Effect of the addition of a mental health specialist for evaluation of undiagnosed patients in centres for rare diseases (ZSE-DUO)

  • Helge Hebestreit
  • Anne-Marie Lapstich
  • Lilly Brandstetter
  • Christian Krauth
  • Jürgen Deckert
  • Kirsten Haas
  • Lisa Pfister
  • Stefanie Witt
  • Christopher Schippers
  • Jan Dieris-Hirche
  • Tim Maisch
  • Oliver Tüscher
  • Lavinia Bârlescu
  • Alexandra Berger
  • Mark Berneburg
  • Vanessa Britz
  • Anna Deibele
  • Holm Graeßner
  • Harald Gündel
  • Gereon Heuft
  • Thomas Lücke
  • Christine Mundlos
  • Julia Quitmann
  • Frank Rutsch
  • Katharina Schubert
  • Jörg Bernhard Schulz
  • Susann Schweiger
  • Cornelia Zeidler
  • Lena Zeltner
  • Martina de Zwaan
  • ZSE-DUO working group

Abstract

BACKGROUND: People with complex symptomatology but unclear diagnosis presenting to a centre for rare diseases (CRD) may present with mental (co-)morbidity. We hypothesised that combining an expert in somatic medicine with a mental health specialist working in tandem will improve the diagnostic outcome.

METHODS: Patients aged 12 years and older who presented to one of the 11 participating German CRDs with an unknown diagnosis were recruited into this prospective cohort trial with a two-phase cohort design. From October 1, 2018 to September 30, 2019, participants were allocated to standard care (SC, N = 684), and from October 1, 2019 to January 31, 2021 to innovative care (IC, N = 695). The cohorts consisted mainly of adult participants with only a minority of children included (N = 67). IC included the involvement of a mental health specialist in all aspects of care (e.g., assessing medical records, clinic visits, telehealth care, and case conferences). Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03563677.

FINDINGS: The proportion of patients with diagnoses established within 12 months after the first visit to the CRD explaining the entire symptomatology (primary outcome) was 19% (N = 131 of 672) in the SC and 42% (N = 286 of 686) in the IC cohort (OR adjusted for centre effects 3.45 [95% CrI: 1.99-5.65]). The difference was mainly due to a higher prevalence of mental disorders and non-rare somatic diseases in the IC cohort. The median time to explaining diagnoses was one month shorter with IC (95% CrI: 1-2), and significantly more patients could be referred to local regular care in the IC (27.5%; N = 181 of 659) compared to the SC (12.3%; N = 81 of 658) cohort (OR adjusted for centre effects 2.70 [95% CrI: 2.02-3.60]). At 12-month follow-up, patient satisfaction with care was significantly higher in the IC compared to the SC cohort, while quality of life was not different between cohorts.

INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggested that including a mental health specialist in the entire evaluation process of CRDs for undiagnosed adolescents and adults should become an integral part of the assessment of individuals with a suspected rare disease.

FUNDING: The study was funded by the Global Innovation Fund from the Joint Federal Committee in Germany (Innovationsfonds des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses), grant number 01NVF17031.

Bibliografische Daten

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer102260
ISSN2589-5370
DOIs
StatusVeröffentlicht - 11.2023

Anmerkungen des Dekanats

© 2023 The Author(s).

PubMed 37855024