Effects of intolerance of uncertainty on subjective and psychophysiological measures during fear acquisition and delayed extinction

Standard

Effects of intolerance of uncertainty on subjective and psychophysiological measures during fear acquisition and delayed extinction. / Klingelhöfer-Jens, Maren; Morriss, Jayne; Lonsdorf, Tina B.

in: INT J PSYCHOPHYSIOL, Jahrgang 177, 07.2022, S. 249-259.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{ceb975f7843b421ba25f27a8d9475da4,
title = "Effects of intolerance of uncertainty on subjective and psychophysiological measures during fear acquisition and delayed extinction",
abstract = "Individuals who score high in self-reported Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU) tend to find uncertainty unacceptable and aversive. In recent years, research has shed light on the role of IU in modulating subjective (i.e. expectancy ratings) and psychophysiological responses (i.e. skin conductance) across different classical fear conditioning procedures. In particular, during immediate extinction higher IU is associated with disrupted safety learning. However, there remain gaps in understanding how IU, in comparison to other negative emotionality traits (STAI-T), impact different types of subjective and psychophysiological measures during different classical fear conditioning procedures. In our exploratory study, we analyzed IU, STAI-T, subjective (i.e. fear ratings) and psychophysiological (i.e. skin conductance, auditory startle blink) data recorded during fear acquisition training and 24 h-delayed extinction training (n = 66). Higher IU, controlled for STAI-T, was: (1) significantly associated with greater fear ratings to the learned fear cue during fear acquisition training, and (2) at trend associated with greater fear ratings to the learned fear versus safe cue during delayed extinction training. Null results were observed for both IU and STAI-T in relation to skin conductance and auditory startle blink during fear acquisition training and delayed extinction training. These results add to and extend our current understanding of the role of IU on subjective and physiological measures during different fear conditioning procedures particularly that of subjective fear ratings during acquisition and delayed extinction training. Implications of these findings and future directions are discussed.",
keywords = "Conditioning, Classical/physiology, Extinction, Psychological/physiology, Fear/physiology, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Reflex, Startle/physiology, Uncertainty",
author = "Maren Klingelh{\"o}fer-Jens and Jayne Morriss and Lonsdorf, {Tina B}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
year = "2022",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2022.05.006",
language = "English",
volume = "177",
pages = "249--259",
journal = "INT J PSYCHOPHYSIOL",
issn = "0167-8760",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of intolerance of uncertainty on subjective and psychophysiological measures during fear acquisition and delayed extinction

AU - Klingelhöfer-Jens, Maren

AU - Morriss, Jayne

AU - Lonsdorf, Tina B

N1 - Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PY - 2022/7

Y1 - 2022/7

N2 - Individuals who score high in self-reported Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU) tend to find uncertainty unacceptable and aversive. In recent years, research has shed light on the role of IU in modulating subjective (i.e. expectancy ratings) and psychophysiological responses (i.e. skin conductance) across different classical fear conditioning procedures. In particular, during immediate extinction higher IU is associated with disrupted safety learning. However, there remain gaps in understanding how IU, in comparison to other negative emotionality traits (STAI-T), impact different types of subjective and psychophysiological measures during different classical fear conditioning procedures. In our exploratory study, we analyzed IU, STAI-T, subjective (i.e. fear ratings) and psychophysiological (i.e. skin conductance, auditory startle blink) data recorded during fear acquisition training and 24 h-delayed extinction training (n = 66). Higher IU, controlled for STAI-T, was: (1) significantly associated with greater fear ratings to the learned fear cue during fear acquisition training, and (2) at trend associated with greater fear ratings to the learned fear versus safe cue during delayed extinction training. Null results were observed for both IU and STAI-T in relation to skin conductance and auditory startle blink during fear acquisition training and delayed extinction training. These results add to and extend our current understanding of the role of IU on subjective and physiological measures during different fear conditioning procedures particularly that of subjective fear ratings during acquisition and delayed extinction training. Implications of these findings and future directions are discussed.

AB - Individuals who score high in self-reported Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU) tend to find uncertainty unacceptable and aversive. In recent years, research has shed light on the role of IU in modulating subjective (i.e. expectancy ratings) and psychophysiological responses (i.e. skin conductance) across different classical fear conditioning procedures. In particular, during immediate extinction higher IU is associated with disrupted safety learning. However, there remain gaps in understanding how IU, in comparison to other negative emotionality traits (STAI-T), impact different types of subjective and psychophysiological measures during different classical fear conditioning procedures. In our exploratory study, we analyzed IU, STAI-T, subjective (i.e. fear ratings) and psychophysiological (i.e. skin conductance, auditory startle blink) data recorded during fear acquisition training and 24 h-delayed extinction training (n = 66). Higher IU, controlled for STAI-T, was: (1) significantly associated with greater fear ratings to the learned fear cue during fear acquisition training, and (2) at trend associated with greater fear ratings to the learned fear versus safe cue during delayed extinction training. Null results were observed for both IU and STAI-T in relation to skin conductance and auditory startle blink during fear acquisition training and delayed extinction training. These results add to and extend our current understanding of the role of IU on subjective and physiological measures during different fear conditioning procedures particularly that of subjective fear ratings during acquisition and delayed extinction training. Implications of these findings and future directions are discussed.

KW - Conditioning, Classical/physiology

KW - Extinction, Psychological/physiology

KW - Fear/physiology

KW - Galvanic Skin Response

KW - Humans

KW - Reflex, Startle/physiology

KW - Uncertainty

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2022.05.006

DO - 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2022.05.006

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 35569602

VL - 177

SP - 249

EP - 259

JO - INT J PSYCHOPHYSIOL

JF - INT J PSYCHOPHYSIOL

SN - 0167-8760

ER -