Effect of alloy type and surface conditioning on roughness and bond strength of metal brackets.
Standard
Effect of alloy type and surface conditioning on roughness and bond strength of metal brackets. / Nergiz, Ibrahim; Schmage, Petra; Herrmann, Wolfram; Ozcan, Mutlu.
in: AM J ORTHOD DENTOFAC, Jahrgang 125, Nr. 1, 1, 2004, S. 42-50.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of alloy type and surface conditioning on roughness and bond strength of metal brackets.
AU - Nergiz, Ibrahim
AU - Schmage, Petra
AU - Herrmann, Wolfram
AU - Ozcan, Mutlu
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - The effect of 5 different surface conditioning methods on bonding of metal brackets to cast dental alloys was examined. The surface conditioning methods were fine (30-microm) or rough (125-microm) diamond bur, sandblasting (50-microm or 110-microm aluminum oxide [Al2O3]), and silica coating (30-microm silica). Fifty disc-shaped specimens of 5 different alloys (gold-silver, palladium-silver, nickel-chromium, cobalt-chromium, and titanium) were ground with 1200-grit silicone carbide abrasive and polished before being reused for each conditioning method. Polished surfaces were used as negative controls. After measuring surface roughness (RZ), metal brackets were bonded to the conditioned alloys with a self-curing resin composite. Specimens were thermocycled (5000 times, 5 degrees-55 degrees C, 30 seconds), and shear bond tests were performed. Significantly higher (P.001) in roughness when compared with the controls. The control group showed no resistance to shear forces (0 MPa). Bond values were greater (19 MPa) when silica coating was used, compared with 50-microm Al2O3 (7 MPa) and 110-microm Al2O3 (8 MPa) for all alloys tested. However, interaction between alloys and conditioning methods exhibited significant differences (P
AB - The effect of 5 different surface conditioning methods on bonding of metal brackets to cast dental alloys was examined. The surface conditioning methods were fine (30-microm) or rough (125-microm) diamond bur, sandblasting (50-microm or 110-microm aluminum oxide [Al2O3]), and silica coating (30-microm silica). Fifty disc-shaped specimens of 5 different alloys (gold-silver, palladium-silver, nickel-chromium, cobalt-chromium, and titanium) were ground with 1200-grit silicone carbide abrasive and polished before being reused for each conditioning method. Polished surfaces were used as negative controls. After measuring surface roughness (RZ), metal brackets were bonded to the conditioned alloys with a self-curing resin composite. Specimens were thermocycled (5000 times, 5 degrees-55 degrees C, 30 seconds), and shear bond tests were performed. Significantly higher (P.001) in roughness when compared with the controls. The control group showed no resistance to shear forces (0 MPa). Bond values were greater (19 MPa) when silica coating was used, compared with 50-microm Al2O3 (7 MPa) and 110-microm Al2O3 (8 MPa) for all alloys tested. However, interaction between alloys and conditioning methods exhibited significant differences (P
M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
VL - 125
SP - 42
EP - 50
IS - 1
M1 - 1
ER -
