FESS und Ausbildung
Standard
FESS und Ausbildung : Wo liegen die Probleme? / Braun, T; Betz, C S; Stelter, K; Leunig, A.
in: LARYNGO RHINO OTOL, Jahrgang 90, Nr. 1, 01.2011, S. 10-4.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Review › Forschung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - FESS und Ausbildung
T2 - Wo liegen die Probleme?
AU - Braun, T
AU - Betz, C S
AU - Stelter, K
AU - Leunig, A
N1 - © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
PY - 2011/1
Y1 - 2011/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: The literature lacks studies analyzing the specific problems of colleagues in the surgical training for FESS. The presented date can help to systematically improve the training.METHODS: The participants of the 11 (th) Munich FESS Course were asked about problems occurring during dissection and about their opinion how the training could be improved.RESULTS: Handling of instruments and endocopes was only a problem for participants without any experience in FESS. The majority of the participants, independently from their training level, considered infundibulotomy and anterior ethmoidectomy the easiest dissection steps. Participants with and without FESS experience regarded a more extensive study of anatomy in the forefront as the most important toehold in the improvement of the surgical training. Virtually all participants stated that the course improved their anatomical knowledge, their confidence on the patient, and their surgical skills.CONCLUSIONS: FESS dissection courses are well accepted and considered as beneficial by surgical trainees. An exhaustive private study of anatomy is essential. For beginners with FESS, infundibulotomies and anterior ethmoidectomies should preferentially be chosen.
AB - BACKGROUND: The literature lacks studies analyzing the specific problems of colleagues in the surgical training for FESS. The presented date can help to systematically improve the training.METHODS: The participants of the 11 (th) Munich FESS Course were asked about problems occurring during dissection and about their opinion how the training could be improved.RESULTS: Handling of instruments and endocopes was only a problem for participants without any experience in FESS. The majority of the participants, independently from their training level, considered infundibulotomy and anterior ethmoidectomy the easiest dissection steps. Participants with and without FESS experience regarded a more extensive study of anatomy in the forefront as the most important toehold in the improvement of the surgical training. Virtually all participants stated that the course improved their anatomical knowledge, their confidence on the patient, and their surgical skills.CONCLUSIONS: FESS dissection courses are well accepted and considered as beneficial by surgical trainees. An exhaustive private study of anatomy is essential. For beginners with FESS, infundibulotomies and anterior ethmoidectomies should preferentially be chosen.
KW - Adult
KW - Attitude of Health Personnel
KW - Curriculum
KW - Dissection
KW - Education, Medical, Continuing
KW - Endoscopy
KW - Female
KW - Germany
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Microsurgery
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures
KW - Paranasal Sinuses
KW - Surgical Instruments
KW - Surveys and Questionnaires
KW - English Abstract
KW - Journal Article
KW - Review
U2 - 10.1055/s-0030-1267939
DO - 10.1055/s-0030-1267939
M3 - SCORING: Review
C2 - 21225530
VL - 90
SP - 10
EP - 14
JO - LARYNGO RHINO OTOL
JF - LARYNGO RHINO OTOL
SN - 0935-8943
IS - 1
ER -