How to assess common somatic symptoms in large-scale studies: a systematic review of questionnaires
Standard
How to assess common somatic symptoms in large-scale studies: a systematic review of questionnaires. / Zijlema, Wilma L; Stolk, Ronald P; Löwe, Bernd; Rief, Winfried; White, Peter D; Rosmalen, Judith G M; BioSHaRE.
in: J PSYCHOSOM RES, Jahrgang 74, Nr. 6, 01.06.2013, S. 459-68.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - How to assess common somatic symptoms in large-scale studies: a systematic review of questionnaires
AU - Zijlema, Wilma L
AU - Stolk, Ronald P
AU - Löwe, Bernd
AU - Rief, Winfried
AU - White, Peter D
AU - Rosmalen, Judith G M
AU - BioSHaRE
N1 - Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2013/6/1
Y1 - 2013/6/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE: Many questionnaires for assessment of common somatic symptoms or functional somatic symptoms are available and their use differs greatly among studies. The prevalence and incidence of symptoms are partially determined by the methods used to assess them. As a result, comparison across studies is difficult. This article describes a systematic review of self-report questionnaires for somatic symptoms for use in large-scale studies and recommends two questionnaires for use in such studies.METHODS: A literature search was performed in the databases Medline, PsycINFO and EMBASE. Articles that reported the development, evaluation, or review of a self-report somatic symptom measure were included. Instrument evaluation was based on validity and reliability, and their fitness for purpose in large scale studies, according to the PhenX criteria.RESULTS: The literature search identified 40 questionnaires. The number of items within the questionnaires ranged from 5 to 78 items. In 70% of the questionnaires, headaches were included, followed by nausea/upset stomach (65%), shortness of breath/breathing trouble (58%), dizziness (55%), and (low) back pain/backaches (55%). Data on validity and reliability were reported and used for evaluation.CONCLUSION: Questionnaires varied regarding usability and burden to participants, and relevance to a variety of populations and regions. Based on our criteria, the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 and the Symptom Checklist-90 somatization scale seem the most fit for purpose for use in large-scale studies. These two questionnaires have well-established psychometric properties, contain relevant symptoms, are relatively short, and are available in multiple languages.
AB - OBJECTIVE: Many questionnaires for assessment of common somatic symptoms or functional somatic symptoms are available and their use differs greatly among studies. The prevalence and incidence of symptoms are partially determined by the methods used to assess them. As a result, comparison across studies is difficult. This article describes a systematic review of self-report questionnaires for somatic symptoms for use in large-scale studies and recommends two questionnaires for use in such studies.METHODS: A literature search was performed in the databases Medline, PsycINFO and EMBASE. Articles that reported the development, evaluation, or review of a self-report somatic symptom measure were included. Instrument evaluation was based on validity and reliability, and their fitness for purpose in large scale studies, according to the PhenX criteria.RESULTS: The literature search identified 40 questionnaires. The number of items within the questionnaires ranged from 5 to 78 items. In 70% of the questionnaires, headaches were included, followed by nausea/upset stomach (65%), shortness of breath/breathing trouble (58%), dizziness (55%), and (low) back pain/backaches (55%). Data on validity and reliability were reported and used for evaluation.CONCLUSION: Questionnaires varied regarding usability and burden to participants, and relevance to a variety of populations and regions. Based on our criteria, the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 and the Symptom Checklist-90 somatization scale seem the most fit for purpose for use in large-scale studies. These two questionnaires have well-established psychometric properties, contain relevant symptoms, are relatively short, and are available in multiple languages.
KW - Dizziness
KW - Dyspnea
KW - Headache
KW - Humans
KW - Low Back Pain
KW - Nausea
KW - Psychometrics
KW - Questionnaires
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Symptom Assessment
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.03.093
DO - 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.03.093
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 23731742
VL - 74
SP - 459
EP - 468
JO - J PSYCHOSOM RES
JF - J PSYCHOSOM RES
SN - 0022-3999
IS - 6
ER -