Histopathological regression after neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil or capecitabine in patients with resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4-AIO): results from the phase 2 part of a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2/3 trial

Standard

Histopathological regression after neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil or capecitabine in patients with resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4-AIO): results from the phase 2 part of a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2/3 trial. / Al-Batran, Salah-Eddin; Hofheinz, Ralf D; Pauligk, Claudia; Kopp, Hans-Georg; Haag, Georg Martin; Luley, Kim Barbara; Meiler, Johannes; Homann, Nils; Lorenzen, Sylvie; Schmalenberg, Harald; Probst, Stephan; Koenigsmann, Michael; Egger, Matthias; Prasnikar, Nicole; Caca, Karel; Trojan, Jörg; Martens, Uwe M; Block, Andreas; Fischbach, Wolfgang; Mahlberg, Rolf; Clemens, Michael; Illerhaus, Gerald; Zirlik, Katja; Behringer, Dirk M; Schmiegel, Wolff; Pohl, Michael; Heike, Michael; Ronellenfitsch, Ulrich; Schuler, Martin; Bechstein, Wolf O; Königsrainer, Alfred; Gaiser, Timo; Schirmacher, Peter; Hozaeel, Wael; Reichart, Alexander; Goetze, Thorsten O; Sievert, Mark; Jäger, Elke; Mönig, Stefan; Tannapfel, Andrea.

in: LANCET ONCOL, Jahrgang 17, Nr. 12, 12.2016, S. 1697-1708.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Al-Batran, S-E, Hofheinz, RD, Pauligk, C, Kopp, H-G, Haag, GM, Luley, KB, Meiler, J, Homann, N, Lorenzen, S, Schmalenberg, H, Probst, S, Koenigsmann, M, Egger, M, Prasnikar, N, Caca, K, Trojan, J, Martens, UM, Block, A, Fischbach, W, Mahlberg, R, Clemens, M, Illerhaus, G, Zirlik, K, Behringer, DM, Schmiegel, W, Pohl, M, Heike, M, Ronellenfitsch, U, Schuler, M, Bechstein, WO, Königsrainer, A, Gaiser, T, Schirmacher, P, Hozaeel, W, Reichart, A, Goetze, TO, Sievert, M, Jäger, E, Mönig, S & Tannapfel, A 2016, 'Histopathological regression after neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil or capecitabine in patients with resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4-AIO): results from the phase 2 part of a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2/3 trial', LANCET ONCOL, Jg. 17, Nr. 12, S. 1697-1708. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30531-9

APA

Al-Batran, S-E., Hofheinz, R. D., Pauligk, C., Kopp, H-G., Haag, G. M., Luley, K. B., Meiler, J., Homann, N., Lorenzen, S., Schmalenberg, H., Probst, S., Koenigsmann, M., Egger, M., Prasnikar, N., Caca, K., Trojan, J., Martens, U. M., Block, A., Fischbach, W., ... Tannapfel, A. (2016). Histopathological regression after neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil or capecitabine in patients with resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4-AIO): results from the phase 2 part of a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2/3 trial. LANCET ONCOL, 17(12), 1697-1708. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30531-9

