Do young patients with renal cell carcinoma feature a distinct outcome after surgery? A comparative analysis of patient age based on the multinational CORONA database
Standard
Do young patients with renal cell carcinoma feature a distinct outcome after surgery? A comparative analysis of patient age based on the multinational CORONA database. / Aziz, Atiqullah; May, Matthias; Zigeuner, Richard; Pichler, Martin; Chromecki, Thomas; Cindolo, Luca; Schips, Luigi; De Cobelli, Ottavio; Rocco, Bernardo; De Nunzio, Cosimo; Tubaro, Andrea; Coman, Ioan; Truss, Michael; Dalpiaz, Orietta; Hoschke, Bernd; Gilfrich, Christian; Feciche, Bogdan; Fenske, Fabian; Sountoulides, Petros; Figenshau, Robert S; Madison, Kerry; Sánchez-Chapado, Manuel; Del Carmen Santiago Martin, Maria; Wieland, Wolf F; Salzano, Luigi; Lotrecchiano, Giuseppe; Waidelich, Raphaela; Stief, Christian; Brookman-May, Sabine; Members of the CORONA Project and the Young Academic Urologists Renal Cancer Group.
in: J UROLOGY, Jahrgang 191, Nr. 2, 01.02.2014, S. 310-315.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Do young patients with renal cell carcinoma feature a distinct outcome after surgery? A comparative analysis of patient age based on the multinational CORONA database
AU - Aziz, Atiqullah
AU - May, Matthias
AU - Zigeuner, Richard
AU - Pichler, Martin
AU - Chromecki, Thomas
AU - Cindolo, Luca
AU - Schips, Luigi
AU - De Cobelli, Ottavio
AU - Rocco, Bernardo
AU - De Nunzio, Cosimo
AU - Tubaro, Andrea
AU - Coman, Ioan
AU - Truss, Michael
AU - Dalpiaz, Orietta
AU - Hoschke, Bernd
AU - Gilfrich, Christian
AU - Feciche, Bogdan
AU - Fenske, Fabian
AU - Sountoulides, Petros
AU - Figenshau, Robert S
AU - Madison, Kerry
AU - Sánchez-Chapado, Manuel
AU - Del Carmen Santiago Martin, Maria
AU - Wieland, Wolf F
AU - Salzano, Luigi
AU - Lotrecchiano, Giuseppe
AU - Waidelich, Raphaela
AU - Stief, Christian
AU - Brookman-May, Sabine
AU - Members of the CORONA Project and the Young Academic Urologists Renal Cancer Group
N1 - Copyright © 2014 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2014/2/1
Y1 - 2014/2/1
N2 - PURPOSE: We analyzed the distinct clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients with renal cell carcinoma age 40 years or less compared to a reference group of patients 60 to 70 years old.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall 2,572 patients retrieved from a multicenter international database comprised of 6,234 patients with surgically treated renal cell carcinoma were included in this retrospective study. Clinical and histopathological features of 297 patients 40 years old or younger (4.8%) were compared to those of 2,275 patients (36.5%) 60 to 70 years old, who served as the reference group. Median followup was 59 months. The impact of young age and further parameters on disease specific mortality and all cause mortality was evaluated by multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses.RESULTS: Young patients more frequently underwent nephron sparing surgery (27% vs 20%, p = 0.008) and regional lymph node dissection compared to older patients (38% vs 32%, p = 0.025). Organ confined tumor stage (81% vs 70%, p <0.001), smaller tumor diameter (4.5 vs 4.7 cm, p = 0.014) and chromophobe subtype (10% vs 4%, p <0.001) were significantly more frequent in young patients. On multivariate analysis older patients had a higher disease specific (HR 2.21, p <0.001) and all cause mortality (HR 3.05, p <0.001). The c indices for the Cox models were 0.87 and 0.78, respectively. However, integration of the variable age group did not significantly increase the predictive accuracy of the disease specific and all cause mortality models.CONCLUSIONS: Young patients with renal cell carcinoma (40 years old or younger) have significantly different frequencies of clinical and histopathological features, and a significantly lower all cause and disease specific mortality compared to patients 60 to 70 years old.
AB - PURPOSE: We analyzed the distinct clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients with renal cell carcinoma age 40 years or less compared to a reference group of patients 60 to 70 years old.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall 2,572 patients retrieved from a multicenter international database comprised of 6,234 patients with surgically treated renal cell carcinoma were included in this retrospective study. Clinical and histopathological features of 297 patients 40 years old or younger (4.8%) were compared to those of 2,275 patients (36.5%) 60 to 70 years old, who served as the reference group. Median followup was 59 months. The impact of young age and further parameters on disease specific mortality and all cause mortality was evaluated by multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses.RESULTS: Young patients more frequently underwent nephron sparing surgery (27% vs 20%, p = 0.008) and regional lymph node dissection compared to older patients (38% vs 32%, p = 0.025). Organ confined tumor stage (81% vs 70%, p <0.001), smaller tumor diameter (4.5 vs 4.7 cm, p = 0.014) and chromophobe subtype (10% vs 4%, p <0.001) were significantly more frequent in young patients. On multivariate analysis older patients had a higher disease specific (HR 2.21, p <0.001) and all cause mortality (HR 3.05, p <0.001). The c indices for the Cox models were 0.87 and 0.78, respectively. However, integration of the variable age group did not significantly increase the predictive accuracy of the disease specific and all cause mortality models.CONCLUSIONS: Young patients with renal cell carcinoma (40 years old or younger) have significantly different frequencies of clinical and histopathological features, and a significantly lower all cause and disease specific mortality compared to patients 60 to 70 years old.
KW - Adult
KW - Age Factors
KW - Aged
KW - Area Under Curve
KW - Carcinoma, Renal Cell
KW - Databases, Factual
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Kidney Neoplasms
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Multivariate Analysis
KW - Prognosis
KW - Proportional Hazards Models
U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2013.08.021
DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2013.08.021
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 23973516
VL - 191
SP - 310
EP - 315
JO - J UROLOGY
JF - J UROLOGY
SN - 0022-5347
IS - 2
ER -