Evaluation of sham transcranial direct current stimulation for randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials

Standard

Evaluation of sham transcranial direct current stimulation for randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials. / Palm, Ulrich; Reisinger, Eva; Keeser, Daniel; Kuo, Min-Fang; Pogarell, Oliver; Leicht, Gregor; Mulert, Christoph; Nitsche, Michael A; Padberg, Frank.

in: BRAIN STIMUL, Jahrgang 6, Nr. 4, 01.07.2013, S. 690-5.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Palm, U, Reisinger, E, Keeser, D, Kuo, M-F, Pogarell, O, Leicht, G, Mulert, C, Nitsche, MA & Padberg, F 2013, 'Evaluation of sham transcranial direct current stimulation for randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials', BRAIN STIMUL, Jg. 6, Nr. 4, S. 690-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2013.01.005

APA

Palm, U., Reisinger, E., Keeser, D., Kuo, M-F., Pogarell, O., Leicht, G., Mulert, C., Nitsche, M. A., & Padberg, F. (2013). Evaluation of sham transcranial direct current stimulation for randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials. BRAIN STIMUL, 6(4), 690-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2013.01.005

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{a6ecbe092c0a41b6baea669e2ebdc5b0,
title = "Evaluation of sham transcranial direct current stimulation for randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been investigated as therapeutic intervention in various psychiatric and neurologic disorders. As placebo responses to technical interventions may be pronounced in many clinical conditions, it is important to thoroughly develop placebo conditions which meet the requirements for application in randomized double-blind controlled trials.OBJECTIVE: The two-part experiment reported here aims at evaluating a new sham tDCS condition in healthy subjects and device operators. Sham or active tDCS is delivered after entering a number code to the device and allows blinding of the operator before and during tDCS. The sham mode has no short stimulation period.METHODS: The experimental sequence was as follows: 1) Evaluation of successful blinding by comparing placebo to active stimulation at prefrontal sites based on the rating of subjects undergoing tDCS, 2) Evaluation of successful blinding by comparing placebo to active stimulation at prefrontal sites based on the operator/observer ratings.RESULTS: Subjects were not able to distinguish between active and sham tDCS for prefrontal stimulation. Overall there was no relevant discomfort and tDCS was well tolerated. Operators/observers were able to identify sham stimulation based on skin reddening after active, but not after sham tDCS.CONCLUSIONS: The tDCS sham condition investigated here may be suitable for placebo-controlled trials keeping subjects blind to treatment conditions. However, operators can easily be aware of the condition applied and they should not get involved in rating outcome measures during the course of high standard placebo-controlled trials.",
keywords = "Adult, Double-Blind Method, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Placebos, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic",
author = "Ulrich Palm and Eva Reisinger and Daniel Keeser and Min-Fang Kuo and Oliver Pogarell and Gregor Leicht and Christoph Mulert and Nitsche, {Michael A} and Frank Padberg",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2013",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.brs.2013.01.005",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "690--5",
journal = "BRAIN STIMUL",
issn = "1935-861X",
publisher = "ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of sham transcranial direct current stimulation for randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials

AU - Palm, Ulrich

AU - Reisinger, Eva

AU - Keeser, Daniel

AU - Kuo, Min-Fang

AU - Pogarell, Oliver

AU - Leicht, Gregor

AU - Mulert, Christoph

AU - Nitsche, Michael A

AU - Padberg, Frank

N1 - Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2013/7/1

Y1 - 2013/7/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been investigated as therapeutic intervention in various psychiatric and neurologic disorders. As placebo responses to technical interventions may be pronounced in many clinical conditions, it is important to thoroughly develop placebo conditions which meet the requirements for application in randomized double-blind controlled trials.OBJECTIVE: The two-part experiment reported here aims at evaluating a new sham tDCS condition in healthy subjects and device operators. Sham or active tDCS is delivered after entering a number code to the device and allows blinding of the operator before and during tDCS. The sham mode has no short stimulation period.METHODS: The experimental sequence was as follows: 1) Evaluation of successful blinding by comparing placebo to active stimulation at prefrontal sites based on the rating of subjects undergoing tDCS, 2) Evaluation of successful blinding by comparing placebo to active stimulation at prefrontal sites based on the operator/observer ratings.RESULTS: Subjects were not able to distinguish between active and sham tDCS for prefrontal stimulation. Overall there was no relevant discomfort and tDCS was well tolerated. Operators/observers were able to identify sham stimulation based on skin reddening after active, but not after sham tDCS.CONCLUSIONS: The tDCS sham condition investigated here may be suitable for placebo-controlled trials keeping subjects blind to treatment conditions. However, operators can easily be aware of the condition applied and they should not get involved in rating outcome measures during the course of high standard placebo-controlled trials.

AB - BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been investigated as therapeutic intervention in various psychiatric and neurologic disorders. As placebo responses to technical interventions may be pronounced in many clinical conditions, it is important to thoroughly develop placebo conditions which meet the requirements for application in randomized double-blind controlled trials.OBJECTIVE: The two-part experiment reported here aims at evaluating a new sham tDCS condition in healthy subjects and device operators. Sham or active tDCS is delivered after entering a number code to the device and allows blinding of the operator before and during tDCS. The sham mode has no short stimulation period.METHODS: The experimental sequence was as follows: 1) Evaluation of successful blinding by comparing placebo to active stimulation at prefrontal sites based on the rating of subjects undergoing tDCS, 2) Evaluation of successful blinding by comparing placebo to active stimulation at prefrontal sites based on the operator/observer ratings.RESULTS: Subjects were not able to distinguish between active and sham tDCS for prefrontal stimulation. Overall there was no relevant discomfort and tDCS was well tolerated. Operators/observers were able to identify sham stimulation based on skin reddening after active, but not after sham tDCS.CONCLUSIONS: The tDCS sham condition investigated here may be suitable for placebo-controlled trials keeping subjects blind to treatment conditions. However, operators can easily be aware of the condition applied and they should not get involved in rating outcome measures during the course of high standard placebo-controlled trials.

KW - Adult

KW - Double-Blind Method

KW - Electric Stimulation Therapy

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Placebos

KW - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

U2 - 10.1016/j.brs.2013.01.005

DO - 10.1016/j.brs.2013.01.005

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 23415938

VL - 6

SP - 690

EP - 695

JO - BRAIN STIMUL

JF - BRAIN STIMUL

SN - 1935-861X

IS - 4

ER -