PortalPublikationenFrequently Used Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of General...

Frequently Used Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of General Physical Function Were Highly Correlated With a Multitask Performance Outcome Test Battery

Standard

Frequently Used Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of General Physical Function Were Highly Correlated With a Multitask Performance Outcome Test Battery. / Liegl, Gregor; Obbarius, Alexander; Rose, Matthias; Fischer, Kathrin I; Stengel, Andreas; Knebel, Fabian; Buttgereit, Frank; Nolte, Sandra.

in: VALUE HEALTH, Jahrgang 25, Nr. 10, 10.2022, S. 1752-1759.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung

Harvard

Liegl, G, Obbarius, A, Rose, M, Fischer, KI, Stengel, A, Knebel, F, Buttgereit, F & Nolte, S 2022, 'Frequently Used Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of General Physical Function Were Highly Correlated With a Multitask Performance Outcome Test Battery', VALUE HEALTH, Jg. 25, Nr. 10, S. 1752-1759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2022.05.008

APA

Liegl, G., Obbarius, A., Rose, M., Fischer, K. I., Stengel, A., Knebel, F., Buttgereit, F., & Nolte, S. (2022). Frequently Used Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of General Physical Function Were Highly Correlated With a Multitask Performance Outcome Test Battery. VALUE HEALTH, 25(10), 1752-1759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2022.05.008

Vancouver

Liegl G, Obbarius A, Rose M, Fischer KI, Stengel A, Knebel F et al. Frequently Used Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of General Physical Function Were Highly Correlated With a Multitask Performance Outcome Test Battery. VALUE HEALTH. 2022 Okt;25(10):1752-1759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2022.05.008

Bibtex

@article{55d9ada7d60b4a199defab5ba1734720,
title = "Frequently Used Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of General Physical Function Were Highly Correlated With a Multitask Performance Outcome Test Battery",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the relationship between frequently used patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures and a multitask performance outcome (PerfO) measure of general physical function (PF) and to examine the association of these measures with depressive mood, pain, and age.METHODS: Frequently used PRO measures of general PF (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] PF item bank, PROMIS PF Short Form 20a, Short Form 36 Physical Function Scale) and a PerfO test battery, namely, the Physical Performance Test (PPT), were administered to 78 adult patients from 3 inpatient clinics (cardiology and angiology, rheumatology and clinical immunology, and psychosomatic medicine) at Charit{\'e} - Universit{\"a}tsmedizin Berlin. Pearson correlations were used to investigate the associations between PRO measures and the PPT. To explore the predictive value of age, depressive symptoms, and pain intensity, we conducted multiple linear regression analysis for each PF measure.RESULTS: We found strong linear relationships between PRO measures and PPT sum scores. Correlations between PPT sum scores and PROMIS PF T-scores were r > 0.75. For all PRO and PerfO measures, age was a predictor of general PF whereas depressive mood was not found to be a relevant predictor. Moreover, pain intensity was found to be a significant predictor of PRO measures but not for PPT sum scores.CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that frequently used PRO measures and a multitask PerfO measure of general PF can be used to measure a common PF construct. Nevertheless, PF scores based on PRO measures should ideally be controlled for self-rated pain intensity.",
keywords = "Adult, Humans, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Pain Measurement, Patient Reported Outcome Measures",
author = "Gregor Liegl and Alexander Obbarius and Matthias Rose and Fischer, {Kathrin I} and Andreas Stengel and Fabian Knebel and Frank Buttgereit and Sandra Nolte",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.",
year = "2022",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1016/j.jval.2022.05.008",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "1752--1759",
journal = "VALUE HEALTH",
issn = "1098-3015",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Frequently Used Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of General Physical Function Were Highly Correlated With a Multitask Performance Outcome Test Battery

AU - Liegl, Gregor

AU - Obbarius, Alexander

AU - Rose, Matthias

AU - Fischer, Kathrin I

AU - Stengel, Andreas

AU - Knebel, Fabian

AU - Buttgereit, Frank

AU - Nolte, Sandra

N1 - Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.

PY - 2022/10

Y1 - 2022/10

N2 - OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the relationship between frequently used patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures and a multitask performance outcome (PerfO) measure of general physical function (PF) and to examine the association of these measures with depressive mood, pain, and age.METHODS: Frequently used PRO measures of general PF (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] PF item bank, PROMIS PF Short Form 20a, Short Form 36 Physical Function Scale) and a PerfO test battery, namely, the Physical Performance Test (PPT), were administered to 78 adult patients from 3 inpatient clinics (cardiology and angiology, rheumatology and clinical immunology, and psychosomatic medicine) at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin. Pearson correlations were used to investigate the associations between PRO measures and the PPT. To explore the predictive value of age, depressive symptoms, and pain intensity, we conducted multiple linear regression analysis for each PF measure.RESULTS: We found strong linear relationships between PRO measures and PPT sum scores. Correlations between PPT sum scores and PROMIS PF T-scores were r > 0.75. For all PRO and PerfO measures, age was a predictor of general PF whereas depressive mood was not found to be a relevant predictor. Moreover, pain intensity was found to be a significant predictor of PRO measures but not for PPT sum scores.CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that frequently used PRO measures and a multitask PerfO measure of general PF can be used to measure a common PF construct. Nevertheless, PF scores based on PRO measures should ideally be controlled for self-rated pain intensity.

AB - OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the relationship between frequently used patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures and a multitask performance outcome (PerfO) measure of general physical function (PF) and to examine the association of these measures with depressive mood, pain, and age.METHODS: Frequently used PRO measures of general PF (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] PF item bank, PROMIS PF Short Form 20a, Short Form 36 Physical Function Scale) and a PerfO test battery, namely, the Physical Performance Test (PPT), were administered to 78 adult patients from 3 inpatient clinics (cardiology and angiology, rheumatology and clinical immunology, and psychosomatic medicine) at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin. Pearson correlations were used to investigate the associations between PRO measures and the PPT. To explore the predictive value of age, depressive symptoms, and pain intensity, we conducted multiple linear regression analysis for each PF measure.RESULTS: We found strong linear relationships between PRO measures and PPT sum scores. Correlations between PPT sum scores and PROMIS PF T-scores were r > 0.75. For all PRO and PerfO measures, age was a predictor of general PF whereas depressive mood was not found to be a relevant predictor. Moreover, pain intensity was found to be a significant predictor of PRO measures but not for PPT sum scores.CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that frequently used PRO measures and a multitask PerfO measure of general PF can be used to measure a common PF construct. Nevertheless, PF scores based on PRO measures should ideally be controlled for self-rated pain intensity.

KW - Adult

KW - Humans

KW - Outcome Assessment, Health Care

KW - Pain Measurement

KW - Patient Reported Outcome Measures

U2 - 10.1016/j.jval.2022.05.008

DO - 10.1016/j.jval.2022.05.008

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 35701324

VL - 25

SP - 1752

EP - 1759

JO - VALUE HEALTH

JF - VALUE HEALTH

SN - 1098-3015

IS - 10

ER -