PortalPublikationenEmpirisch gestützte Empfehlungen für die patientenberichtete...

Empirisch gestützte Empfehlungen für die patientenberichtete Veränderungsmessung in der medizinischen Rehabilitation

Standard

Empirisch gestützte Empfehlungen für die patientenberichtete Veränderungsmessung in der medizinischen Rehabilitation. / Mittag, O; Kohlmann, T; Meyer, T; Meyer-Moock, S; Meffert, C; Farin, E; Gerdes, N; Pohontsch, N; Moock, J; Jelitte, M; Löschmann, C; Bitzer, E-M; Raspe, H.

in: REHABILITATION, Jahrgang 52, Nr. 2, 01.04.2013, S. 119-25.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung

Harvard

Mittag, O, Kohlmann, T, Meyer, T, Meyer-Moock, S, Meffert, C, Farin, E, Gerdes, N, Pohontsch, N, Moock, J, Jelitte, M, Löschmann, C, Bitzer, E-M & Raspe, H 2013, 'Empirisch gestützte Empfehlungen für die patientenberichtete Veränderungsmessung in der medizinischen Rehabilitation', REHABILITATION, Jg. 52, Nr. 2, S. 119-25. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1314876

APA

Mittag, O., Kohlmann, T., Meyer, T., Meyer-Moock, S., Meffert, C., Farin, E., Gerdes, N., Pohontsch, N., Moock, J., Jelitte, M., Löschmann, C., Bitzer, E-M., & Raspe, H. (2013). Empirisch gestützte Empfehlungen für die patientenberichtete Veränderungsmessung in der medizinischen Rehabilitation. REHABILITATION, 52(2), 119-25. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1314876

Vancouver

Mittag O, Kohlmann T, Meyer T, Meyer-Moock S, Meffert C, Farin E et al. Empirisch gestützte Empfehlungen für die patientenberichtete Veränderungsmessung in der medizinischen Rehabilitation. REHABILITATION. 2013 Apr 1;52(2):119-25. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1314876

Bibtex

@article{23297780dcf843779bccad2feaa82c75,
title = "Empirisch gest{\"u}tzte Empfehlungen f{\"u}r die patientenberichtete Ver{\"a}nderungsmessung in der medizinischen Rehabilitation",
abstract = "Diverse methods are available for evaluation of (medical) interventions. In each case one has to decide on a specific method. Our aim was to analyze typical problems involved in the measurement of change. Different methods are delineated, and their specific pros and cons are set out. Subsequently, empirically derived recommendations are outlined on which method should be employed for which problem and under which circumstances. A characteristic of rehab treatment is that as a rule a multitude of problems are addressed, and accordingly, treatment goals are heterogenic. Straightforward recommendations for one or the other method cannot be given.",
keywords = "Algorithms, Diagnostic Self Evaluation, Disabled Persons, Germany, Humans, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Patient Satisfaction, Treatment Outcome",
author = "O Mittag and T Kohlmann and T Meyer and S Meyer-Moock and C Meffert and E Farin and N Gerdes and N Pohontsch and J Moock and M Jelitte and C L{\"o}schmann and E-M Bitzer and H Raspe",
note = "{\textcopyright} Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.",
year = "2013",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1055/s-0032-1314876",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "52",
pages = "119--25",
journal = "REHABILITATION",
issn = "0034-3536",
publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag KG",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Empirisch gestützte Empfehlungen für die patientenberichtete Veränderungsmessung in der medizinischen Rehabilitation

AU - Mittag, O

AU - Kohlmann, T

AU - Meyer, T

AU - Meyer-Moock, S

AU - Meffert, C

AU - Farin, E

AU - Gerdes, N

AU - Pohontsch, N

AU - Moock, J

AU - Jelitte, M

AU - Löschmann, C

AU - Bitzer, E-M

AU - Raspe, H

N1 - © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

PY - 2013/4/1

Y1 - 2013/4/1

N2 - Diverse methods are available for evaluation of (medical) interventions. In each case one has to decide on a specific method. Our aim was to analyze typical problems involved in the measurement of change. Different methods are delineated, and their specific pros and cons are set out. Subsequently, empirically derived recommendations are outlined on which method should be employed for which problem and under which circumstances. A characteristic of rehab treatment is that as a rule a multitude of problems are addressed, and accordingly, treatment goals are heterogenic. Straightforward recommendations for one or the other method cannot be given.

AB - Diverse methods are available for evaluation of (medical) interventions. In each case one has to decide on a specific method. Our aim was to analyze typical problems involved in the measurement of change. Different methods are delineated, and their specific pros and cons are set out. Subsequently, empirically derived recommendations are outlined on which method should be employed for which problem and under which circumstances. A characteristic of rehab treatment is that as a rule a multitude of problems are addressed, and accordingly, treatment goals are heterogenic. Straightforward recommendations for one or the other method cannot be given.

KW - Algorithms

KW - Diagnostic Self Evaluation

KW - Disabled Persons

KW - Germany

KW - Humans

KW - Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

KW - Patient Satisfaction

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.1055/s-0032-1314876

DO - 10.1055/s-0032-1314876

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

C2 - 22763791

VL - 52

SP - 119

EP - 125

JO - REHABILITATION

JF - REHABILITATION

SN - 0034-3536

IS - 2

ER -