Efficacy of Retreatment After Failed Direct-acting Antiviral Therapy in Patients With HCV Genotype 1-3 Infections

  • Julia Dietz
  • Ulrich Spengler
  • Beat Müllhaupt
  • Julian Schulze Zur Wiesch
  • Felix Piecha
  • Stefan Mauss
  • Barbara Seegers
  • Holger Hinrichsen
  • Christoph Antoni
  • Perdita Wietzke-Braun
  • Kai-Henrik Peiffer
  • Annemarie Berger
  • Katrin Matschenz
  • Peter Buggisch
  • Johanna Backhus
  • Eugen Zizer
  • Tobias Boettler
  • Christoph Neumann-Haefelin
  • David Semela
  • Rudolf Stauber
  • Thomas Berg
  • Christoph Berg
  • Stefan Zeuzem
  • Johannes Vermehren (Geteilte/r Letztautor/in)
  • Christoph Sarrazin (Geteilte/r Letztautor/in)
  • European HCV Resistance Study Group

Beteiligte Einrichtungen

Abstract

Hepatitis C virus infection is causing chronic liver disease, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. By combining direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), high sustained virologic response rates (SVRs) can be achieved. Resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) are commonly observed after DAA failure, and especially nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) RASs may impact retreatment options.1-3 Data on retreatment of DAA failure patients using first-generation DAAs are limited.4-7 Recently, a second-generation protease- and NS5A-inhibitor plus sofosbuvir (voxilaprevir/velpatasvir/sofosbuvir [VOX/VEL/SOF]) was approved for retreatment after DAA failure.8 However, this and other second-generation regimens are not available in many resource-limited countries or are not reimbursed by regular insurance, and recommendations regarding the selection of retreatment regimens using first-generation DAAs are very important. This study aimed to analyze patients who were re-treated with first-generation DAAs after failure of a DAA combination therapy.

Bibliografische Daten

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ISSN1542-3565
DOIs
StatusVeröffentlicht - 01.2021

Anmerkungen des Dekanats

Copyright © 2019 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PubMed 31706062