Frequency and network analysis of depressive symptoms in patients with cancer compared to the general population
Standard
Frequency and network analysis of depressive symptoms in patients with cancer compared to the general population. / Hartung, Tim J; Fried, Eiko I; Mehnert, Anja; Hinz, Andreas; Vehling, Sigrun.
in: J AFFECT DISORDERS, Jahrgang 256, 01.09.2019, S. 295-301.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Frequency and network analysis of depressive symptoms in patients with cancer compared to the general population
AU - Hartung, Tim J
AU - Fried, Eiko I
AU - Mehnert, Anja
AU - Hinz, Andreas
AU - Vehling, Sigrun
N1 - Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/9/1
Y1 - 2019/9/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: The use of sum scores of depressive symptoms has been increasingly criticized and may be particularly problematic in oncological settings. Frameworks analyzing individual symptoms and their interrelationships such as network analysis represent an emerging alternative.METHODS: We aimed to assess frequencies and interrelationships of 9 DSM-5 symptom criteria of major depression reported in the PHQ-9 questionnaire by 4020 patients with cancer and 4020 controls from the general population. We estimated unregularized Gaussian graphical models for both samples and compared network structures as well as predictability and centrality of individual symptoms.RESULTS: Depressive symptoms were more frequent, but less strongly intercorrelated in patients with cancer than in the general population. The overall network structure differed significantly between samples (correlation of adjacency matrices: rho=0.73, largest between-group difference in any edge weight: 0.20, p < 0.0001). Post-hoc tests showed significant differences in interrelationships for four symptom pairs. The mean variance of symptoms explained by all other symptoms in the same network was lower among cancer patients than in the general population (29% vs. 43%).LIMITATIONS: Cross-sectional data do not allow for temporal or causal inferences about the directions of associations and results from population-based samples may not apply to clinical psychiatric populations.CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cancer, both somatic and cognitive/affective depression symptoms are less likely to be explained by other depressive symptoms than in the general population. Rather than assuming a consistent depression construct, future research should study individual depressive symptom patterns and their potential causes in patients with cancer.
AB - BACKGROUND: The use of sum scores of depressive symptoms has been increasingly criticized and may be particularly problematic in oncological settings. Frameworks analyzing individual symptoms and their interrelationships such as network analysis represent an emerging alternative.METHODS: We aimed to assess frequencies and interrelationships of 9 DSM-5 symptom criteria of major depression reported in the PHQ-9 questionnaire by 4020 patients with cancer and 4020 controls from the general population. We estimated unregularized Gaussian graphical models for both samples and compared network structures as well as predictability and centrality of individual symptoms.RESULTS: Depressive symptoms were more frequent, but less strongly intercorrelated in patients with cancer than in the general population. The overall network structure differed significantly between samples (correlation of adjacency matrices: rho=0.73, largest between-group difference in any edge weight: 0.20, p < 0.0001). Post-hoc tests showed significant differences in interrelationships for four symptom pairs. The mean variance of symptoms explained by all other symptoms in the same network was lower among cancer patients than in the general population (29% vs. 43%).LIMITATIONS: Cross-sectional data do not allow for temporal or causal inferences about the directions of associations and results from population-based samples may not apply to clinical psychiatric populations.CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cancer, both somatic and cognitive/affective depression symptoms are less likely to be explained by other depressive symptoms than in the general population. Rather than assuming a consistent depression construct, future research should study individual depressive symptom patterns and their potential causes in patients with cancer.
KW - Adult
KW - Affective Symptoms
KW - Cross-Sectional Studies
KW - Depression/psychology
KW - Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology
KW - Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Neoplasms/psychology
KW - Surveys and Questionnaires
U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2019.06.009
DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2019.06.009
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 31200167
VL - 256
SP - 295
EP - 301
JO - J AFFECT DISORDERS
JF - J AFFECT DISORDERS
SN - 0165-0327
ER -