Efficacy and Safety of Ixekizumab Versus Adalimumab in Biologic-naïve Patients With Active Psoriatic Arthritis and Moderate-to-severe Psoriasis: 52-week Results From the Randomized SPIRIT-H2H Trial

Standard

Efficacy and Safety of Ixekizumab Versus Adalimumab in Biologic-naïve Patients With Active Psoriatic Arthritis and Moderate-to-severe Psoriasis: 52-week Results From the Randomized SPIRIT-H2H Trial. / Reich, Kristian; Kristensen, Lars Erik; Smith, Saxon D; Rich, Phoebe; Sapin, Christophe; Leage, Soyi Liu; McKenzie, Robert; Schuster, Christopher; Riedl, Elisabeth; Gooderham, Melinda.

in: DERMATOL PRACT CONCE, Jahrgang 12, Nr. 2, e2022104, 05.2022.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{aed41fca49d04c2098e71cf12250b954,
title = "Efficacy and Safety of Ixekizumab Versus Adalimumab in Biologic-na{\"i}ve Patients With Active Psoriatic Arthritis and Moderate-to-severe Psoriasis: 52-week Results From the Randomized SPIRIT-H2H Trial",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: The randomized, open-label, assessor-blinded, parallel-group SPIRIT-H2H trial (NCT03151551) demonstrated superiority of ixekizumab over adalimumab in simultaneously achieving improvement in joint symptoms (American College of Rheumatology [ACR]50) and skin clearance (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI]100) in biologic-na{\"i}ve patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and plaque psoriasis (PsO) at Week (W) 24. Higher efficacy of ixekizumab versus adalimumab was maintained through W52.OBJECTIVES: This analysis investigated efficacy and safety of ixekizumab and adalimumab in the subgroup of patients with PsA and moderate-to-severe PsO through W52.METHODS: Efficacy and safety outcomes were analyzed in patients with PsA and moderate-to-severe PsO (PASI ≥ 12, Body Surface Area ≥ 10%, static Physician Global Assessment ≥ 3) through W52. Categorical and continuous outcomes were analyzed using logistic regression models and mixed model for repeated measures, respectively.RESULTS: More ixekizumab-versus adalimumab-treated patients simultaneously achieved PASI100 and ACR50 at W24 (40.8% versus 17.6%, P = 0.015) and W52 (38.8% versus 17.6%, P = 0.026). Likewise, more ixekizumab-versus adalimumab-treated patients achieved PASI100 (59.2% versus 25.5%, P = 0.001) and PASI90 (81.6% versus 60.8%, P = 0.028) through W52, and nail PsO clearance at W24. Joint symptom improvements were comparable between groups. No new safety findings were reported.CONCLUSIONS: Ixekizumab had higher efficacy than adalimumab in simultaneous achievement of ACR50 and PASI100 at W24 and W52 in patients with PsA and moderate-to-severe PsO. Ixekizumab-treated patients showed higher response rates for nail PsO clearance and for reporting minimal or no impact on quality of life at W24.",
author = "Kristian Reich and Kristensen, {Lars Erik} and Smith, {Saxon D} and Phoebe Rich and Christophe Sapin and Leage, {Soyi Liu} and Robert McKenzie and Christopher Schuster and Elisabeth Riedl and Melinda Gooderham",
note = "{\textcopyright}2022 Reich et al.",
year = "2022",
month = may,
doi = "10.5826/dpc.1202a104",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "DERMATOL PRACT CONCE",
issn = "2160-9381",
publisher = "Mattioli1885",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficacy and Safety of Ixekizumab Versus Adalimumab in Biologic-naïve Patients With Active Psoriatic Arthritis and Moderate-to-severe Psoriasis: 52-week Results From the Randomized SPIRIT-H2H Trial

AU - Reich, Kristian

AU - Kristensen, Lars Erik

AU - Smith, Saxon D

AU - Rich, Phoebe

AU - Sapin, Christophe

AU - Leage, Soyi Liu

AU - McKenzie, Robert

AU - Schuster, Christopher

AU - Riedl, Elisabeth

AU - Gooderham, Melinda

N1 - ©2022 Reich et al.

