Heat production during different ultrasonic and conventional osteotomy preparations for dental implants

Ashkan Rashad; Anja Kaiser; Nora Prochnow; Inge Schmitz; Eike Hoffmann; Peter Maurer

doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02126.x

Heat production during different ultrasonic and conventional osteotomy preparations for dental implants

Standard

Heat production during different ultrasonic and conventional osteotomy preparations for dental implants. / Rashad, Ashkan; Kaiser, Anja; Prochnow, Nora; Schmitz, Inge; Hoffmann, Eike; Maurer, Peter.

in: Clinical oral implants research, Jahrgang 22, Nr. 12, 12.2011, S. 1361-5.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung

Harvard

Rashad, A, Kaiser, A, Prochnow, N, Schmitz, I, Hoffmann, E & Maurer, P 2011, 'Heat production during different ultrasonic and conventional osteotomy preparations for dental implants', Clinical oral implants research, Jg. 22, Nr. 12, S. 1361-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02126.x

APA

Rashad, A., Kaiser, A., Prochnow, N., Schmitz, I., Hoffmann, E., & Maurer, P. (2011). Heat production during different ultrasonic and conventional osteotomy preparations for dental implants. Clinical oral implants research, 22(12), 1361-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02126.x

Vancouver

Rashad A, Kaiser A, Prochnow N, Schmitz I, Hoffmann E, Maurer P. Heat production during different ultrasonic and conventional osteotomy preparations for dental implants. Clinical oral implants research. 2011 Dez;22(12):1361-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02126.x

Bibtex

@article{b9580c6e342b4673a2168c3308b9c8d5,

title = "Heat production during different ultrasonic and conventional osteotomy preparations for dental implants",

abstract = "OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intraosseous temperature changes during ultrasonic and conventional implant site preparation in vitro with respect to the effect of load and irrigation volume.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Implant sites were prepared using two different ultrasonic devices (Piezosurgery, Mectron Medical Technology and VarioSurg, NSK) and one conventional device (Straumann) at loads of 5, 8, 15 and 20 N and with irrigation volumes of 20, 50 and 80 ml/min. During implant site preparation, temperatures were measured in fresh, equally tempered bovine ribs using two thermocouples placed at a distance of 1.5 mm around the drilling site in cortical and cancellous bone. The preparation time was recorded.RESULTS: The heat production and time required for implant site preparation using both ultrasonic devices were significantly higher than those for conventional drilling (P<0.01). Increased loading had no effect on heat production. A higher irrigation volume was associated with a diminished temperature increase in the cortical bone for ultrasonic but not for conventional drilling, which resulted in significantly lower temperatures in cortical as compared with cancellous bone during ultrasonic implant site preparation.CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonic implant site preparation is more time consuming and generates higher bone temperatures than conventional drilling. However, with the levels of irrigation, ultrasonic implant site preparation can be an equally safe method.",

keywords = "Animals, Cattle, Dental High-Speed Technique, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Hot Temperature, Humans, Osteotomy, Piezosurgery, Ribs, Statistics, Nonparametric, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't",

author = "Ashkan Rashad and Anja Kaiser and Nora Prochnow and Inge Schmitz and Eike Hoffmann and Peter Maurer",

note = "{\textcopyright} 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.",

year = "2011",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02126.x",

language = "English",

volume = "22",

pages = "1361--5",

journal = "CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES",

issn = "0905-7161",

publisher = "Blackwell Munksgaard",

number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Heat production during different ultrasonic and conventional osteotomy preparations for dental implants

AU - Rashad, Ashkan

AU - Kaiser, Anja

AU - Prochnow, Nora

AU - Schmitz, Inge

AU - Hoffmann, Eike

AU - Maurer, Peter

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intraosseous temperature changes during ultrasonic and conventional implant site preparation in vitro with respect to the effect of load and irrigation volume.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Implant sites were prepared using two different ultrasonic devices (Piezosurgery, Mectron Medical Technology and VarioSurg, NSK) and one conventional device (Straumann) at loads of 5, 8, 15 and 20 N and with irrigation volumes of 20, 50 and 80 ml/min. During implant site preparation, temperatures were measured in fresh, equally tempered bovine ribs using two thermocouples placed at a distance of 1.5 mm around the drilling site in cortical and cancellous bone. The preparation time was recorded.RESULTS: The heat production and time required for implant site preparation using both ultrasonic devices were significantly higher than those for conventional drilling (P<0.01). Increased loading had no effect on heat production. A higher irrigation volume was associated with a diminished temperature increase in the cortical bone for ultrasonic but not for conventional drilling, which resulted in significantly lower temperatures in cortical as compared with cancellous bone during ultrasonic implant site preparation.CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonic implant site preparation is more time consuming and generates higher bone temperatures than conventional drilling. However, with the levels of irrigation, ultrasonic implant site preparation can be an equally safe method.

AB - OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intraosseous temperature changes during ultrasonic and conventional implant site preparation in vitro with respect to the effect of load and irrigation volume.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Implant sites were prepared using two different ultrasonic devices (Piezosurgery, Mectron Medical Technology and VarioSurg, NSK) and one conventional device (Straumann) at loads of 5, 8, 15 and 20 N and with irrigation volumes of 20, 50 and 80 ml/min. During implant site preparation, temperatures were measured in fresh, equally tempered bovine ribs using two thermocouples placed at a distance of 1.5 mm around the drilling site in cortical and cancellous bone. The preparation time was recorded.RESULTS: The heat production and time required for implant site preparation using both ultrasonic devices were significantly higher than those for conventional drilling (P<0.01). Increased loading had no effect on heat production. A higher irrigation volume was associated with a diminished temperature increase in the cortical bone for ultrasonic but not for conventional drilling, which resulted in significantly lower temperatures in cortical as compared with cancellous bone during ultrasonic implant site preparation.CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonic implant site preparation is more time consuming and generates higher bone temperatures than conventional drilling. However, with the levels of irrigation, ultrasonic implant site preparation can be an equally safe method.

KW - Animals

KW - Cattle

KW - Dental High-Speed Technique

KW - Dental Implantation, Endosseous

KW - Hot Temperature

KW - Humans

KW - Osteotomy

KW - Piezosurgery

KW - Ribs

KW - Statistics, Nonparametric

KW - Journal Article

KW - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02126.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02126.x

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 21435005

VL - 22

SP - 1361

EP - 1365

JO - CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES

JF - CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES

SN - 0905-7161

IS - 12

ER -