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{5c46211442a04cc694bd290ff0976ba3,
title = "Histopathological regression after neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil or capecitabine in patients with resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4-AIO): results from the phase 2 part of a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2/3 trial",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Docetaxel-based chemotherapy is effective in metastatic gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, but has not yet been evaluated in the context of resectable patients. Here we report findings from the phase 2 part of the phase 2/3 FLOT4 trial, which compared histopathological regression in patients treated with a docetaxel-based triplet chemotherapy versus an anthracycline-based triplet chemotherapy before surgical resection.METHODS: In this randomised, open-label, phase 2/3 study, eligible participants were recruited from 28 German oncology centres. Patients with resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer who had clinical stage cT2 or higher, nodal positive (cN+) disease, or both were randomly assigned (1:1) to either three preoperative and three postoperative 3-week cycles of intravenous epirubicin 50 mg/m2 on day 1, intravenous cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1, and either fluorouracil 200 mg/m2 as continuous intravenous infusion or capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 orally (two doses of 625 mg/m2 per day) on days 1 to 21 (ECF/ECX group) or four preoperative and four postoperative 2-week cycles of docetaxel 50 mg/m2, intravenous oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, intravenous leucovorin 200 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 2600 mg/m2 as a 24 h infusion, all on day 1 (FLOT group). Randomisation was done centrally with an interactive web-response system based on a sequence generated with blocks (block size 2) stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, location of primary tumour, age, and nodal status. No masking was done. Central assessment of pathological regression was done according to the Becker criteria. The primary endpoint was pathological complete regression (tumour regression grade TRG1a) and was analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population, defined as all patients who were randomly assigned to treatment excluding patients who had surgery but did not provide resection specimens for central evaluation. The study (including the phase 3 part) has completed enrolment, but follow-up is ongoing and this is an interim analysis. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01216644.FINDINGS: Between Aug 18, 2010, and Aug 10, 2012, 300 patients (152 patients in the ECF/ECX group; 148 patients in the FLOT group) were enrolled into the phase 2 part of the study, 265 of whom (137 in the ECF/ECX group; 128 in the FLOT group) were assessable on a modified intention-to-treat basis. 119 (93%) of 128 patients in the FLOT group and 126 (92%) of 137 patients in the ECF/ECX group were given all planned preoperative cycles of treatment. FLOT was associated with significantly higher proportions of patients achieving pathological complete regression than was ECF/ECX (20 [16%; 95% CI 10-23] of 128 patients vs eight [6%; 3-11] of 137 patients; p=0·02). 44 (40%) of 111 patients in the ECF/ECX group and 30 (25%) of 119 patients in the FLOT group had at least one serious adverse event involving a perioperative medical or surgical complication. The most common non-surgical grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (52 [38%] of 137 patients in the ECF/ECX group vs 67 [52%] of 128 patients in the FLOT group), leucopenia (28 [20%] vs 36 [28%]), nausea (23 [17%] vs 12 [9%]), infection (16 [12%] vs 15 [12%]), fatigue (19 [14%] vs 11 [9%]), and vomiting (13 [10%] vs four [3%]).INTERPRETATION: Perioperative FLOT was active and feasible to administer, and might represent an option for patients with locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-eosophageal junction adenocarcinoma.FUNDING: None.",
keywords = "Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy, Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects, Cisplatin/administration & dosage, Docetaxel, Epirubicin/administration & dosage, Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy, Esophagogastric Junction, Female, Humans, Leucovorin/administration & dosage, Male, Middle Aged, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy, Taxoids/administration & dosage",
author = "Salah-Eddin Al-Batran and Hofheinz, {Ralf D} and Claudia Pauligk and Hans-Georg Kopp and Haag, {Georg Martin} and Luley, {Kim Barbara} and Johannes Meiler and Nils Homann and Sylvie Lorenzen and Harald Schmalenberg and Stephan Probst and Michael Koenigsmann and Matthias Egger and Nicole Prasnikar and Karel Caca and J{\"o}rg Trojan and Martens, {Uwe M} and Andreas Block and Wolfgang Fischbach and Rolf Mahlberg and Michael Clemens and Gerald Illerhaus and Katja Zirlik and Behringer, {Dirk M} and Wolff Schmiegel and Michael Pohl and Michael Heike and Ulrich Ronellenfitsch and Martin Schuler and Bechstein, {Wolf O} and Alfred K{\"o}nigsrainer and Timo Gaiser and Peter Schirmacher and Wael Hozaeel and Alexander Reichart and Goetze, {Thorsten O} and Mark Sievert and Elke J{\"a}ger and Stefan M{\"o}nig and Andrea Tannapfel",
note = "Copyright {\^A}{\textcopyright} 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
year = "2016",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30531-9",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "1697--1708",
journal = "LANCET ONCOL",
issn = "1470-2045",
publisher = "Lancet Publishing Group",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Histopathological regression after neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil or capecitabine in patients with resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4-AIO): results from the phase 2 part of a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2/3 trial

