PortalPublikationenEffect of posterior offset humeral components on range of mo...

Effect of posterior offset humeral components on range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Standard

Effect of posterior offset humeral components on range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. / Dedy, Nicolas J; Stangenberg, Martin; Liem, Dennis; Hurschler, Christof; Simmen, Beat; Riner, Marc; Marquardt, Bjoern; Steinbeck, Joern.

in: INT ORTHOP, Jahrgang 35, Nr. 4, 04.2011, S. 549-54.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung

Harvard

Dedy, NJ, Stangenberg, M, Liem, D, Hurschler, C, Simmen, B, Riner, M, Marquardt, B & Steinbeck, J 2011, 'Effect of posterior offset humeral components on range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty', INT ORTHOP, Jg. 35, Nr. 4, S. 549-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1079-4

APA

Dedy, N. J., Stangenberg, M., Liem, D., Hurschler, C., Simmen, B., Riner, M., Marquardt, B., & Steinbeck, J. (2011). Effect of posterior offset humeral components on range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. INT ORTHOP, 35(4), 549-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1079-4

Vancouver

Dedy NJ, Stangenberg M, Liem D, Hurschler C, Simmen B, Riner M et al. Effect of posterior offset humeral components on range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. INT ORTHOP. 2011 Apr;35(4):549-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1079-4

Bibtex

@article{3424f8b6fa7f485c95fa0e3a714e96e6,
title = "Effect of posterior offset humeral components on range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of eccentric humeral components with different degrees of posterior offset on range of glenohumeral motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Uncemented PROMOS{\textregistered} reverse shoulder prostheses were implanted in eight human cadaveric shoulder specimens. Passive range of motion was evaluated with a robot-assisted shoulder simulator. Three movements were tested: abduction, anterior elevation and external rotation. Each specimen was tested with a customary reverse humeral component and two eccentric components with 3 and 6 mm of posterior offset respectively. Mean abduction was 81° (standard deviation [SD] 12) for the customary reverse components, 81° (SD 13) for the 3 mm eccentric and 82° (SD 15) for 6-mm eccentric implants. Mean anterior elevation was 68° (SD 13) in the regular group and 66° (SD 14) and 63° (SD 14) for 3- and 6-mm eccentric groups. With all configurations, 90° of external rotation were achieved without requiring more than 2 N·m of applied rotational moment. Although there was no statistically significant difference between the conventional and the eccentric implants, anterior elevation was decreased by almost 20° in three of eight shoulders with the posterior offset configurations. This was due to a conflict between the proximal humerus and the anterior aspect of the acromion or the coracoid. Although eccentric humeral components can be useful in reverse shoulder arthroplasty to avoid anterior cortical defects in individuals with pronounced humeral head posterior offset, a potential conflict between proximal humerus and scapula may have an unfavourable effect on range of anterior elevation. However, this observation is only true for the uncemented PROMOS{\textregistered} reverse prosthesis. Other reverse shoulder designs with posterior offset components are yet to be tested.",
keywords = "Arthroplasty, Replacement/methods, Cadaver, Cementation, Humans, Humerus/physiopathology, Joint Prosthesis, Prosthesis Design, Range of Motion, Articular/physiology, Shoulder Joint/physiopathology",
author = "Dedy, {Nicolas J} and Martin Stangenberg and Dennis Liem and Christof Hurschler and Beat Simmen and Marc Riner and Bjoern Marquardt and Joern Steinbeck",
year = "2011",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1007/s00264-010-1079-4",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "549--54",
journal = "INT ORTHOP",
issn = "0341-2695",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of posterior offset humeral components on range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

AU - Dedy, Nicolas J

AU - Stangenberg, Martin

AU - Liem, Dennis

AU - Hurschler, Christof

AU - Simmen, Beat

AU - Riner, Marc

AU - Marquardt, Bjoern

AU - Steinbeck, Joern

PY - 2011/4

Y1 - 2011/4

N2 - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of eccentric humeral components with different degrees of posterior offset on range of glenohumeral motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Uncemented PROMOS® reverse shoulder prostheses were implanted in eight human cadaveric shoulder specimens. Passive range of motion was evaluated with a robot-assisted shoulder simulator. Three movements were tested: abduction, anterior elevation and external rotation. Each specimen was tested with a customary reverse humeral component and two eccentric components with 3 and 6 mm of posterior offset respectively. Mean abduction was 81° (standard deviation [SD] 12) for the customary reverse components, 81° (SD 13) for the 3 mm eccentric and 82° (SD 15) for 6-mm eccentric implants. Mean anterior elevation was 68° (SD 13) in the regular group and 66° (SD 14) and 63° (SD 14) for 3- and 6-mm eccentric groups. With all configurations, 90° of external rotation were achieved without requiring more than 2 N·m of applied rotational moment. Although there was no statistically significant difference between the conventional and the eccentric implants, anterior elevation was decreased by almost 20° in three of eight shoulders with the posterior offset configurations. This was due to a conflict between the proximal humerus and the anterior aspect of the acromion or the coracoid. Although eccentric humeral components can be useful in reverse shoulder arthroplasty to avoid anterior cortical defects in individuals with pronounced humeral head posterior offset, a potential conflict between proximal humerus and scapula may have an unfavourable effect on range of anterior elevation. However, this observation is only true for the uncemented PROMOS® reverse prosthesis. Other reverse shoulder designs with posterior offset components are yet to be tested.

AB - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of eccentric humeral components with different degrees of posterior offset on range of glenohumeral motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Uncemented PROMOS® reverse shoulder prostheses were implanted in eight human cadaveric shoulder specimens. Passive range of motion was evaluated with a robot-assisted shoulder simulator. Three movements were tested: abduction, anterior elevation and external rotation. Each specimen was tested with a customary reverse humeral component and two eccentric components with 3 and 6 mm of posterior offset respectively. Mean abduction was 81° (standard deviation [SD] 12) for the customary reverse components, 81° (SD 13) for the 3 mm eccentric and 82° (SD 15) for 6-mm eccentric implants. Mean anterior elevation was 68° (SD 13) in the regular group and 66° (SD 14) and 63° (SD 14) for 3- and 6-mm eccentric groups. With all configurations, 90° of external rotation were achieved without requiring more than 2 N·m of applied rotational moment. Although there was no statistically significant difference between the conventional and the eccentric implants, anterior elevation was decreased by almost 20° in three of eight shoulders with the posterior offset configurations. This was due to a conflict between the proximal humerus and the anterior aspect of the acromion or the coracoid. Although eccentric humeral components can be useful in reverse shoulder arthroplasty to avoid anterior cortical defects in individuals with pronounced humeral head posterior offset, a potential conflict between proximal humerus and scapula may have an unfavourable effect on range of anterior elevation. However, this observation is only true for the uncemented PROMOS® reverse prosthesis. Other reverse shoulder designs with posterior offset components are yet to be tested.

KW - Arthroplasty, Replacement/methods

KW - Cadaver

KW - Cementation

KW - Humans

KW - Humerus/physiopathology

KW - Joint Prosthesis

KW - Prosthesis Design

KW - Range of Motion, Articular/physiology

KW - Shoulder Joint/physiopathology

U2 - 10.1007/s00264-010-1079-4

DO - 10.1007/s00264-010-1079-4

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 20563805

VL - 35

SP - 549

EP - 554

JO - INT ORTHOP

JF - INT ORTHOP

SN - 0341-2695

IS - 4

ER -