FESS und Ausbildung

Standard

FESS und Ausbildung : Wo liegen die Probleme? / Braun, T; Betz, C S; Stelter, K; Leunig, A.

in: LARYNGO RHINO OTOL, Jahrgang 90, Nr. 1, 01.2011, S. 10-4.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ReviewForschung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{148df41b21324206ac285e61f2ad1cef,
title = "FESS und Ausbildung: Wo liegen die Probleme?",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The literature lacks studies analyzing the specific problems of colleagues in the surgical training for FESS. The presented date can help to systematically improve the training.METHODS: The participants of the 11 (th) Munich FESS Course were asked about problems occurring during dissection and about their opinion how the training could be improved.RESULTS: Handling of instruments and endocopes was only a problem for participants without any experience in FESS. The majority of the participants, independently from their training level, considered infundibulotomy and anterior ethmoidectomy the easiest dissection steps. Participants with and without FESS experience regarded a more extensive study of anatomy in the forefront as the most important toehold in the improvement of the surgical training. Virtually all participants stated that the course improved their anatomical knowledge, their confidence on the patient, and their surgical skills.CONCLUSIONS: FESS dissection courses are well accepted and considered as beneficial by surgical trainees. An exhaustive private study of anatomy is essential. For beginners with FESS, infundibulotomies and anterior ethmoidectomies should preferentially be chosen.",
keywords = "Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Curriculum, Dissection, Education, Medical, Continuing, Endoscopy, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Microsurgery, Middle Aged, Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures, Paranasal Sinuses, Surgical Instruments, Surveys and Questionnaires, English Abstract, Journal Article, Review",
author = "T Braun and Betz, {C S} and K Stelter and A Leunig",
note = "{\textcopyright} Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.",
year = "2011",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1055/s-0030-1267939",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "90",
pages = "10--4",
journal = "LARYNGO RHINO OTOL",
issn = "0935-8943",
publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag KG",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - FESS und Ausbildung

T2 - Wo liegen die Probleme?

AU - Braun, T

AU - Betz, C S

AU - Stelter, K

AU - Leunig, A

N1 - © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: The literature lacks studies analyzing the specific problems of colleagues in the surgical training for FESS. The presented date can help to systematically improve the training.METHODS: The participants of the 11 (th) Munich FESS Course were asked about problems occurring during dissection and about their opinion how the training could be improved.RESULTS: Handling of instruments and endocopes was only a problem for participants without any experience in FESS. The majority of the participants, independently from their training level, considered infundibulotomy and anterior ethmoidectomy the easiest dissection steps. Participants with and without FESS experience regarded a more extensive study of anatomy in the forefront as the most important toehold in the improvement of the surgical training. Virtually all participants stated that the course improved their anatomical knowledge, their confidence on the patient, and their surgical skills.CONCLUSIONS: FESS dissection courses are well accepted and considered as beneficial by surgical trainees. An exhaustive private study of anatomy is essential. For beginners with FESS, infundibulotomies and anterior ethmoidectomies should preferentially be chosen.

AB - BACKGROUND: The literature lacks studies analyzing the specific problems of colleagues in the surgical training for FESS. The presented date can help to systematically improve the training.METHODS: The participants of the 11 (th) Munich FESS Course were asked about problems occurring during dissection and about their opinion how the training could be improved.RESULTS: Handling of instruments and endocopes was only a problem for participants without any experience in FESS. The majority of the participants, independently from their training level, considered infundibulotomy and anterior ethmoidectomy the easiest dissection steps. Participants with and without FESS experience regarded a more extensive study of anatomy in the forefront as the most important toehold in the improvement of the surgical training. Virtually all participants stated that the course improved their anatomical knowledge, their confidence on the patient, and their surgical skills.CONCLUSIONS: FESS dissection courses are well accepted and considered as beneficial by surgical trainees. An exhaustive private study of anatomy is essential. For beginners with FESS, infundibulotomies and anterior ethmoidectomies should preferentially be chosen.

KW - Adult

KW - Attitude of Health Personnel

KW - Curriculum

KW - Dissection

KW - Education, Medical, Continuing

KW - Endoscopy

KW - Female

KW - Germany

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Microsurgery

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures

KW - Paranasal Sinuses

KW - Surgical Instruments

KW - Surveys and Questionnaires

KW - English Abstract

KW - Journal Article

KW - Review

U2 - 10.1055/s-0030-1267939

DO - 10.1055/s-0030-1267939

M3 - SCORING: Review

C2 - 21225530

VL - 90

SP - 10

EP - 14

JO - LARYNGO RHINO OTOL

JF - LARYNGO RHINO OTOL

SN - 0935-8943

IS - 1

ER -