Fundus Autofluorescence Imaging in Macular Telangiectasia Type 2: MacTel Study Report Number 9

Standard

Fundus Autofluorescence Imaging in Macular Telangiectasia Type 2: MacTel Study Report Number 9. / Pauleikhoff, Laurenz; Heeren, Tjebo F C; Gliem, Martin; Lim, Ernest; Pauleikhoff, Daniel; Holz, Frank G; Clemons, Traci; Balaskas, Konstantinos; MACTEL STUDY GROUP; Egan, Catherine A; Charbel Issa, Peter.

in: AM J OPHTHALMOL, Jahrgang 228, 08.2021, S. 27-34.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Pauleikhoff, L, Heeren, TFC, Gliem, M, Lim, E, Pauleikhoff, D, Holz, FG, Clemons, T, Balaskas, K, MACTEL STUDY GROUP, Egan, CA & Charbel Issa, P 2021, 'Fundus Autofluorescence Imaging in Macular Telangiectasia Type 2: MacTel Study Report Number 9', AM J OPHTHALMOL, Jg. 228, S. 27-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.022

APA

Pauleikhoff, L., Heeren, T. F. C., Gliem, M., Lim, E., Pauleikhoff, D., Holz, F. G., Clemons, T., Balaskas, K., MACTEL STUDY GROUP, Egan, C. A., & Charbel Issa, P. (2021). Fundus Autofluorescence Imaging in Macular Telangiectasia Type 2: MacTel Study Report Number 9. AM J OPHTHALMOL, 228, 27-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.022

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{67c334e6fe514dc0ad2d69fac6c70bdd,
title = "Fundus Autofluorescence Imaging in Macular Telangiectasia Type 2: MacTel Study Report Number 9",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To investigate the role of fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging in the diagnosis of macular telangiectasia type 2 (MacTel) and to describe disease-associated FAF patterns and their origin.DESIGN: Cross-sectional multicenter study METHODS: FAF images were collected from the multicenter MacTel Natural History Observation and Registry Study. In a first qualitative approach, common FAF phenotypes were defined and correlated with multimodal imaging. We then evaluated how many eyes showed FAF changes, and temporal vs nasal asymmetry of FAF changes was graded. Finally, 100 eyes of MacTel patients and 100 control eyes (50 normal eyes and 50 eyes with other macular diseases) were combined and 2 masked graders assessed the presence of MacTel based on FAF images alone.RESULTS: The study included 807 eyes of 420 patients (33 eyes were excluded owing to poor image quality). Loss of macular pigment, cystoid spaces, pigment plaques, neovascular membranes, and ectatic vascular changes commonly caused characteristic changes on FAF images. All MacTel patients had macular FAF changes in at least 1 eye. In 95% of eyes, these changes were more pronounced temporally than nasally. Common FAF patterns were increased (60%) and mixed/decreased FAF (38%) and/or visibility of vascular changes such as blunted vessels or ectatic capillaries (79%). Based on those features, high diagnostic performance was achieved for detection of the disease based on FAF alone (Youden index up to 0.91).CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that MacTel is consistently associated with disease-specific changes on FAF imaging. Those changes are typically more pronounced in the temporal parafovea.",
keywords = "Cross-Sectional Studies, Fluorescein Angiography/methods, Fundus Oculi, Humans, Macula Lutea/diagnostic imaging, Multimodal Imaging, Ophthalmoscopy/methods, Reproducibility of Results, Retinal Telangiectasis/diagnosis, Retinal Vessels/diagnostic imaging, Tomography, Optical Coherence/methods, Visual Acuity",
author = "Laurenz Pauleikhoff and Heeren, {Tjebo F C} and Martin Gliem and Ernest Lim and Daniel Pauleikhoff and Holz, {Frank G} and Traci Clemons and Konstantinos Balaskas and {MACTEL STUDY GROUP} and Egan, {Catherine A} and {Charbel Issa}, Peter",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2021",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.022",
language = "English",
volume = "228",
pages = "27--34",
journal = "AM J OPHTHALMOL",
issn = "0002-9394",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fundus Autofluorescence Imaging in Macular Telangiectasia Type 2: MacTel Study Report Number 9

