Effects of a structured counselling-based intervention to improve physical activity behaviour of adolescents and young adult cancer survivors - the randomized phase II Motivate AYA - MAYA trial
Standard
Effects of a structured counselling-based intervention to improve physical activity behaviour of adolescents and young adult cancer survivors - the randomized phase II Motivate AYA - MAYA trial. / Salchow, Jannike; Koch, Barbara; Mann, Julia; von Grundherr, Julia; Elmers, Simon; Dwinger, Sarah; Escherich, Gabriele; Vettorazzi, Eik; Reer, Rüdiger; Sinn, Marianne; Baumann, Freerk; Bokemeyer, Carsten; Stein, Alexander; Jensen, Wiebke.
in: CLIN REHABIL, Jahrgang 35, Nr. 8, 08.2021, S. 1164-1174.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of a structured counselling-based intervention to improve physical activity behaviour of adolescents and young adult cancer survivors - the randomized phase II Motivate AYA - MAYA trial
AU - Salchow, Jannike
AU - Koch, Barbara
AU - Mann, Julia
AU - von Grundherr, Julia
AU - Elmers, Simon
AU - Dwinger, Sarah
AU - Escherich, Gabriele
AU - Vettorazzi, Eik
AU - Reer, Rüdiger
AU - Sinn, Marianne
AU - Baumann, Freerk
AU - Bokemeyer, Carsten
AU - Stein, Alexander
AU - Jensen, Wiebke
PY - 2021/8
Y1 - 2021/8
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To explore whether a structured counselling-based intervention increases vigorous physical activity behaviour of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors.DESIGN: Randomized controlled phase II trial.SETTING: University Cancer Center Hamburg, Germany.SUBJECTS: Eighty-nine participants (mean age 24.1 ± 6.3) were randomized to control (n = 44) or intervention group (n = 45).INTERVENTIONS: The intervention group was consulted about physical activity behaviour via interview (week 0), and telephone counselling (weeks 1, 3 and 12). The control group only received general physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors (week 0).MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was the rate of participants with ⩾9 metabolic equivalent (MET)-hours per week of vigorous activity post-intervention, measured with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included assessing physical activity behaviour (e.g. amount and type of physical activity) and quality of life. Assessments were completed in weeks 0 (baseline), 12 (post-intervention) and 52 (follow-up).RESULTS: Sixty-nine participants completed the post-intervention- and 47 the follow-up-assessment. The rate of participants performing vigorous physical activity increased from baseline to post-intervention for both without differing significantly (P = 0.541). Both increased their total metabolic equivalent from baseline to post-intervention (intervention group from 55.2 ± 43.7 to 61.7 ± 29.4, control group from 75.3 ± 81.4 to 88.3 ± 80.2). At follow-up the intervention group (73.7 ± 80.2) was more active than baseline when compared to the control group (78.5 ± 50.0).CONCLUSIONS: A structured counselling-based physical activity intervention did not significantly impact the level of vigorous physical activity behaviour in adolescent and young adult cancer survivors.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To explore whether a structured counselling-based intervention increases vigorous physical activity behaviour of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors.DESIGN: Randomized controlled phase II trial.SETTING: University Cancer Center Hamburg, Germany.SUBJECTS: Eighty-nine participants (mean age 24.1 ± 6.3) were randomized to control (n = 44) or intervention group (n = 45).INTERVENTIONS: The intervention group was consulted about physical activity behaviour via interview (week 0), and telephone counselling (weeks 1, 3 and 12). The control group only received general physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors (week 0).MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was the rate of participants with ⩾9 metabolic equivalent (MET)-hours per week of vigorous activity post-intervention, measured with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included assessing physical activity behaviour (e.g. amount and type of physical activity) and quality of life. Assessments were completed in weeks 0 (baseline), 12 (post-intervention) and 52 (follow-up).RESULTS: Sixty-nine participants completed the post-intervention- and 47 the follow-up-assessment. The rate of participants performing vigorous physical activity increased from baseline to post-intervention for both without differing significantly (P = 0.541). Both increased their total metabolic equivalent from baseline to post-intervention (intervention group from 55.2 ± 43.7 to 61.7 ± 29.4, control group from 75.3 ± 81.4 to 88.3 ± 80.2). At follow-up the intervention group (73.7 ± 80.2) was more active than baseline when compared to the control group (78.5 ± 50.0).CONCLUSIONS: A structured counselling-based physical activity intervention did not significantly impact the level of vigorous physical activity behaviour in adolescent and young adult cancer survivors.
U2 - 10.1177/0269215521997974
DO - 10.1177/0269215521997974
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 33685232
VL - 35
SP - 1164
EP - 1174
JO - CLIN REHABIL
JF - CLIN REHABIL
SN - 0269-2155
IS - 8
ER -
