Dolutegravir as First- or Second-Line Treatment for HIV-1 Infection in Children

  • Anna Turkova
  • Ellen White
  • Hilda A Mujuru
  • Adeodata R Kekitiinwa
  • Cissy M Kityo
  • Avy Violari
  • Abbas Lugemwa
  • Tim R Cressey
  • Philippa Musoke
  • Ebrahim Variava
  • Mark F Cotton
  • Moherndran Archary
  • Thanyawee Puthanakit
  • Osee Behuhuma
  • Robin Kobbe
  • Steven B Welch
  • Mutsa Bwakura-Dangarembizi
  • Pauline Amuge
  • Elizabeth Kaudha
  • Linda Barlow-Mosha
  • Shafic Makumbi
  • Nastassja Ramsagar
  • Chaiwat Ngampiyaskul
  • Godfrey Musoro
  • Lorna Atwine
  • Afaaf Liberty
  • Victor Musiime
  • Dickson Bbuye
  • Grace M Ahimbisibwe
  • Suwalai Chalermpantmetagul
  • Shabinah Ali
  • Tatiana Sarfati
  • Ben Wynne
  • Clare Shakeshaft
  • Angela Colbers
  • Nigel Klein
  • Sarah Bernays
  • Yacine Saïdi
  • Alexandra Coelho
  • Tiziana Grossele
  • Alexandra Compagnucci
  • Carlo Giaquinto
  • Pablo Rojo
  • Deborah Ford
  • Diana M Gibb
  • ODYSSEY Trial Team

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Children with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection have limited options for effective antiretroviral treatment (ART).

METHODS: We conducted an open-label, randomized, noninferiority trial comparing three-drug ART based on the HIV integrase inhibitor dolutegravir with standard care (non-dolutegravir-based ART) in children and adolescents starting first- or second-line ART. The primary end point was the proportion of participants with virologic or clinical treatment failure by 96 weeks, as estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Safety was assessed.

RESULTS: From September 2016 through June 2018, a total of 707 children and adolescents who weighed at least 14 kg were randomly assigned to receive dolutegravir-based ART (350 participants) or standard care (357). The median age was 12.2 years (range, 2.9 to 18.0), the median weight was 30.7 kg (range, 14.0 to 85.0), and 49% of the participants were girls. By design, 311 participants (44%) started first-line ART (with 92% of those in the standard-care group receiving efavirenz-based ART), and 396 (56%) started second-line ART (with 98% of those in the standard-care group receiving boosted protease inhibitor-based ART). The median follow-up was 142 weeks. By 96 weeks, 47 participants in the dolutegravir group and 75 in the standard-care group had treatment failure (estimated probability, 0.14 vs. 0.22; difference, -0.08; 95% confidence interval, -0.14 to -0.03; P = 0.004). Treatment effects were similar with first- and second-line therapies (P = 0.16 for heterogeneity). A total of 35 participants in the dolutegravir group and 40 in the standard-care group had at least one serious adverse event (P = 0.53), and 73 and 86, respectively, had at least one adverse event of grade 3 or higher (P = 0.24). At least one ART-modifying adverse event occurred in 5 participants in the dolutegravir group and in 17 in the standard-care group (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: In this trial involving children and adolescents with HIV-1 infection who were starting first- or second-line treatment, dolutegravir-based ART was superior to standard care. (Funded by ViiV Healthcare; ODYSSEY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02259127; EUDRACT number, 2014-002632-14; and ISRCTN number, ISRCTN91737921.).

Bibliografische Daten

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ISSN0028-4793
DOIs
StatusVeröffentlicht - 30.12.2021

Anmerkungen des Dekanats

Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society.

PubMed 34965338