Evaluation of pelvic circular compression devices in severely injured trauma patients with pelvic fractures

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of pelvic circular compression devices in severely injured trauma patients with pelvic fractures

AU - Berger-Groch, Josephine

AU - Rueger, Johannes Maria

AU - Czorlich, Patrick

AU - Frosch, Karl-Heinz

AU - Lefering, Rolf

AU - Hoffmann, Michael

AU - Trauma Register DGU

PY - 2022/6/21

Y1 - 2022/6/21

N2 - Background: The role of pelvic circumferential compression devices (PCCD) is to temporarily stabilize the pelvic ring, reduce its volume and to tamponade bleeding. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of PCCDs on mortality and bleeding in severely injured trauma patients, using a large registry database.Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients registered in the Trauma Register DGU® between 2015 and 2016. The study was limited to directly admitted patients who were alive on admission, with an injury severity score (ISS) of 9 or higher, with an Abbreviated Injury Scale AISpelvis of 3-5, aged at least 16, and with complete status documentation on pelvic circular compression devices (PCCD) and mortality. A cohort analysis was undertaken of patients suffering from relevant pelvic fractures. Data were collected on mortality and requirements for blood transfusion. The observed outcome was compared with the expected outcome as derived from version II of the Revised Injury Severity Classification (RISC II) and adjusted accordingly . A Standardized Mortality Ratio (SMR) was also calculated.Results: A total of 9,910 patients were included. 1,103 of 9,910 patients suffered from a relevant pelvic trauma (AISpelvis=3-5). Only 41% (454 cases) of these received a PCCD. PCCD application had no significant effect on mortality and did not decrease the need for blood transfusion in the multivariate regression analysis. However, in this cohort, the application of a PCCD is a general indicator for a critical patient with increased mortality (12.0% no PCCD applied vs. 23.2% PCCD applied prehospital vs. 27.1% PCCD applied in the emergency department). The ISS was higher in patients with PCCD (34.12 ± 16.4 vs. 27.9 ± 13.8; p < 0.001).Conclusion: PCCD was applied more often in patients with severe pelvic trauma according to ISS and AISpelvis as well with deterioration in circulatory status. PCCDs did not reduce mortality or reduce the need for blood transfusion.Trial registration: TR-DGU ID 2017-003, March 2017; German clinical trial register DRKS00024948.

AB - Background: The role of pelvic circumferential compression devices (PCCD) is to temporarily stabilize the pelvic ring, reduce its volume and to tamponade bleeding. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of PCCDs on mortality and bleeding in severely injured trauma patients, using a large registry database.Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients registered in the Trauma Register DGU® between 2015 and 2016. The study was limited to directly admitted patients who were alive on admission, with an injury severity score (ISS) of 9 or higher, with an Abbreviated Injury Scale AISpelvis of 3-5, aged at least 16, and with complete status documentation on pelvic circular compression devices (PCCD) and mortality. A cohort analysis was undertaken of patients suffering from relevant pelvic fractures. Data were collected on mortality and requirements for blood transfusion. The observed outcome was compared with the expected outcome as derived from version II of the Revised Injury Severity Classification (RISC II) and adjusted accordingly . A Standardized Mortality Ratio (SMR) was also calculated.Results: A total of 9,910 patients were included. 1,103 of 9,910 patients suffered from a relevant pelvic trauma (AISpelvis=3-5). Only 41% (454 cases) of these received a PCCD. PCCD application had no significant effect on mortality and did not decrease the need for blood transfusion in the multivariate regression analysis. However, in this cohort, the application of a PCCD is a general indicator for a critical patient with increased mortality (12.0% no PCCD applied vs. 23.2% PCCD applied prehospital vs. 27.1% PCCD applied in the emergency department). The ISS was higher in patients with PCCD (34.12 ± 16.4 vs. 27.9 ± 13.8; p < 0.001).Conclusion: PCCD was applied more often in patients with severe pelvic trauma according to ISS and AISpelvis as well with deterioration in circulatory status. PCCDs did not reduce mortality or reduce the need for blood transfusion.Trial registration: TR-DGU ID 2017-003, March 2017; German clinical trial register DRKS00024948.

KW - Emergency Medical Services

KW - Fractures, Bone/therapy

KW - Hemorrhage/etiology

KW - Humans

KW - Injury Severity Score

KW - Pelvic Bones/injuries

KW - Pelvis/injuries

KW - Registries

KW - Retrospective Studies

U2 - 10.1080/10903127.2021.1945717

DO - 10.1080/10903127.2021.1945717

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 34152927

VL - 26

SP - 547

EP - 555

JO - PREHOSP EMERG CARE

JF - PREHOSP EMERG CARE

SN - 1090-3127

IS - 4

ER -