AU - Al-Batran, Salah-Eddin

AU - Hofheinz, Ralf D

AU - Pauligk, Claudia

AU - Kopp, Hans-Georg

AU - Haag, Georg Martin

AU - Luley, Kim Barbara

AU - Meiler, Johannes

AU - Homann, Nils

AU - Lorenzen, Sylvie

AU - Schmalenberg, Harald

AU - Probst, Stephan

AU - Koenigsmann, Michael

AU - Egger, Matthias

AU - Prasnikar, Nicole

AU - Caca, Karel

AU - Trojan, Jörg

AU - Martens, Uwe M

AU - Block, Andreas

AU - Fischbach, Wolfgang

AU - Mahlberg, Rolf

AU - Clemens, Michael

AU - Illerhaus, Gerald

AU - Zirlik, Katja

AU - Behringer, Dirk M

AU - Schmiegel, Wolff

AU - Pohl, Michael

AU - Heike, Michael

AU - Ronellenfitsch, Ulrich

AU - Schuler, Martin

AU - Bechstein, Wolf O

AU - Königsrainer, Alfred

AU - Gaiser, Timo

AU - Schirmacher, Peter

AU - Hozaeel, Wael

AU - Reichart, Alexander

AU - Goetze, Thorsten O

AU - Sievert, Mark

AU - Jäger, Elke

AU - Mönig, Stefan

AU - Tannapfel, Andrea

N1 - Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

PY - 2016/12

Y1 - 2016/12

N2 - BACKGROUND: Docetaxel-based chemotherapy is effective in metastatic gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, but has not yet been evaluated in the context of resectable patients. Here we report findings from the phase 2 part of the phase 2/3 FLOT4 trial, which compared histopathological regression in patients treated with a docetaxel-based triplet chemotherapy versus an anthracycline-based triplet chemotherapy before surgical resection.METHODS: In this randomised, open-label, phase 2/3 study, eligible participants were recruited from 28 German oncology centres. Patients with resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer who had clinical stage cT2 or higher, nodal positive (cN+) disease, or both were randomly assigned (1:1) to either three preoperative and three postoperative 3-week cycles of intravenous epirubicin 50 mg/m2 on day 1, intravenous cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1, and either fluorouracil 200 mg/m2 as continuous intravenous infusion or capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 orally (two doses of 625 mg/m2 per day) on days 1 to 21 (ECF/ECX group) or four preoperative and four postoperative 2-week cycles of docetaxel 50 mg/m2, intravenous oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, intravenous leucovorin 200 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 2600 mg/m2 as a 24 h infusion, all on day 1 (FLOT group). Randomisation was done centrally with an interactive web-response system based on a sequence generated with blocks (block size 2) stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, location of primary tumour, age, and nodal status. No masking was done. Central assessment of pathological regression was done according to the Becker criteria. The primary endpoint was pathological complete regression (tumour regression grade TRG1a) and was analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population, defined as all patients who were randomly assigned to treatment excluding patients who had surgery but did not provide resection specimens for central evaluation. The study (including the phase 3 part) has completed enrolment, but follow-up is ongoing and this is an interim analysis. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01216644.FINDINGS: Between Aug 18, 2010, and Aug 10, 2012, 300 patients (152 patients in the ECF/ECX group; 148 patients in the FLOT group) were enrolled into the phase 2 part of the study, 265 of whom (137 in the ECF/ECX group; 128 in the FLOT group) were assessable on a modified intention-to-treat basis. 119 (93%) of 128 patients in the FLOT group and 126 (92%) of 137 patients in the ECF/ECX group were given all planned preoperative cycles of treatment. FLOT was associated with significantly higher proportions of patients achieving pathological complete regression than was ECF/ECX (20 [16%; 95% CI 10-23] of 128 patients vs eight [6%; 3-11] of 137 patients; p=0·02). 44 (40%) of 111 patients in the ECF/ECX group and 30 (25%) of 119 patients in the FLOT group had at least one serious adverse event involving a perioperative medical or surgical complication. The most common non-surgical grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (52 [38%] of 137 patients in the ECF/ECX group vs 67 [52%] of 128 patients in the FLOT group), leucopenia (28 [20%] vs 36 [28%]), nausea (23 [17%] vs 12 [9%]), infection (16 [12%] vs 15 [12%]), fatigue (19 [14%] vs 11 [9%]), and vomiting (13 [10%] vs four [3%]).INTERPRETATION: Perioperative FLOT was active and feasible to administer, and might represent an option for patients with locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-eosophageal junction adenocarcinoma.FUNDING: None.