AU - Pauleikhoff, Laurenz

AU - Heeren, Tjebo F C

AU - Gliem, Martin

AU - Lim, Ernest

AU - Pauleikhoff, Daniel

AU - Holz, Frank G

AU - Clemons, Traci

AU - Balaskas, Konstantinos

AU - MACTEL STUDY GROUP

AU - Egan, Catherine A

AU - Charbel Issa, Peter

N1 - Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2021/8

Y1 - 2021/8

N2 - PURPOSE: To investigate the role of fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging in the diagnosis of macular telangiectasia type 2 (MacTel) and to describe disease-associated FAF patterns and their origin.DESIGN: Cross-sectional multicenter study METHODS: FAF images were collected from the multicenter MacTel Natural History Observation and Registry Study. In a first qualitative approach, common FAF phenotypes were defined and correlated with multimodal imaging. We then evaluated how many eyes showed FAF changes, and temporal vs nasal asymmetry of FAF changes was graded. Finally, 100 eyes of MacTel patients and 100 control eyes (50 normal eyes and 50 eyes with other macular diseases) were combined and 2 masked graders assessed the presence of MacTel based on FAF images alone.RESULTS: The study included 807 eyes of 420 patients (33 eyes were excluded owing to poor image quality). Loss of macular pigment, cystoid spaces, pigment plaques, neovascular membranes, and ectatic vascular changes commonly caused characteristic changes on FAF images. All MacTel patients had macular FAF changes in at least 1 eye. In 95% of eyes, these changes were more pronounced temporally than nasally. Common FAF patterns were increased (60%) and mixed/decreased FAF (38%) and/or visibility of vascular changes such as blunted vessels or ectatic capillaries (79%). Based on those features, high diagnostic performance was achieved for detection of the disease based on FAF alone (Youden index up to 0.91).CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that MacTel is consistently associated with disease-specific changes on FAF imaging. Those changes are typically more pronounced in the temporal parafovea.

AB - PURPOSE: To investigate the role of fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging in the diagnosis of macular telangiectasia type 2 (MacTel) and to describe disease-associated FAF patterns and their origin.DESIGN: Cross-sectional multicenter study METHODS: FAF images were collected from the multicenter MacTel Natural History Observation and Registry Study. In a first qualitative approach, common FAF phenotypes were defined and correlated with multimodal imaging. We then evaluated how many eyes showed FAF changes, and temporal vs nasal asymmetry of FAF changes was graded. Finally, 100 eyes of MacTel patients and 100 control eyes (50 normal eyes and 50 eyes with other macular diseases) were combined and 2 masked graders assessed the presence of MacTel based on FAF images alone.RESULTS: The study included 807 eyes of 420 patients (33 eyes were excluded owing to poor image quality). Loss of macular pigment, cystoid spaces, pigment plaques, neovascular membranes, and ectatic vascular changes commonly caused characteristic changes on FAF images. All MacTel patients had macular FAF changes in at least 1 eye. In 95% of eyes, these changes were more pronounced temporally than nasally. Common FAF patterns were increased (60%) and mixed/decreased FAF (38%) and/or visibility of vascular changes such as blunted vessels or ectatic capillaries (79%). Based on those features, high diagnostic performance was achieved for detection of the disease based on FAF alone (Youden index up to 0.91).CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that MacTel is consistently associated with disease-specific changes on FAF imaging. Those changes are typically more pronounced in the temporal parafovea.

KW - Cross-Sectional Studies

KW - Fluorescein Angiography/methods

KW - Fundus Oculi

KW - Humans

KW - Macula Lutea/diagnostic imaging

KW - Multimodal Imaging

KW - Ophthalmoscopy/methods

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Retinal Telangiectasis/diagnosis

KW - Retinal Vessels/diagnostic imaging

KW - Tomography, Optical Coherence/methods

KW - Visual Acuity

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.022

DO - 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.022

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 33775659

VL - 228

SP - 27

EP - 34

JO - AM J OPHTHALMOL

JF - AM J OPHTHALMOL

SN - 0002-9394

ER -