Empfehlungen zur extrakorporalen kardiopulmonalen Reanimation (eCPR): Konsensuspapier der DGIIN, DGK, DGTHG, DGfK, DGNI, DGAI, DIVI und GRC
Standard
Empfehlungen zur extrakorporalen kardiopulmonalen Reanimation (eCPR): Konsensuspapier der DGIIN, DGK, DGTHG, DGfK, DGNI, DGAI, DIVI und GRC. / Michels, G; Wengenmayer, T; Hagl, C; Dohmen, C; Böttiger, B W; Bauersachs, J; Markewitz, A; Bauer, A; Gräsner, J-T; Pfister, R; Ghanem, A; Busch, H-J; Kreimeier, U; Beckmann, A; Fischer, M; Kill, C; Janssens, U; Kluge, S; Born, F; Hoffmeister, H M; Preusch, M; Boeken, U; Riessen, R; Thiele, H.
in: MED KLIN-INTENSIVMED, Jahrgang 113, Nr. 6, 09.2018, S. 478-486.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › Andere (Vorworte u.ä.) › Forschung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Empfehlungen zur extrakorporalen kardiopulmonalen Reanimation (eCPR): Konsensuspapier der DGIIN, DGK, DGTHG, DGfK, DGNI, DGAI, DIVI und GRC
AU - Michels, G
AU - Wengenmayer, T
AU - Hagl, C
AU - Dohmen, C
AU - Böttiger, B W
AU - Bauersachs, J
AU - Markewitz, A
AU - Bauer, A
AU - Gräsner, J-T
AU - Pfister, R
AU - Ghanem, A
AU - Busch, H-J
AU - Kreimeier, U
AU - Beckmann, A
AU - Fischer, M
AU - Kill, C
AU - Janssens, U
AU - Kluge, S
AU - Born, F
AU - Hoffmeister, H M
AU - Preusch, M
AU - Boeken, U
AU - Riessen, R
AU - Thiele, H
N1 - Positionspapier
PY - 2018/9
Y1 - 2018/9
N2 - Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) may be considered as a rescue attempt for highly selected patients with refractory cardiac arrest and potentially reversible etiology. Currently there are no randomized, controlled studies on eCPR, and valid predictors of benefit and outcome which might guide the indication for eCPR are lacking. Currently selection criteria and procedures differ across hospitals and standardized algorithms are lacking. Based on expert opinion, the present consensus statement provides a proposal for a standardized treatment algorithm for eCPR.
AB - Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) may be considered as a rescue attempt for highly selected patients with refractory cardiac arrest and potentially reversible etiology. Currently there are no randomized, controlled studies on eCPR, and valid predictors of benefit and outcome which might guide the indication for eCPR are lacking. Currently selection criteria and procedures differ across hospitals and standardized algorithms are lacking. Based on expert opinion, the present consensus statement provides a proposal for a standardized treatment algorithm for eCPR.
KW - English Abstract
KW - Journal Article
U2 - 10.1007/s00063-018-0452-8
DO - 10.1007/s00063-018-0452-8
M3 - Andere (Vorworte u.ä.)
C2 - 29967938
VL - 113
SP - 478
EP - 486
JO - MED KLIN-INTENSIVMED
JF - MED KLIN-INTENSIVMED
SN - 2193-6218
IS - 6
ER -