Factors affecting the unexpected failure of DCE-MRI to determine the optimal biological dose of the vascular targeting agent NGR-hTNF in solid cancer patients.

Standard

Factors affecting the unexpected failure of DCE-MRI to determine the optimal biological dose of the vascular targeting agent NGR-hTNF in solid cancer patients. / Desar, [Unbekannt]; Ingrid, M E; Herpen, van; Carla, M L; Asten, van; Jack, J A; Fiedler, Walter; Walter, [Unbekannt]; Marreaud, [Unbekannt]; Sandrine, [Unbekannt]; Timmer-Bonte, [Unbekannt]; Johanna, N H; Ter, Voert; Edwin, G W; Lambiase, [Unbekannt]; Antonio, [Unbekannt]; Bordignon, [Unbekannt]; Claudio, [Unbekannt]; Heerschap, [Unbekannt]; Arend, [Unbekannt]; Laarhoven, van; Hanneke, W M.

in: EUR J RADIOL, Jahrgang 80, Nr. 3, 3, 2011, S. 655-661.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Desar, U, Ingrid, ME, Herpen, V, Carla, ML, Asten, V, Jack, JA, Fiedler, W, Walter, U, Marreaud, U, Sandrine, U, Timmer-Bonte, U, Johanna, NH, Ter, V, Edwin, GW, Lambiase, U, Antonio, U, Bordignon, U, Claudio, U, Heerschap, U, Arend, U, Laarhoven, V & Hanneke, WM 2011, 'Factors affecting the unexpected failure of DCE-MRI to determine the optimal biological dose of the vascular targeting agent NGR-hTNF in solid cancer patients.', EUR J RADIOL, Jg. 80, Nr. 3, 3, S. 655-661. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20863638?dopt=Citation>

APA

Desar, U., Ingrid, M. E., Herpen, V., Carla, M. L., Asten, V., Jack, J. A., Fiedler, W., Walter, U., Marreaud, U., Sandrine, U., Timmer-Bonte, U., Johanna, N. H., Ter, V., Edwin, G. W., Lambiase, U., Antonio, U., Bordignon, U., Claudio, U., Heerschap, U., ... Hanneke, W. M. (2011). Factors affecting the unexpected failure of DCE-MRI to determine the optimal biological dose of the vascular targeting agent NGR-hTNF in solid cancer patients. EUR J RADIOL, 80(3), 655-661. [3]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20863638?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{6021ef4292ec415b9c47b01806e5cc67,
title = "Factors affecting the unexpected failure of DCE-MRI to determine the optimal biological dose of the vascular targeting agent NGR-hTNF in solid cancer patients.",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: To understand which factors could affect the assessment of anti-vascular treatment by DCE-MRI, we investigated possible causes that could have hampered the selection of an optimal biological dose in humans of the vascular targeted agent NGR-hTNF by DCE-MRI: (1) insufficient reproducibility of DCE-MRI; (2) less specific targeting of NGR-hTNF; (3) interference of vessel characteristics with NGR-hTNF efficacy; (4) interfering pharmacodynamic effects. EXPERIMENTAL: In a phase I study NGR-hTNF, DCE-MRI was performed at baseline and 2h after NGR-hTNF administration in 31 patients with advanced solid cancer. Reproducibility measurements were performed in 5 other non-treated patients with metastatic disease. Mean k(ep), K(trans) values and their histogram distribution were determined in metastases and healthy liver tissue. The correlation between tumour size and DCE-MRI parameters was determined. Kinetics of soluble TNF receptors and the development of anti-TNF antibodies were assessed. RESULTS: Reproducibility of the DCE-MRI technique was adequate. Mean DCE-MRI parameters did not significantly change after NGR-hTNF administration, but histogram analyses showed significant changes in metastases and healthy liver tissue in some patients. The anti-vascular effects of NGR-hTNF were larger in smaller tumours, which have less mature neovasculature. Soluble TNF receptors were released. CONCLUSIONS: The difficulty to find an optimal biological dose of NGR-TNF by DCE-MRI is likely caused by a combination of factors: (i) different profiles of early anti-vascular effects in tumours and healthy liver tissue, (ii) dependence of the magnitude of the anti-vascular effect of NGR-hTNF on tumour size and (iii) shedding kinetics of soluble TNF receptors.",
author = "[Unbekannt] Desar and Ingrid, {M E} and van Herpen and Carla, {M L} and van Asten and Jack, {J A} and Walter Fiedler and [Unbekannt] Walter and [Unbekannt] Marreaud and [Unbekannt] Sandrine and [Unbekannt] Timmer-Bonte and Johanna, {N H} and Voert Ter and Edwin, {G W} and [Unbekannt] Lambiase and [Unbekannt] Antonio and [Unbekannt] Bordignon and [Unbekannt] Claudio and [Unbekannt] Heerschap and [Unbekannt] Arend and van Laarhoven and Hanneke, {W M}",
year = "2011",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "80",
pages = "655--661",
journal = "EUR J RADIOL",
issn = "0720-048X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors affecting the unexpected failure of DCE-MRI to determine the optimal biological dose of the vascular targeting agent NGR-hTNF in solid cancer patients.

