Generalizability of the EAST-AFNET 4 Trial: Assessing Outcomes of Early Rhythm-Control Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Standard

Generalizability of the EAST-AFNET 4 Trial: Assessing Outcomes of Early Rhythm-Control Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation : Assessing Outcomes of Early Rhythm-Control Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. / Dickow, Jannis; Kirchhof, Paulus; Van Houten, Holly K; Sangaralingham, Lindsey R; Dinshaw, Leon H W; Friedman, Paul A; Packer, Douglas L; Noseworthy, Peter A; Yao, Xiaoxi.

in: J AM HEART ASSOC, Jahrgang 11, Nr. 11, e024214, 07.06.2022.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{37012b0774ea4ee59230490ee05e839e,
title = "Generalizability of the EAST-AFNET 4 Trial: Assessing Outcomes of Early Rhythm-Control Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Assessing Outcomes of Early Rhythm-Control Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation",
abstract = "Background EAST-AFNET 4 (Early Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation for Stroke Prevention Trial) demonstrated clinical benefit of early rhythm-control therapy (ERC) in patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) and concomitant cardiovascular conditions compared with current guideline-based practice. This study aimed to evaluate the generalizability of EAST-AFNET 4 in routine practice. Methods and Results Using a US administrative database, we identified 109 739 patients with newly diagnosed AF during the enrollment period of EAST-AFNET 4. Patients were classified as either receiving ERC, using AF ablation or antiarrhythmic drug therapy, within the first year after AF diagnosis (n=27 106) or not receiving ERC (control group, n=82 633). After propensity score overlap weighting, Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare groups for the primary composite outcome of all-cause mortality, stroke, or hospitalization with the diagnoses heart failure or myocardial infarction. Most patients (79 948 of 109 739; 72.9%) met the inclusion criteria for EAST-AFNET 4. ERC was associated with a reduced risk for the primary composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75-0.97 [P=0.02]) with largely consistent results between eligible (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.76-1.04 [P=0.14]) or ineligible (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.60-0.98 [P=0.04]) patients for EAST-AFNET 4 trial inclusion. ERC was associated with lower risk of stroke in the overall cohort and in trial-eligible patients. Conclusions This analysis replicates the clinical benefit of ERC seen in EAST-AFNET 4. The results support adoption of ERC as part of the management of recently diagnosed AF in the United States.",
keywords = "Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use, Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy, Catheter Ablation, Humans, Secondary Prevention, Stroke/epidemiology, United States/epidemiology",
author = "Jannis Dickow and Paulus Kirchhof and {Van Houten}, {Holly K} and Sangaralingham, {Lindsey R} and Dinshaw, {Leon H W} and Friedman, {Paul A} and Packer, {Douglas L} and Noseworthy, {Peter A} and Xiaoxi Yao",
year = "2022",
month = jun,
day = "7",
doi = "10.1161/JAHA.121.024214",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "J AM HEART ASSOC",
issn = "2047-9980",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Generalizability of the EAST-AFNET 4 Trial: Assessing Outcomes of Early Rhythm-Control Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

T2 - Assessing Outcomes of Early Rhythm-Control Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

AU - Dickow, Jannis

AU - Kirchhof, Paulus

AU - Van Houten, Holly K

AU - Sangaralingham, Lindsey R

AU - Dinshaw, Leon H W

AU - Friedman, Paul A

AU - Packer, Douglas L

AU - Noseworthy, Peter A

AU - Yao, Xiaoxi

PY - 2022/6/7

Y1 - 2022/6/7

N2 - Background EAST-AFNET 4 (Early Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation for Stroke Prevention Trial) demonstrated clinical benefit of early rhythm-control therapy (ERC) in patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) and concomitant cardiovascular conditions compared with current guideline-based practice. This study aimed to evaluate the generalizability of EAST-AFNET 4 in routine practice. Methods and Results Using a US administrative database, we identified 109 739 patients with newly diagnosed AF during the enrollment period of EAST-AFNET 4. Patients were classified as either receiving ERC, using AF ablation or antiarrhythmic drug therapy, within the first year after AF diagnosis (n=27 106) or not receiving ERC (control group, n=82 633). After propensity score overlap weighting, Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare groups for the primary composite outcome of all-cause mortality, stroke, or hospitalization with the diagnoses heart failure or myocardial infarction. Most patients (79 948 of 109 739; 72.9%) met the inclusion criteria for EAST-AFNET 4. ERC was associated with a reduced risk for the primary composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75-0.97 [P=0.02]) with largely consistent results between eligible (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.76-1.04 [P=0.14]) or ineligible (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.60-0.98 [P=0.04]) patients for EAST-AFNET 4 trial inclusion. ERC was associated with lower risk of stroke in the overall cohort and in trial-eligible patients. Conclusions This analysis replicates the clinical benefit of ERC seen in EAST-AFNET 4. The results support adoption of ERC as part of the management of recently diagnosed AF in the United States.

AB - Background EAST-AFNET 4 (Early Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation for Stroke Prevention Trial) demonstrated clinical benefit of early rhythm-control therapy (ERC) in patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) and concomitant cardiovascular conditions compared with current guideline-based practice. This study aimed to evaluate the generalizability of EAST-AFNET 4 in routine practice. Methods and Results Using a US administrative database, we identified 109 739 patients with newly diagnosed AF during the enrollment period of EAST-AFNET 4. Patients were classified as either receiving ERC, using AF ablation or antiarrhythmic drug therapy, within the first year after AF diagnosis (n=27 106) or not receiving ERC (control group, n=82 633). After propensity score overlap weighting, Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare groups for the primary composite outcome of all-cause mortality, stroke, or hospitalization with the diagnoses heart failure or myocardial infarction. Most patients (79 948 of 109 739; 72.9%) met the inclusion criteria for EAST-AFNET 4. ERC was associated with a reduced risk for the primary composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75-0.97 [P=0.02]) with largely consistent results between eligible (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.76-1.04 [P=0.14]) or ineligible (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.60-0.98 [P=0.04]) patients for EAST-AFNET 4 trial inclusion. ERC was associated with lower risk of stroke in the overall cohort and in trial-eligible patients. Conclusions This analysis replicates the clinical benefit of ERC seen in EAST-AFNET 4. The results support adoption of ERC as part of the management of recently diagnosed AF in the United States.

KW - Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use

KW - Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy

KW - Catheter Ablation

KW - Humans

KW - Secondary Prevention

KW - Stroke/epidemiology

KW - United States/epidemiology

U2 - 10.1161/JAHA.121.024214

DO - 10.1161/JAHA.121.024214

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 35621202

VL - 11

JO - J AM HEART ASSOC

JF - J AM HEART ASSOC

SN - 2047-9980

IS - 11

M1 - e024214

ER -