PortalPublikationen[Expert opinions of forensic psychiatrists regarding laws of...

[Expert opinions of forensic psychiatrists regarding laws of subsequent preventive detention].

Standard

[Expert opinions of forensic psychiatrists regarding laws of subsequent preventive detention]. / Basdekis-Josza, Raphaela; Briken, Peer.

in: PSYCHIAT PRAX, Jahrgang 39, Nr. 6, 6, 2012, S. 293-295.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung

Harvard

Basdekis-Josza, R & Briken, P 2012, '[Expert opinions of forensic psychiatrists regarding laws of subsequent preventive detention].', PSYCHIAT PRAX, Jg. 39, Nr. 6, 6, S. 293-295. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22926794?dopt=Citation>

APA

Basdekis-Josza, R., & Briken, P. (2012). [Expert opinions of forensic psychiatrists regarding laws of subsequent preventive detention]. PSYCHIAT PRAX, 39(6), 293-295. [6]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22926794?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Basdekis-Josza R, Briken P. [Expert opinions of forensic psychiatrists regarding laws of subsequent preventive detention]. PSYCHIAT PRAX. 2012;39(6):293-295. 6.

Bibtex

@article{75c7edcc87964020a3562695fba02be0,
title = "[Expert opinions of forensic psychiatrists regarding laws of subsequent preventive detention].",
abstract = "With regard to changes in the German law of preventive detention--a sentence handed down to offenders who committed a grave offence and are considered a danger to public safety, similar to the preventive detention law in New Zealand--an online survey amongst forensic psychiatrists has been conducted between July and October 2011. Questions have been raised regarding the necessity of preventive detention, subsequent preventive detention (the possibility of imposing {"}preventive detention{"} after sentencing, which was ruled a violation of the European Convention of Human Rights by the European Court of Human Rights), and the Therapy Placement Act from January 1st, 2011.",
keywords = "Germany, Humans, Questionnaires, Cooperative Behavior, Interdisciplinary Communication, Data Collection, Expert Testimony/legislation & jurisprudence, *Attitude of Health Personnel, Advisory Committees, Commitment of Mentally Ill/*legislation & jurisprudence, *Dangerous Behavior, *Forensic Psychiatry, Human Rights/legislation & jurisprudence, Mental Disorders/*diagnosis/psychology/*therapy, Prisoners/*legislation & jurisprudence/*psychology, Security Measures/*legislation & jurisprudence, Germany, Humans, Questionnaires, Cooperative Behavior, Interdisciplinary Communication, Data Collection, Expert Testimony/legislation & jurisprudence, *Attitude of Health Personnel, Advisory Committees, Commitment of Mentally Ill/*legislation & jurisprudence, *Dangerous Behavior, *Forensic Psychiatry, Human Rights/legislation & jurisprudence, Mental Disorders/*diagnosis/psychology/*therapy, Prisoners/*legislation & jurisprudence/*psychology, Security Measures/*legislation & jurisprudence",
author = "Raphaela Basdekis-Josza and Peer Briken",
year = "2012",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "39",
pages = "293--295",
journal = "PSYCHIAT PRAX",
issn = "0303-4259",
publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag KG",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - [Expert opinions of forensic psychiatrists regarding laws of subsequent preventive detention].

AU - Basdekis-Josza, Raphaela

AU - Briken, Peer

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - With regard to changes in the German law of preventive detention--a sentence handed down to offenders who committed a grave offence and are considered a danger to public safety, similar to the preventive detention law in New Zealand--an online survey amongst forensic psychiatrists has been conducted between July and October 2011. Questions have been raised regarding the necessity of preventive detention, subsequent preventive detention (the possibility of imposing "preventive detention" after sentencing, which was ruled a violation of the European Convention of Human Rights by the European Court of Human Rights), and the Therapy Placement Act from January 1st, 2011.

AB - With regard to changes in the German law of preventive detention--a sentence handed down to offenders who committed a grave offence and are considered a danger to public safety, similar to the preventive detention law in New Zealand--an online survey amongst forensic psychiatrists has been conducted between July and October 2011. Questions have been raised regarding the necessity of preventive detention, subsequent preventive detention (the possibility of imposing "preventive detention" after sentencing, which was ruled a violation of the European Convention of Human Rights by the European Court of Human Rights), and the Therapy Placement Act from January 1st, 2011.

KW - Germany

KW - Humans

KW - Questionnaires

KW - Cooperative Behavior

KW - Interdisciplinary Communication

KW - Data Collection

KW - Expert Testimony/legislation & jurisprudence

KW - Attitude of Health Personnel

KW - Advisory Committees

KW - Commitment of Mentally Ill/legislation & jurisprudence

KW - Dangerous Behavior

KW - Forensic Psychiatry

KW - Human Rights/legislation & jurisprudence

KW - Mental Disorders/diagnosis/psychology/therapy

KW - Prisoners/legislation & jurisprudence/psychology

KW - Security Measures/legislation & jurisprudence

KW - Germany

KW - Humans

KW - Questionnaires

KW - Cooperative Behavior

KW - Interdisciplinary Communication

KW - Data Collection

KW - Expert Testimony/legislation & jurisprudence

KW - Attitude of Health Personnel

KW - Advisory Committees

KW - Commitment of Mentally Ill/legislation & jurisprudence

KW - Dangerous Behavior

KW - Forensic Psychiatry

KW - Human Rights/legislation & jurisprudence

KW - Mental Disorders/diagnosis/psychology/therapy

KW - Prisoners/legislation & jurisprudence/psychology

KW - Security Measures/legislation & jurisprudence

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 39

SP - 293

EP - 295

JO - PSYCHIAT PRAX

JF - PSYCHIAT PRAX

SN - 0303-4259

IS - 6

M1 - 6

ER -