AB - BACKGROUND: Docetaxel-based chemotherapy is effective in metastatic gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, but has not yet been evaluated in the context of resectable patients. Here we report findings from the phase 2 part of the phase 2/3 FLOT4 trial, which compared histopathological regression in patients treated with a docetaxel-based triplet chemotherapy versus an anthracycline-based triplet chemotherapy before surgical resection.METHODS: In this randomised, open-label, phase 2/3 study, eligible participants were recruited from 28 German oncology centres. Patients with resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer who had clinical stage cT2 or higher, nodal positive (cN+) disease, or both were randomly assigned (1:1) to either three preoperative and three postoperative 3-week cycles of intravenous epirubicin 50 mg/m2 on day 1, intravenous cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1, and either fluorouracil 200 mg/m2 as continuous intravenous infusion or capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 orally (two doses of 625 mg/m2 per day) on days 1 to 21 (ECF/ECX group) or four preoperative and four postoperative 2-week cycles of docetaxel 50 mg/m2, intravenous oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, intravenous leucovorin 200 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 2600 mg/m2 as a 24 h infusion, all on day 1 (FLOT group). Randomisation was done centrally with an interactive web-response system based on a sequence generated with blocks (block size 2) stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, location of primary tumour, age, and nodal status. No masking was done. Central assessment of pathological regression was done according to the Becker criteria. The primary endpoint was pathological complete regression (tumour regression grade TRG1a) and was analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population, defined as all patients who were randomly assigned to treatment excluding patients who had surgery but did not provide resection specimens for central evaluation. The study (including the phase 3 part) has completed enrolment, but follow-up is ongoing and this is an interim analysis. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01216644.FINDINGS: Between Aug 18, 2010, and Aug 10, 2012, 300 patients (152 patients in the ECF/ECX group; 148 patients in the FLOT group) were enrolled into the phase 2 part of the study, 265 of whom (137 in the ECF/ECX group; 128 in the FLOT group) were assessable on a modified intention-to-treat basis. 119 (93%) of 128 patients in the FLOT group and 126 (92%) of 137 patients in the ECF/ECX group were given all planned preoperative cycles of treatment. FLOT was associated with significantly higher proportions of patients achieving pathological complete regression than was ECF/ECX (20 [16%; 95% CI 10-23] of 128 patients vs eight [6%; 3-11] of 137 patients; p=0·02). 44 (40%) of 111 patients in the ECF/ECX group and 30 (25%) of 119 patients in the FLOT group had at least one serious adverse event involving a perioperative medical or surgical complication. The most common non-surgical grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (52 [38%] of 137 patients in the ECF/ECX group vs 67 [52%] of 128 patients in the FLOT group), leucopenia (28 [20%] vs 36 [28%]), nausea (23 [17%] vs 12 [9%]), infection (16 [12%] vs 15 [12%]), fatigue (19 [14%] vs 11 [9%]), and vomiting (13 [10%] vs four [3%]).INTERPRETATION: Perioperative FLOT was active and feasible to administer, and might represent an option for patients with locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-eosophageal junction adenocarcinoma.FUNDING: None.

KW - Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy

KW - Adult

KW - Aged

KW - Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects

KW - Cisplatin/administration & dosage

KW - Docetaxel

KW - Epirubicin/administration & dosage

KW - Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy

KW - Esophagogastric Junction

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Leucovorin/administration & dosage

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Neoadjuvant Therapy

KW - Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy

KW - Taxoids/administration & dosage

U2 - 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30531-9

DO - 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30531-9

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 27776843

VL - 17

SP - 1697

EP - 1708

JO - LANCET ONCOL

JF - LANCET ONCOL

SN - 1470-2045

IS - 12

ER -