Gender differences and outcomes in left ventricular assist device support: The European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support

Standard

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{e9f494cfe72045289a2947ed2ef47826,
title = "Gender differences and outcomes in left ventricular assist device support: The European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing use of ventricular assist devices (VADs), gender differences in indications, hemodynamics, and outcome are not well understood. We examined gender differences and gender-specific predictors for perioperative outcome in patients on ventricular support.METHODS: Multicenter data of 966 patients (median age 55 years, 151 women) from the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS) were analyzed. Median follow-up was 1.26 years.RESULTS: At the time of VAD implantation, women were more often in an unstable condition (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support [INTERMACS] profile 1 and 2) (51.7% vs 41.6% in men), experiencing significantly more often major bleeding (p = 0.0012), arrhythmias (p = 0.022), and right ventricular (RV) failure (p < 0.001) with need for additional RV support. The survival of women on isolated LVAD support was significantly worse (1-year survival 75.5% vs 83.2% in men). Age-adjusted Cox regression analyses showed significant associations with mortality for preoperative inotropic therapy, percutaneous mechanical support, INTERMACS profile 1 and 2, RV dysfunction, major bleeding, cerebral bleeding, ischemic stroke, and RV failure. In women, pump thrombosis was more strongly related with mortality compared to men, while the direction of the association of renal dysfunction with mortality was different for women and men (p-value interaction 0.028 and 0.023, respectively).CONCLUSIONS: Women and men differ in perioperative hemodynamics, adverse events, and mortality after VAD implantation. A gender-dependent association of pump thrombosis with mortality was seen. The impact on treatment practice needs to be shown.",
keywords = "Europe, Female, Heart Failure/surgery, Heart-Assist Devices, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Registries, Sex Factors, Treatment Outcome",
author = "Christina Magnussen and Bernhardt, {Alexander M} and Ojeda, {Francisco M} and Wagner, {Florian M} and Jan Gummert and {de By}, {Theo M M H} and Thomas Krabatsch and Paul Mohacsi and Meike Rybczynski and Dorit Knappe and Bjoern Sill and Tobias Deuse and Stefan Blankenberg and Schnabel, {Renate B} and Hermann Reichenspurner",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2018 International Society for the Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2018",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1016/j.healun.2017.06.016",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "61--70",
journal = "J HEART LUNG TRANSPL",
issn = "1053-2498",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender differences and outcomes in left ventricular assist device support: The European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support

AU - Magnussen, Christina

AU - Bernhardt, Alexander M

AU - Ojeda, Francisco M

AU - Wagner, Florian M

AU - Gummert, Jan

AU - de By, Theo M M H

AU - Krabatsch, Thomas

AU - Mohacsi, Paul

AU - Rybczynski, Meike

AU - Knappe, Dorit

AU - Sill, Bjoern

AU - Deuse, Tobias

AU - Blankenberg, Stefan

AU - Schnabel, Renate B

AU - Reichenspurner, Hermann

N1 - Copyright © 2018 International Society for the Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2018/1

Y1 - 2018/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing use of ventricular assist devices (VADs), gender differences in indications, hemodynamics, and outcome are not well understood. We examined gender differences and gender-specific predictors for perioperative outcome in patients on ventricular support.METHODS: Multicenter data of 966 patients (median age 55 years, 151 women) from the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS) were analyzed. Median follow-up was 1.26 years.RESULTS: At the time of VAD implantation, women were more often in an unstable condition (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support [INTERMACS] profile 1 and 2) (51.7% vs 41.6% in men), experiencing significantly more often major bleeding (p = 0.0012), arrhythmias (p = 0.022), and right ventricular (RV) failure (p < 0.001) with need for additional RV support. The survival of women on isolated LVAD support was significantly worse (1-year survival 75.5% vs 83.2% in men). Age-adjusted Cox regression analyses showed significant associations with mortality for preoperative inotropic therapy, percutaneous mechanical support, INTERMACS profile 1 and 2, RV dysfunction, major bleeding, cerebral bleeding, ischemic stroke, and RV failure. In women, pump thrombosis was more strongly related with mortality compared to men, while the direction of the association of renal dysfunction with mortality was different for women and men (p-value interaction 0.028 and 0.023, respectively).CONCLUSIONS: Women and men differ in perioperative hemodynamics, adverse events, and mortality after VAD implantation. A gender-dependent association of pump thrombosis with mortality was seen. The impact on treatment practice needs to be shown.

AB - BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing use of ventricular assist devices (VADs), gender differences in indications, hemodynamics, and outcome are not well understood. We examined gender differences and gender-specific predictors for perioperative outcome in patients on ventricular support.METHODS: Multicenter data of 966 patients (median age 55 years, 151 women) from the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS) were analyzed. Median follow-up was 1.26 years.RESULTS: At the time of VAD implantation, women were more often in an unstable condition (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support [INTERMACS] profile 1 and 2) (51.7% vs 41.6% in men), experiencing significantly more often major bleeding (p = 0.0012), arrhythmias (p = 0.022), and right ventricular (RV) failure (p < 0.001) with need for additional RV support. The survival of women on isolated LVAD support was significantly worse (1-year survival 75.5% vs 83.2% in men). Age-adjusted Cox regression analyses showed significant associations with mortality for preoperative inotropic therapy, percutaneous mechanical support, INTERMACS profile 1 and 2, RV dysfunction, major bleeding, cerebral bleeding, ischemic stroke, and RV failure. In women, pump thrombosis was more strongly related with mortality compared to men, while the direction of the association of renal dysfunction with mortality was different for women and men (p-value interaction 0.028 and 0.023, respectively).CONCLUSIONS: Women and men differ in perioperative hemodynamics, adverse events, and mortality after VAD implantation. A gender-dependent association of pump thrombosis with mortality was seen. The impact on treatment practice needs to be shown.

KW - Europe

KW - Female

KW - Heart Failure/surgery

KW - Heart-Assist Devices

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Registries

KW - Sex Factors

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.1016/j.healun.2017.06.016

DO - 10.1016/j.healun.2017.06.016

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 28754423

VL - 37

SP - 61

EP - 70

JO - J HEART LUNG TRANSPL

JF - J HEART LUNG TRANSPL

SN - 1053-2498

IS - 1

ER -