High Rates of Occult Infection After Shoulder Fracture Fixation: Considerations for Conversion Shoulder Arthroplasty

Standard

High Rates of Occult Infection After Shoulder Fracture Fixation: Considerations for Conversion Shoulder Arthroplasty. / Klatte, Till O; Sabihi, Reza; Guenther, Daniel; Kamath, Atul F; Rueger, Johannes M; Gehrke, Thorsten; Kendoff, Daniel.

in: FEBS J, Jahrgang 11, Nr. 3, 17.06.2015, S. 198-203.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Klatte, TO, Sabihi, R, Guenther, D, Kamath, AF, Rueger, JM, Gehrke, T & Kendoff, D 2015, 'High Rates of Occult Infection After Shoulder Fracture Fixation: Considerations for Conversion Shoulder Arthroplasty', FEBS J, Jg. 11, Nr. 3, S. 198-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-015-9450-z

APA

Klatte, T. O., Sabihi, R., Guenther, D., Kamath, A. F., Rueger, J. M., Gehrke, T., & Kendoff, D. (2015). High Rates of Occult Infection After Shoulder Fracture Fixation: Considerations for Conversion Shoulder Arthroplasty. FEBS J, 11(3), 198-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-015-9450-z

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{c010847f02f64f8aa78a18d2198b37db,
title = "High Rates of Occult Infection After Shoulder Fracture Fixation: Considerations for Conversion Shoulder Arthroplasty",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Existing hardware may contribute to increased risk of bacterial contamination and subsequent periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in conversion shoulder arthroplasty performed for failed fracture fixation.QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: This study examined the incidence of positive pre-operative aspiration and inflammatory marker data, along with correlation of pre-operative positive aspiration or inflammatory markers and subsequent infection following conversion shoulder arthroplasty for failed open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and the need for re-operation at 4.6-year follow-up.METHODS: Twenty-eight patients who underwent conversion to shoulder arthroplasty for any reason after fracture fixation were retrospectively reviewed in a single center. A pre-operative aspiration was done in 17 patients; all patients had intra-operative tissue sampling. All procedures were single-stage removal of hardware and performance of the arthroplasty. In cases of pre-operative positive bacterial growth, a single-stage procedure was performed according to the septic ENDO-Klinik protocol.RESULTS: In 4 of 17 pre-operative joint aspirations, bacterial growth was detected; one pre-operative negative aspiration demonstrated bacterial growth in intra-operative sampling. In three of them, the infection has been validated through intra-operatively results. Pre-operative aspiration showed a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 92% (p < 0.005) for infection. No post-operative PJIs were observed. Six revisions were performed, most commonly for aseptic loosening (two cases) and conversion of hemiarthroplasty to a reverse design (two cases).CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the risk of low-grade shoulder infection after fracture osteosynthesis may be higher than in hip and knee joints, based on limited study data. Adequate pre-operative testing is recommended to rule out occult shoulder infection in this setting.",
author = "Klatte, {Till O} and Reza Sabihi and Daniel Guenther and Kamath, {Atul F} and Rueger, {Johannes M} and Thorsten Gehrke and Daniel Kendoff",
year = "2015",
month = jun,
day = "17",
doi = "10.1007/s11420-015-9450-z",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "198--203",
journal = "FEBS J",
issn = "1742-464X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - High Rates of Occult Infection After Shoulder Fracture Fixation: Considerations for Conversion Shoulder Arthroplasty

AU - Klatte, Till O

AU - Sabihi, Reza

AU - Guenther, Daniel

AU - Kamath, Atul F

AU - Rueger, Johannes M

AU - Gehrke, Thorsten

AU - Kendoff, Daniel

PY - 2015/6/17

Y1 - 2015/6/17

N2 - BACKGROUND: Existing hardware may contribute to increased risk of bacterial contamination and subsequent periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in conversion shoulder arthroplasty performed for failed fracture fixation.QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: This study examined the incidence of positive pre-operative aspiration and inflammatory marker data, along with correlation of pre-operative positive aspiration or inflammatory markers and subsequent infection following conversion shoulder arthroplasty for failed open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and the need for re-operation at 4.6-year follow-up.METHODS: Twenty-eight patients who underwent conversion to shoulder arthroplasty for any reason after fracture fixation were retrospectively reviewed in a single center. A pre-operative aspiration was done in 17 patients; all patients had intra-operative tissue sampling. All procedures were single-stage removal of hardware and performance of the arthroplasty. In cases of pre-operative positive bacterial growth, a single-stage procedure was performed according to the septic ENDO-Klinik protocol.RESULTS: In 4 of 17 pre-operative joint aspirations, bacterial growth was detected; one pre-operative negative aspiration demonstrated bacterial growth in intra-operative sampling. In three of them, the infection has been validated through intra-operatively results. Pre-operative aspiration showed a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 92% (p < 0.005) for infection. No post-operative PJIs were observed. Six revisions were performed, most commonly for aseptic loosening (two cases) and conversion of hemiarthroplasty to a reverse design (two cases).CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the risk of low-grade shoulder infection after fracture osteosynthesis may be higher than in hip and knee joints, based on limited study data. Adequate pre-operative testing is recommended to rule out occult shoulder infection in this setting.

AB - BACKGROUND: Existing hardware may contribute to increased risk of bacterial contamination and subsequent periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in conversion shoulder arthroplasty performed for failed fracture fixation.QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: This study examined the incidence of positive pre-operative aspiration and inflammatory marker data, along with correlation of pre-operative positive aspiration or inflammatory markers and subsequent infection following conversion shoulder arthroplasty for failed open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and the need for re-operation at 4.6-year follow-up.METHODS: Twenty-eight patients who underwent conversion to shoulder arthroplasty for any reason after fracture fixation were retrospectively reviewed in a single center. A pre-operative aspiration was done in 17 patients; all patients had intra-operative tissue sampling. All procedures were single-stage removal of hardware and performance of the arthroplasty. In cases of pre-operative positive bacterial growth, a single-stage procedure was performed according to the septic ENDO-Klinik protocol.RESULTS: In 4 of 17 pre-operative joint aspirations, bacterial growth was detected; one pre-operative negative aspiration demonstrated bacterial growth in intra-operative sampling. In three of them, the infection has been validated through intra-operatively results. Pre-operative aspiration showed a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 92% (p < 0.005) for infection. No post-operative PJIs were observed. Six revisions were performed, most commonly for aseptic loosening (two cases) and conversion of hemiarthroplasty to a reverse design (two cases).CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the risk of low-grade shoulder infection after fracture osteosynthesis may be higher than in hip and knee joints, based on limited study data. Adequate pre-operative testing is recommended to rule out occult shoulder infection in this setting.

U2 - 10.1007/s11420-015-9450-z

DO - 10.1007/s11420-015-9450-z

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 26981053

VL - 11

SP - 198

EP - 203

JO - FEBS J

JF - FEBS J

SN - 1742-464X

IS - 3

ER -