Effectiveness of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Radical Cystectomy for Locally Advanced and/or Pelvic Lymph Node-Positive Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder

  • Malte W Vetterlein
  • Thomas Seisen
  • Matthias May
  • Philipp Nuhn
  • Michael Gierth
  • Roman Mayr
  • Hans-Martin Fritsche
  • Maximilian Burger
  • Vladimir Novotny
  • Michael Froehner
  • Manfred P Wirth
  • Chris Protzel
  • Oliver W Hakenberg
  • Florian Roghmann
  • Rein-Jüri Palisaar
  • Joachim Noldus
  • Armin Pycha
  • Patrick J Bastian
  • Quoc-Dien Trinh
  • Evanguelos Xylinas
  • Shahrokh F Shariat
  • Michael Rink
  • Felix K-H Chun
  • Roland Dahlem
  • Margit Fisch
  • Atiqullah Aziz
  • PROMETRICS 2011 study group

Beteiligte Einrichtungen

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) after radical cystectomy (RC) is controversial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of AC after RC for muscle-invasive UCB in contemporary European routine practice.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: By using a prospectively collected European multicenter database, we compared survival outcomes between patients who received AC versus observation after RC for locally advanced (pT3/T4) and/or pelvic lymph node-positive (pN+) muscle-invasive UCB in 2011.

INTERVENTION: AC versus observation after RC.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Cox regression and competing risks analyses were performed to compare overall survival (OS) as well as cancer-specific and other-cause mortality between patients who received AC versus observation.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 224 patients who received AC (n = 84) versus observation (n = 140) were included. The rate of 3-yr OS in patients who received AC versus observation was 62.1% versus 40.9%, respectively (p = 0.014). In IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analysis, AC versus observation was associated with an OS benefit (hazard ratio: 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25-0.86; p = 0.014). In IPTW-adjusted competing risks analysis, AC versus observation was associated with a decreased risk of cancer-specific mortality (subhazard ratio: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.26-0.98; p = 0.044) without any increased risk of other-cause mortality (subhazard ratio: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.14-1.60; p = 0.233). Limitations include the relatively small sample size as well as the potential presence of unmeasured confounders related to the observational study design.

CONCLUSIONS: We found that AC versus observation was associated with a survival benefit after RC in patients with pT3/T4 and/or pN+ UCB. These results should encourage physicians to deliver AC and researchers to pursue prospective or large observational investigations.

PATIENT SUMMARY: Overall survival and cancer-specific survival benefit was found in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy relative to observation after radical cystectomy for locally advanced and/or pelvic lymph node-positive bladder cancer.

Bibliografische Daten

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ISSN2405-4569
DOIs
StatusVeröffentlicht - 18.07.2016
PubMed 28753775