PY - 2022/5

Y1 - 2022/5

N2 - INTRODUCTION: The randomized, open-label, assessor-blinded, parallel-group SPIRIT-H2H trial (NCT03151551) demonstrated superiority of ixekizumab over adalimumab in simultaneously achieving improvement in joint symptoms (American College of Rheumatology [ACR]50) and skin clearance (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI]100) in biologic-naïve patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and plaque psoriasis (PsO) at Week (W) 24. Higher efficacy of ixekizumab versus adalimumab was maintained through W52.OBJECTIVES: This analysis investigated efficacy and safety of ixekizumab and adalimumab in the subgroup of patients with PsA and moderate-to-severe PsO through W52.METHODS: Efficacy and safety outcomes were analyzed in patients with PsA and moderate-to-severe PsO (PASI ≥ 12, Body Surface Area ≥ 10%, static Physician Global Assessment ≥ 3) through W52. Categorical and continuous outcomes were analyzed using logistic regression models and mixed model for repeated measures, respectively.RESULTS: More ixekizumab-versus adalimumab-treated patients simultaneously achieved PASI100 and ACR50 at W24 (40.8% versus 17.6%, P = 0.015) and W52 (38.8% versus 17.6%, P = 0.026). Likewise, more ixekizumab-versus adalimumab-treated patients achieved PASI100 (59.2% versus 25.5%, P = 0.001) and PASI90 (81.6% versus 60.8%, P = 0.028) through W52, and nail PsO clearance at W24. Joint symptom improvements were comparable between groups. No new safety findings were reported.CONCLUSIONS: Ixekizumab had higher efficacy than adalimumab in simultaneous achievement of ACR50 and PASI100 at W24 and W52 in patients with PsA and moderate-to-severe PsO. Ixekizumab-treated patients showed higher response rates for nail PsO clearance and for reporting minimal or no impact on quality of life at W24.

AB - INTRODUCTION: The randomized, open-label, assessor-blinded, parallel-group SPIRIT-H2H trial (NCT03151551) demonstrated superiority of ixekizumab over adalimumab in simultaneously achieving improvement in joint symptoms (American College of Rheumatology [ACR]50) and skin clearance (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI]100) in biologic-naïve patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and plaque psoriasis (PsO) at Week (W) 24. Higher efficacy of ixekizumab versus adalimumab was maintained through W52.OBJECTIVES: This analysis investigated efficacy and safety of ixekizumab and adalimumab in the subgroup of patients with PsA and moderate-to-severe PsO through W52.METHODS: Efficacy and safety outcomes were analyzed in patients with PsA and moderate-to-severe PsO (PASI ≥ 12, Body Surface Area ≥ 10%, static Physician Global Assessment ≥ 3) through W52. Categorical and continuous outcomes were analyzed using logistic regression models and mixed model for repeated measures, respectively.RESULTS: More ixekizumab-versus adalimumab-treated patients simultaneously achieved PASI100 and ACR50 at W24 (40.8% versus 17.6%, P = 0.015) and W52 (38.8% versus 17.6%, P = 0.026). Likewise, more ixekizumab-versus adalimumab-treated patients achieved PASI100 (59.2% versus 25.5%, P = 0.001) and PASI90 (81.6% versus 60.8%, P = 0.028) through W52, and nail PsO clearance at W24. Joint symptom improvements were comparable between groups. No new safety findings were reported.CONCLUSIONS: Ixekizumab had higher efficacy than adalimumab in simultaneous achievement of ACR50 and PASI100 at W24 and W52 in patients with PsA and moderate-to-severe PsO. Ixekizumab-treated patients showed higher response rates for nail PsO clearance and for reporting minimal or no impact on quality of life at W24.

U2 - 10.5826/dpc.1202a104

DO - 10.5826/dpc.1202a104

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 35646453

VL - 12

JO - DERMATOL PRACT CONCE

JF - DERMATOL PRACT CONCE

SN - 2160-9381

IS - 2

M1 - e2022104

ER -