSS ≤5, or BI ≥95) but poor QoL, and poor primary outcome (mRS ≥3, NIHSS ≥20, or BI ≤60) but good QoL.RESULTS: Patient-assessed QoL had a stronger association with mRS (EQ-5D weighted score n=2987, P<0.0001, r=-0.7, r2=0.53; SIS recovery n=2970, P<0.0001, r=-0.71, r2=0.52). Proxy responses had a stronger association with BI (EQ-5D weighted score n=837, P<0.0001, r=0.78, r2=0.63; SIS recovery n=867, P<0.0001, r=0.68, r2=0.48). mRS explained more of the variation in QoL (EQ-5D weighted score=53%, recovery by SIS v3.0=52%) than NIHSS or BI and resulted in fewer mismatches between good primary outcome and poor QoL (P<0.0001, EQ-5D weighted score=8.5%; SIS recovery=10%; SIS-16=4.4%).CONCLUSIONS: The mRS seemed to align closely with stroke survivors' interests, capturing more information on QoL than either NIHSS or BI. This further supports its recommendation as a primary outcome measure in acute stroke randomized controlled trials.

KW - Aged

KW - Clinical Trials as Topic

KW - Data Interpretation, Statistical

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - International Cooperation

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

KW - Quality of Life

KW - Questionnaires

KW - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

KW - Research Design

KW - Retrospective Studies

KW - Stroke

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001126

DO - 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001126

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 24052510

VL - 44

SP - 3161

EP - 3165

JO - STROKE

JF - STROKE

SN - 0039-2499

IS - 11

ER -