PortalPublikationenDrain placement can safely be omitted for open partial nephr...

Drain placement can safely be omitted for open partial nephrectomy: Results from a prospective randomized trial

Standard

Drain placement can safely be omitted for open partial nephrectomy: Results from a prospective randomized trial. / Kriegmair, Maximilian C; Mandel, Philipp; Krombach, Patrick; Dönmez, Hasan; John, Axel; Häcker, Axel; Michel, Maurice S.

in: INT J UROL, Jahrgang 23, Nr. 5, 05.2016, S. 390-4.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung

Harvard

Kriegmair, MC, Mandel, P, Krombach, P, Dönmez, H, John, A, Häcker, A & Michel, MS 2016, 'Drain placement can safely be omitted for open partial nephrectomy: Results from a prospective randomized trial', INT J UROL, Jg. 23, Nr. 5, S. 390-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13063

APA

Kriegmair, M. C., Mandel, P., Krombach, P., Dönmez, H., John, A., Häcker, A., & Michel, M. S. (2016). Drain placement can safely be omitted for open partial nephrectomy: Results from a prospective randomized trial. INT J UROL, 23(5), 390-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13063

Vancouver

Kriegmair MC, Mandel P, Krombach P, Dönmez H, John A, Häcker A et al. Drain placement can safely be omitted for open partial nephrectomy: Results from a prospective randomized trial. INT J UROL. 2016 Mai;23(5):390-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13063

Bibtex

@article{b7a42585a7354296875f6c2999a0107e,
title = "Drain placement can safely be omitted for open partial nephrectomy: Results from a prospective randomized trial",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To examine the benefit of drain placement during open partial nephrectomy.METHODS: Overall, 106 patients treated with open partial nephrectomy were enrolled in a prospective randomized trial. Based on the randomization, a drain was placed or omitted. Complications were assessed according to the Clavien classification. Pain level and requirement for analgesics was evaluated according to a customized pattern.RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the two groups regarding age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, tumor size and nephrometry (preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical classification). In terms of overall and drain-related complications, no advantage of placing a drain could be proven (P = 0.249). Patients with a drain suffered from a significantly higher pain level (P = 0.01) and showed prolonged mobilization (P < 0.001). There was no difference in bowel movements and requirement of additional analgesics (P = 0.347 and 0.11).CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study suggest that drain placement during open partial nephrectomy can safely be omitted, even in cases with violation of the collecting system.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Kriegmair, {Maximilian C} and Philipp Mandel and Patrick Krombach and Hasan D{\"o}nmez and Axel John and Axel H{\"a}cker and Michel, {Maurice S}",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2016 The Japanese Urological Association.",
year = "2016",
month = may,
doi = "10.1111/iju.13063",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "390--4",
journal = "INT J UROL",
issn = "0919-8172",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Drain placement can safely be omitted for open partial nephrectomy: Results from a prospective randomized trial

AU - Kriegmair, Maximilian C

AU - Mandel, Philipp

AU - Krombach, Patrick

AU - Dönmez, Hasan

AU - John, Axel

AU - Häcker, Axel

AU - Michel, Maurice S

N1 - © 2016 The Japanese Urological Association.

PY - 2016/5

Y1 - 2016/5

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To examine the benefit of drain placement during open partial nephrectomy.METHODS: Overall, 106 patients treated with open partial nephrectomy were enrolled in a prospective randomized trial. Based on the randomization, a drain was placed or omitted. Complications were assessed according to the Clavien classification. Pain level and requirement for analgesics was evaluated according to a customized pattern.RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the two groups regarding age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, tumor size and nephrometry (preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical classification). In terms of overall and drain-related complications, no advantage of placing a drain could be proven (P = 0.249). Patients with a drain suffered from a significantly higher pain level (P = 0.01) and showed prolonged mobilization (P < 0.001). There was no difference in bowel movements and requirement of additional analgesics (P = 0.347 and 0.11).CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study suggest that drain placement during open partial nephrectomy can safely be omitted, even in cases with violation of the collecting system.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To examine the benefit of drain placement during open partial nephrectomy.METHODS: Overall, 106 patients treated with open partial nephrectomy were enrolled in a prospective randomized trial. Based on the randomization, a drain was placed or omitted. Complications were assessed according to the Clavien classification. Pain level and requirement for analgesics was evaluated according to a customized pattern.RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the two groups regarding age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, tumor size and nephrometry (preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical classification). In terms of overall and drain-related complications, no advantage of placing a drain could be proven (P = 0.249). Patients with a drain suffered from a significantly higher pain level (P = 0.01) and showed prolonged mobilization (P < 0.001). There was no difference in bowel movements and requirement of additional analgesics (P = 0.347 and 0.11).CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study suggest that drain placement during open partial nephrectomy can safely be omitted, even in cases with violation of the collecting system.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1111/iju.13063

DO - 10.1111/iju.13063

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 26890474

VL - 23

SP - 390

EP - 394

JO - INT J UROL

JF - INT J UROL

SN - 0919-8172

IS - 5

ER -