AU - Desar, [Unbekannt]

AU - Ingrid, M E

AU - Herpen, van

AU - Carla, M L

AU - Asten, van

AU - Jack, J A

AU - Fiedler, Walter

AU - Walter, [Unbekannt]

AU - Marreaud, [Unbekannt]

AU - Sandrine, [Unbekannt]

AU - Timmer-Bonte, [Unbekannt]

AU - Johanna, N H

AU - Ter, Voert

AU - Edwin, G W

AU - Lambiase, [Unbekannt]

AU - Antonio, [Unbekannt]

AU - Bordignon, [Unbekannt]

AU - Claudio, [Unbekannt]

AU - Heerschap, [Unbekannt]

AU - Arend, [Unbekannt]

AU - Laarhoven, van

AU - Hanneke, W M

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - INTRODUCTION: To understand which factors could affect the assessment of anti-vascular treatment by DCE-MRI, we investigated possible causes that could have hampered the selection of an optimal biological dose in humans of the vascular targeted agent NGR-hTNF by DCE-MRI: (1) insufficient reproducibility of DCE-MRI; (2) less specific targeting of NGR-hTNF; (3) interference of vessel characteristics with NGR-hTNF efficacy; (4) interfering pharmacodynamic effects. EXPERIMENTAL: In a phase I study NGR-hTNF, DCE-MRI was performed at baseline and 2h after NGR-hTNF administration in 31 patients with advanced solid cancer. Reproducibility measurements were performed in 5 other non-treated patients with metastatic disease. Mean k(ep), K(trans) values and their histogram distribution were determined in metastases and healthy liver tissue. The correlation between tumour size and DCE-MRI parameters was determined. Kinetics of soluble TNF receptors and the development of anti-TNF antibodies were assessed. RESULTS: Reproducibility of the DCE-MRI technique was adequate. Mean DCE-MRI parameters did not significantly change after NGR-hTNF administration, but histogram analyses showed significant changes in metastases and healthy liver tissue in some patients. The anti-vascular effects of NGR-hTNF were larger in smaller tumours, which have less mature neovasculature. Soluble TNF receptors were released. CONCLUSIONS: The difficulty to find an optimal biological dose of NGR-TNF by DCE-MRI is likely caused by a combination of factors: (i) different profiles of early anti-vascular effects in tumours and healthy liver tissue, (ii) dependence of the magnitude of the anti-vascular effect of NGR-hTNF on tumour size and (iii) shedding kinetics of soluble TNF receptors.

AB - INTRODUCTION: To understand which factors could affect the assessment of anti-vascular treatment by DCE-MRI, we investigated possible causes that could have hampered the selection of an optimal biological dose in humans of the vascular targeted agent NGR-hTNF by DCE-MRI: (1) insufficient reproducibility of DCE-MRI; (2) less specific targeting of NGR-hTNF; (3) interference of vessel characteristics with NGR-hTNF efficacy; (4) interfering pharmacodynamic effects. EXPERIMENTAL: In a phase I study NGR-hTNF, DCE-MRI was performed at baseline and 2h after NGR-hTNF administration in 31 patients with advanced solid cancer. Reproducibility measurements were performed in 5 other non-treated patients with metastatic disease. Mean k(ep), K(trans) values and their histogram distribution were determined in metastases and healthy liver tissue. The correlation between tumour size and DCE-MRI parameters was determined. Kinetics of soluble TNF receptors and the development of anti-TNF antibodies were assessed. RESULTS: Reproducibility of the DCE-MRI technique was adequate. Mean DCE-MRI parameters did not significantly change after NGR-hTNF administration, but histogram analyses showed significant changes in metastases and healthy liver tissue in some patients. The anti-vascular effects of NGR-hTNF were larger in smaller tumours, which have less mature neovasculature. Soluble TNF receptors were released. CONCLUSIONS: The difficulty to find an optimal biological dose of NGR-TNF by DCE-MRI is likely caused by a combination of factors: (i) different profiles of early anti-vascular effects in tumours and healthy liver tissue, (ii) dependence of the magnitude of the anti-vascular effect of NGR-hTNF on tumour size and (iii) shedding kinetics of soluble TNF receptors.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 80

SP - 655

EP - 661

JO - EUR J RADIOL

JF - EUR J RADIOL

SN - 0720-048X

IS - 3

M1 - 3

ER -