How to assess common somatic symptoms in large-scale studies: a systematic review of questionnaires

Standard

How to assess common somatic symptoms in large-scale studies: a systematic review of questionnaires. / Zijlema, Wilma L; Stolk, Ronald P; Löwe, Bernd; Rief, Winfried; White, Peter D; Rosmalen, Judith G M; BioSHaRE.

in: J PSYCHOSOM RES, Jahrgang 74, Nr. 6, 01.06.2013, S. 459-68.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{9eb0582e9bbe40cd97604d0907b4f233,
title = "How to assess common somatic symptoms in large-scale studies: a systematic review of questionnaires",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Many questionnaires for assessment of common somatic symptoms or functional somatic symptoms are available and their use differs greatly among studies. The prevalence and incidence of symptoms are partially determined by the methods used to assess them. As a result, comparison across studies is difficult. This article describes a systematic review of self-report questionnaires for somatic symptoms for use in large-scale studies and recommends two questionnaires for use in such studies.METHODS: A literature search was performed in the databases Medline, PsycINFO and EMBASE. Articles that reported the development, evaluation, or review of a self-report somatic symptom measure were included. Instrument evaluation was based on validity and reliability, and their fitness for purpose in large scale studies, according to the PhenX criteria.RESULTS: The literature search identified 40 questionnaires. The number of items within the questionnaires ranged from 5 to 78 items. In 70% of the questionnaires, headaches were included, followed by nausea/upset stomach (65%), shortness of breath/breathing trouble (58%), dizziness (55%), and (low) back pain/backaches (55%). Data on validity and reliability were reported and used for evaluation.CONCLUSION: Questionnaires varied regarding usability and burden to participants, and relevance to a variety of populations and regions. Based on our criteria, the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 and the Symptom Checklist-90 somatization scale seem the most fit for purpose for use in large-scale studies. These two questionnaires have well-established psychometric properties, contain relevant symptoms, are relatively short, and are available in multiple languages.",
keywords = "Dizziness, Dyspnea, Headache, Humans, Low Back Pain, Nausea, Psychometrics, Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Symptom Assessment",
author = "Zijlema, {Wilma L} and Stolk, {Ronald P} and Bernd L{\"o}we and Winfried Rief and White, {Peter D} and Rosmalen, {Judith G M} and BioSHaRE",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2013",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.03.093",
language = "English",
volume = "74",
pages = "459--68",
journal = "J PSYCHOSOM RES",
issn = "0022-3999",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How to assess common somatic symptoms in large-scale studies: a systematic review of questionnaires

AU - Zijlema, Wilma L

AU - Stolk, Ronald P

AU - Löwe, Bernd

AU - Rief, Winfried

AU - White, Peter D

AU - Rosmalen, Judith G M

AU - BioSHaRE

N1 - Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2013/6/1

Y1 - 2013/6/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Many questionnaires for assessment of common somatic symptoms or functional somatic symptoms are available and their use differs greatly among studies. The prevalence and incidence of symptoms are partially determined by the methods used to assess them. As a result, comparison across studies is difficult. This article describes a systematic review of self-report questionnaires for somatic symptoms for use in large-scale studies and recommends two questionnaires for use in such studies.METHODS: A literature search was performed in the databases Medline, PsycINFO and EMBASE. Articles that reported the development, evaluation, or review of a self-report somatic symptom measure were included. Instrument evaluation was based on validity and reliability, and their fitness for purpose in large scale studies, according to the PhenX criteria.RESULTS: The literature search identified 40 questionnaires. The number of items within the questionnaires ranged from 5 to 78 items. In 70% of the questionnaires, headaches were included, followed by nausea/upset stomach (65%), shortness of breath/breathing trouble (58%), dizziness (55%), and (low) back pain/backaches (55%). Data on validity and reliability were reported and used for evaluation.CONCLUSION: Questionnaires varied regarding usability and burden to participants, and relevance to a variety of populations and regions. Based on our criteria, the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 and the Symptom Checklist-90 somatization scale seem the most fit for purpose for use in large-scale studies. These two questionnaires have well-established psychometric properties, contain relevant symptoms, are relatively short, and are available in multiple languages.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Many questionnaires for assessment of common somatic symptoms or functional somatic symptoms are available and their use differs greatly among studies. The prevalence and incidence of symptoms are partially determined by the methods used to assess them. As a result, comparison across studies is difficult. This article describes a systematic review of self-report questionnaires for somatic symptoms for use in large-scale studies and recommends two questionnaires for use in such studies.METHODS: A literature search was performed in the databases Medline, PsycINFO and EMBASE. Articles that reported the development, evaluation, or review of a self-report somatic symptom measure were included. Instrument evaluation was based on validity and reliability, and their fitness for purpose in large scale studies, according to the PhenX criteria.RESULTS: The literature search identified 40 questionnaires. The number of items within the questionnaires ranged from 5 to 78 items. In 70% of the questionnaires, headaches were included, followed by nausea/upset stomach (65%), shortness of breath/breathing trouble (58%), dizziness (55%), and (low) back pain/backaches (55%). Data on validity and reliability were reported and used for evaluation.CONCLUSION: Questionnaires varied regarding usability and burden to participants, and relevance to a variety of populations and regions. Based on our criteria, the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 and the Symptom Checklist-90 somatization scale seem the most fit for purpose for use in large-scale studies. These two questionnaires have well-established psychometric properties, contain relevant symptoms, are relatively short, and are available in multiple languages.

KW - Dizziness

KW - Dyspnea

KW - Headache

KW - Humans

KW - Low Back Pain

KW - Nausea

KW - Psychometrics

KW - Questionnaires

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Symptom Assessment

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.03.093

DO - 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.03.093

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 23731742

VL - 74

SP - 459

EP - 468

JO - J PSYCHOSOM RES

JF - J PSYCHOSOM RES

SN - 0022-3999

IS - 6

ER -