Effect of Coagulation Factor Concentrates on Markers of Endothelial Cell Damage in Experimental Hemorrhagic Shock

Standard

Effect of Coagulation Factor Concentrates on Markers of Endothelial Cell Damage in Experimental Hemorrhagic Shock. / Hofmann, Nikolaus; Zipperle, Johannes; Brettner, Florian; Jafarmadar, Mohammad; Ashmwe, Mostafa; Keibl, Claudia; Ponschab, Martin; Kipmann, Ulrike; Bahrami, Arian; Redl, Heinz; Bahrami, Soheyl; Fuhrmann, Valentin; Schöchl, Herbert.

in: SHOCK, Jahrgang 52, Nr. 5, 11.2019, S. 497-505.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Hofmann, N, Zipperle, J, Brettner, F, Jafarmadar, M, Ashmwe, M, Keibl, C, Ponschab, M, Kipmann, U, Bahrami, A, Redl, H, Bahrami, S, Fuhrmann, V & Schöchl, H 2019, 'Effect of Coagulation Factor Concentrates on Markers of Endothelial Cell Damage in Experimental Hemorrhagic Shock', SHOCK, Jg. 52, Nr. 5, S. 497-505. https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000001286

APA

Hofmann, N., Zipperle, J., Brettner, F., Jafarmadar, M., Ashmwe, M., Keibl, C., Ponschab, M., Kipmann, U., Bahrami, A., Redl, H., Bahrami, S., Fuhrmann, V., & Schöchl, H. (2019). Effect of Coagulation Factor Concentrates on Markers of Endothelial Cell Damage in Experimental Hemorrhagic Shock. SHOCK, 52(5), 497-505. https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000001286

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{c8e6a954b8ad4a4fb0f9bf1dd16065d3,
title = "Effect of Coagulation Factor Concentrates on Markers of Endothelial Cell Damage in Experimental Hemorrhagic Shock",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Plasma-based resuscitation showed protective effects on the endothelial glycocalyx compared with crystalloid resuscitation. There is paucity of data regarding the effect of coagulation factor concentrates (CFC) on the glycocalyx in hemorrhagic shock (HS). We hypothesized that colloid-based resuscitation supplemented with CFCs offers a therapeutic value to treat endothelial damage following HS.METHODS: Eighty-four rats were subjected to pressure-controlled (mean arterial pressure (MAP) 30-35 mm Hg) and lab-guided (targeted cutoff: lactate >2.2. mmol/L and base deficit > 5.5 mmol/L) HS. Animals were resuscitated with fresh frozen plasma (FFP), human albumin (HA) or Ringer's lactate (RL) and RL or HA supplemented with fibrinogen concentrate (FC) or prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC). Serum epinephrine and the following markers of endothelial damage were assessed at baseline and at the end-of-observation (120 min after shock was terminated): syndecan-1, heparan sulfate, and soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (sVEGFR 1).RESULTS: Resuscitation with FFP had no effect on sVEGFR1 compared with crystalloid-based resuscitation (FFP: 19.3 ng/mL vs. RL: 15.9 ng/mL; RL+FC: 19.7 ng/mL; RL+PCC: 18.9 ng/mL; n.s.). At the end-of-observation, syndecan-1 was similar among all groups. Interestingly, HA+FC treated animals displayed the highest syndecan-1 concentration (12.07 ng/mL). Resuscitation with FFP restored heparan sulfate back to baseline (baseline: 36 ng/mL vs. end-of-observation: 36 ng/mL).CONCLUSION: The current study revealed that plasma-based resuscitation normalized circulating heparan sulfate but not syndecan-1. Co-administration of CFC had no further effect on glycocalyx shedding suggesting a lack of its therapeutic potential.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: VExperimental in vivo study.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Nikolaus Hofmann and Johannes Zipperle and Florian Brettner and Mohammad Jafarmadar and Mostafa Ashmwe and Claudia Keibl and Martin Ponschab and Ulrike Kipmann and Arian Bahrami and Heinz Redl and Soheyl Bahrami and Valentin Fuhrmann and Herbert Sch{\"o}chl",
year = "2019",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1097/SHK.0000000000001286",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "497--505",
journal = "SHOCK",
issn = "1073-2322",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of Coagulation Factor Concentrates on Markers of Endothelial Cell Damage in Experimental Hemorrhagic Shock

