Expansion of the donor pool in liver transplantation: the Hannover experience 1996-2002.

Standard

Expansion of the donor pool in liver transplantation: the Hannover experience 1996-2002. / Nashan, Björn; Lück, Rainer; Becker, Thomas; Grannas, Gerrit; Strassburg, C; Schneider, A; Melter, M; Strassburg, A; Klempnauer, Jürgen.

in: CLIN TRANSPLANT, 2002, S. 221-228.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Nashan, B, Lück, R, Becker, T, Grannas, G, Strassburg, C, Schneider, A, Melter, M, Strassburg, A & Klempnauer, J 2002, 'Expansion of the donor pool in liver transplantation: the Hannover experience 1996-2002.', CLIN TRANSPLANT, S. 221-228. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12971453?dopt=Citation>

APA

Nashan, B., Lück, R., Becker, T., Grannas, G., Strassburg, C., Schneider, A., Melter, M., Strassburg, A., & Klempnauer, J. (2002). Expansion of the donor pool in liver transplantation: the Hannover experience 1996-2002. CLIN TRANSPLANT, 221-228. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12971453?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Nashan B, Lück R, Becker T, Grannas G, Strassburg C, Schneider A et al. Expansion of the donor pool in liver transplantation: the Hannover experience 1996-2002. CLIN TRANSPLANT. 2002;221-228.

Bibtex

@article{4ec35a52ca5049f1a83735c38e84562e,
title = "Expansion of the donor pool in liver transplantation: the Hannover experience 1996-2002.",
abstract = "In the past decade liver transplantation has become the standard therapy for terminal liver failure. An increasing organ shortage, specific regional allocation systems within the Eurotransplant area and the lack of an efficient system to identify donors have resulted in decreasing numbers of liver transplants. Approximately 20% of patients are dying on the waiting list, a list that has exploded in numbers and waiting time in the past 3 years. In particular children and small adults are put at a disadvantage since standard donors have standard size livers. Two options to solve this dilemma are the expanded use of split-liver and living-donor liver transplantation. The specific experiences applying these techniques at the Medizinische Hochschule Hannover are discussed and compared with the results given in the European Liver Transplant Registry. The retrospective analysis demonstrates a shift in the use of resources, with decreasing numbers of full-size cadaver liver transplants and an increase in split- and living-donor liver transplantation. Both techniques are limited to specific patient populations, a notion that has to be considered in the comparison of results and outcome. According to our experience the full-size cadaver liver is still the standard option, while other techniques require careful attention to the chosen recipient population, advanced surgical skills and, for living donors, as a sine qua non the prerequisite of nihil nocere.",
author = "Bj{\"o}rn Nashan and Rainer L{\"u}ck and Thomas Becker and Gerrit Grannas and C Strassburg and A Schneider and M Melter and A Strassburg and J{\"u}rgen Klempnauer",
year = "2002",
language = "Deutsch",
pages = "221--228",
journal = "CLIN TRANSPLANT",
issn = "0902-0063",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Expansion of the donor pool in liver transplantation: the Hannover experience 1996-2002.

AU - Nashan, Björn

AU - Lück, Rainer

AU - Becker, Thomas

AU - Grannas, Gerrit

AU - Strassburg, C

AU - Schneider, A

AU - Melter, M

AU - Strassburg, A

AU - Klempnauer, Jürgen

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - In the past decade liver transplantation has become the standard therapy for terminal liver failure. An increasing organ shortage, specific regional allocation systems within the Eurotransplant area and the lack of an efficient system to identify donors have resulted in decreasing numbers of liver transplants. Approximately 20% of patients are dying on the waiting list, a list that has exploded in numbers and waiting time in the past 3 years. In particular children and small adults are put at a disadvantage since standard donors have standard size livers. Two options to solve this dilemma are the expanded use of split-liver and living-donor liver transplantation. The specific experiences applying these techniques at the Medizinische Hochschule Hannover are discussed and compared with the results given in the European Liver Transplant Registry. The retrospective analysis demonstrates a shift in the use of resources, with decreasing numbers of full-size cadaver liver transplants and an increase in split- and living-donor liver transplantation. Both techniques are limited to specific patient populations, a notion that has to be considered in the comparison of results and outcome. According to our experience the full-size cadaver liver is still the standard option, while other techniques require careful attention to the chosen recipient population, advanced surgical skills and, for living donors, as a sine qua non the prerequisite of nihil nocere.

AB - In the past decade liver transplantation has become the standard therapy for terminal liver failure. An increasing organ shortage, specific regional allocation systems within the Eurotransplant area and the lack of an efficient system to identify donors have resulted in decreasing numbers of liver transplants. Approximately 20% of patients are dying on the waiting list, a list that has exploded in numbers and waiting time in the past 3 years. In particular children and small adults are put at a disadvantage since standard donors have standard size livers. Two options to solve this dilemma are the expanded use of split-liver and living-donor liver transplantation. The specific experiences applying these techniques at the Medizinische Hochschule Hannover are discussed and compared with the results given in the European Liver Transplant Registry. The retrospective analysis demonstrates a shift in the use of resources, with decreasing numbers of full-size cadaver liver transplants and an increase in split- and living-donor liver transplantation. Both techniques are limited to specific patient populations, a notion that has to be considered in the comparison of results and outcome. According to our experience the full-size cadaver liver is still the standard option, while other techniques require careful attention to the chosen recipient population, advanced surgical skills and, for living donors, as a sine qua non the prerequisite of nihil nocere.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

SP - 221

EP - 228

JO - CLIN TRANSPLANT

JF - CLIN TRANSPLANT

SN - 0902-0063

ER -