Handling of Polyvinylsiloxane Versus Polyether for Implant Impressions
Standard
Handling of Polyvinylsiloxane Versus Polyether for Implant Impressions. / Farhan, Daniel; Lauer, Wiebke; Heydecke, Guido; Aarabi, Ghazal; Reissmann, Daniel R.
in: INT J PROSTHODONT, Jahrgang 29, Nr. 4, 08.2016, S. 403-5.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Handling of Polyvinylsiloxane Versus Polyether for Implant Impressions
AU - Farhan, Daniel
AU - Lauer, Wiebke
AU - Heydecke, Guido
AU - Aarabi, Ghazal
AU - Reissmann, Daniel R
PY - 2016/8
Y1 - 2016/8
N2 - PURPOSE: This study compared polyvinylsiloxane with polyether in handling dental impressions.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each participant (N = 39) made four impressions, each a combination of pickup and reseating techniques with polyether or polyvinylsiloxane, of one implant cast representing a specific clinical situation (tooth gaps, limited residual dentition, or edentulous jaw). Handling of impressions was subsequently rated by using a 12-item questionnaire with 100-mm visual analog scales.RESULTS: While mean satisfaction scores were higher for polyvinylsiloxane than for polyether (69.5/63.0, P < .001), differences among subgroups were statistically significant only for pickup technique, limited residual dentition, and edentulous jaw.CONCLUSION: Implant impressions made with polyvinylsiloxane using a pickup technique seem to be the best option for most clinical situations.
AB - PURPOSE: This study compared polyvinylsiloxane with polyether in handling dental impressions.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each participant (N = 39) made four impressions, each a combination of pickup and reseating techniques with polyether or polyvinylsiloxane, of one implant cast representing a specific clinical situation (tooth gaps, limited residual dentition, or edentulous jaw). Handling of impressions was subsequently rated by using a 12-item questionnaire with 100-mm visual analog scales.RESULTS: While mean satisfaction scores were higher for polyvinylsiloxane than for polyether (69.5/63.0, P < .001), differences among subgroups were statistically significant only for pickup technique, limited residual dentition, and edentulous jaw.CONCLUSION: Implant impressions made with polyvinylsiloxane using a pickup technique seem to be the best option for most clinical situations.
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 27479351
VL - 29
SP - 403
EP - 405
JO - INT J PROSTHODONT
JF - INT J PROSTHODONT
SN - 0893-2174
IS - 4
ER -