AU - Hofmann, Nikolaus

AU - Zipperle, Johannes

AU - Brettner, Florian

AU - Jafarmadar, Mohammad

AU - Ashmwe, Mostafa

AU - Keibl, Claudia

AU - Ponschab, Martin

AU - Kipmann, Ulrike

AU - Bahrami, Arian

AU - Redl, Heinz

AU - Bahrami, Soheyl

AU - Fuhrmann, Valentin

AU - Schöchl, Herbert

PY - 2019/11

Y1 - 2019/11

N2 - BACKGROUND: Plasma-based resuscitation showed protective effects on the endothelial glycocalyx compared with crystalloid resuscitation. There is paucity of data regarding the effect of coagulation factor concentrates (CFC) on the glycocalyx in hemorrhagic shock (HS). We hypothesized that colloid-based resuscitation supplemented with CFCs offers a therapeutic value to treat endothelial damage following HS.METHODS: Eighty-four rats were subjected to pressure-controlled (mean arterial pressure (MAP) 30-35 mm Hg) and lab-guided (targeted cutoff: lactate >2.2. mmol/L and base deficit > 5.5 mmol/L) HS. Animals were resuscitated with fresh frozen plasma (FFP), human albumin (HA) or Ringer's lactate (RL) and RL or HA supplemented with fibrinogen concentrate (FC) or prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC). Serum epinephrine and the following markers of endothelial damage were assessed at baseline and at the end-of-observation (120 min after shock was terminated): syndecan-1, heparan sulfate, and soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (sVEGFR 1).RESULTS: Resuscitation with FFP had no effect on sVEGFR1 compared with crystalloid-based resuscitation (FFP: 19.3 ng/mL vs. RL: 15.9 ng/mL; RL+FC: 19.7 ng/mL; RL+PCC: 18.9 ng/mL; n.s.). At the end-of-observation, syndecan-1 was similar among all groups. Interestingly, HA+FC treated animals displayed the highest syndecan-1 concentration (12.07 ng/mL). Resuscitation with FFP restored heparan sulfate back to baseline (baseline: 36 ng/mL vs. end-of-observation: 36 ng/mL).CONCLUSION: The current study revealed that plasma-based resuscitation normalized circulating heparan sulfate but not syndecan-1. Co-administration of CFC had no further effect on glycocalyx shedding suggesting a lack of its therapeutic potential.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: VExperimental in vivo study.

AB - BACKGROUND: Plasma-based resuscitation showed protective effects on the endothelial glycocalyx compared with crystalloid resuscitation. There is paucity of data regarding the effect of coagulation factor concentrates (CFC) on the glycocalyx in hemorrhagic shock (HS). We hypothesized that colloid-based resuscitation supplemented with CFCs offers a therapeutic value to treat endothelial damage following HS.METHODS: Eighty-four rats were subjected to pressure-controlled (mean arterial pressure (MAP) 30-35 mm Hg) and lab-guided (targeted cutoff: lactate >2.2. mmol/L and base deficit > 5.5 mmol/L) HS. Animals were resuscitated with fresh frozen plasma (FFP), human albumin (HA) or Ringer's lactate (RL) and RL or HA supplemented with fibrinogen concentrate (FC) or prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC). Serum epinephrine and the following markers of endothelial damage were assessed at baseline and at the end-of-observation (120 min after shock was terminated): syndecan-1, heparan sulfate, and soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (sVEGFR 1).RESULTS: Resuscitation with FFP had no effect on sVEGFR1 compared with crystalloid-based resuscitation (FFP: 19.3 ng/mL vs. RL: 15.9 ng/mL; RL+FC: 19.7 ng/mL; RL+PCC: 18.9 ng/mL; n.s.). At the end-of-observation, syndecan-1 was similar among all groups. Interestingly, HA+FC treated animals displayed the highest syndecan-1 concentration (12.07 ng/mL). Resuscitation with FFP restored heparan sulfate back to baseline (baseline: 36 ng/mL vs. end-of-observation: 36 ng/mL).CONCLUSION: The current study revealed that plasma-based resuscitation normalized circulating heparan sulfate but not syndecan-1. Co-administration of CFC had no further effect on glycocalyx shedding suggesting a lack of its therapeutic potential.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: VExperimental in vivo study.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001286

DO - 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001286

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 30407369

VL - 52

SP - 497

EP - 505

JO - SHOCK

JF - SHOCK

SN - 1073-2322

IS - 5

ER -