Empfehlungen zur extrakorporalen kardiopulmonalen Reanimation (eCPR): Konsensuspapier der DGIIN, DGK, DGTHG, DGfK, DGNI, DGAI, DIVI und GRC

Standard

Empfehlungen zur extrakorporalen kardiopulmonalen Reanimation (eCPR): Konsensuspapier der DGIIN, DGK, DGTHG, DGfK, DGNI, DGAI, DIVI und GRC. / Michels, G; Wengenmayer, T; Hagl, C; Dohmen, C; Böttiger, B W; Bauersachs, J; Markewitz, A; Bauer, A; Gräsner, J-T; Pfister, R; Ghanem, A; Busch, H-J; Kreimeier, U; Beckmann, A; Fischer, M; Kill, C; Janssens, U; Kluge, S; Born, F; Hoffmeister, H M; Preusch, M; Boeken, U; Riessen, R; Thiele, H.

in: MED KLIN-INTENSIVMED, Jahrgang 113, Nr. 6, 09.2018, S. 478-486.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungAndere (Vorworte u.ä.)Forschung

Harvard

Michels, G, Wengenmayer, T, Hagl, C, Dohmen, C, Böttiger, BW, Bauersachs, J, Markewitz, A, Bauer, A, Gräsner, J-T, Pfister, R, Ghanem, A, Busch, H-J, Kreimeier, U, Beckmann, A, Fischer, M, Kill, C, Janssens, U, Kluge, S, Born, F, Hoffmeister, HM, Preusch, M, Boeken, U, Riessen, R & Thiele, H 2018, 'Empfehlungen zur extrakorporalen kardiopulmonalen Reanimation (eCPR): Konsensuspapier der DGIIN, DGK, DGTHG, DGfK, DGNI, DGAI, DIVI und GRC', MED KLIN-INTENSIVMED, Jg. 113, Nr. 6, S. 478-486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-018-0452-8

APA

Michels, G., Wengenmayer, T., Hagl, C., Dohmen, C., Böttiger, B. W., Bauersachs, J., Markewitz, A., Bauer, A., Gräsner, J-T., Pfister, R., Ghanem, A., Busch, H-J., Kreimeier, U., Beckmann, A., Fischer, M., Kill, C., Janssens, U., Kluge, S., Born, F., ... Thiele, H. (2018). Empfehlungen zur extrakorporalen kardiopulmonalen Reanimation (eCPR): Konsensuspapier der DGIIN, DGK, DGTHG, DGfK, DGNI, DGAI, DIVI und GRC. MED KLIN-INTENSIVMED, 113(6), 478-486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-018-0452-8

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{bf82c106a5f240de8ccb1f1ae32653a7,
title = "Empfehlungen zur extrakorporalen kardiopulmonalen Reanimation (eCPR): Konsensuspapier der DGIIN, DGK, DGTHG, DGfK, DGNI, DGAI, DIVI und GRC",
abstract = "Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) may be considered as a rescue attempt for highly selected patients with refractory cardiac arrest and potentially reversible etiology. Currently there are no randomized, controlled studies on eCPR, and valid predictors of benefit and outcome which might guide the indication for eCPR are lacking. Currently selection criteria and procedures differ across hospitals and standardized algorithms are lacking. Based on expert opinion, the present consensus statement provides a proposal for a standardized treatment algorithm for eCPR.",
keywords = "English Abstract, Journal Article",
author = "G Michels and T Wengenmayer and C Hagl and C Dohmen and B{\"o}ttiger, {B W} and J Bauersachs and A Markewitz and A Bauer and J-T Gr{\"a}sner and R Pfister and A Ghanem and H-J Busch and U Kreimeier and A Beckmann and M Fischer and C Kill and U Janssens and S Kluge and F Born and Hoffmeister, {H M} and M Preusch and U Boeken and R Riessen and H Thiele",
note = "Positionspapier",
year = "2018",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1007/s00063-018-0452-8",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "113",
pages = "478--486",
journal = "MED KLIN-INTENSIVMED",
issn = "2193-6218",
publisher = "Springer Medizin",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Empfehlungen zur extrakorporalen kardiopulmonalen Reanimation (eCPR): Konsensuspapier der DGIIN, DGK, DGTHG, DGfK, DGNI, DGAI, DIVI und GRC

AU - Michels, G

AU - Wengenmayer, T

AU - Hagl, C

AU - Dohmen, C

AU - Böttiger, B W

AU - Bauersachs, J

AU - Markewitz, A

AU - Bauer, A

AU - Gräsner, J-T

AU - Pfister, R

AU - Ghanem, A

AU - Busch, H-J

AU - Kreimeier, U

AU - Beckmann, A

AU - Fischer, M

AU - Kill, C

AU - Janssens, U

AU - Kluge, S

AU - Born, F

AU - Hoffmeister, H M

AU - Preusch, M

AU - Boeken, U

AU - Riessen, R

AU - Thiele, H

N1 - Positionspapier

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) may be considered as a rescue attempt for highly selected patients with refractory cardiac arrest and potentially reversible etiology. Currently there are no randomized, controlled studies on eCPR, and valid predictors of benefit and outcome which might guide the indication for eCPR are lacking. Currently selection criteria and procedures differ across hospitals and standardized algorithms are lacking. Based on expert opinion, the present consensus statement provides a proposal for a standardized treatment algorithm for eCPR.

AB - Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) may be considered as a rescue attempt for highly selected patients with refractory cardiac arrest and potentially reversible etiology. Currently there are no randomized, controlled studies on eCPR, and valid predictors of benefit and outcome which might guide the indication for eCPR are lacking. Currently selection criteria and procedures differ across hospitals and standardized algorithms are lacking. Based on expert opinion, the present consensus statement provides a proposal for a standardized treatment algorithm for eCPR.

KW - English Abstract

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1007/s00063-018-0452-8

DO - 10.1007/s00063-018-0452-8

M3 - Andere (Vorworte u.ä.)

C2 - 29967938

VL - 113

SP - 478

EP - 486

JO - MED KLIN-INTENSIVMED

JF - MED KLIN-INTENSIVMED

SN - 2193-6218

IS - 6

ER -