Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonist after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

  • Christopher Hohmann
  • Roman Pfister
  • Christian Frerker
  • Andreas Beckmann
  • Thomas Walther
  • Sabine Bleiziffer
  • Stephan Ensminger
  • Raffi Bekeredjian
  • Moritz Seiffert
  • Jan-Malte Sinning
  • Helge Möllmann
  • Friedhelm Beyersdorf
  • Stephan Baldus
  • Andreas Böning
  • Eva Herrmann
  • Ümniye Balaban
  • Elmar Kuhn
  • GARY Executive Board

Beteiligte Einrichtungen

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: After transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), the optimal regimen of anticoagulant therapy in patients with an additional indication for oral anticoagulation remains a matter of debate. This study investigates the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients after TAVI in a real-world population.

METHODS: The German Aortic Valve RegistrY (GARY) is a prospective, multicentre registry enrolling patients undergoing invasive treatment for aortic valve disease. From January 2011 to December 2019, 1 41 790 patients from 92 hospitals in Germany were enrolled. Anticoagulatory treatment regimens were assessed at hospital discharge for patients after TAVI procedures. All-cause mortality and the combined endpoint 'cardiac and cerebrovascular events' containing myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischaemic attack, aortic prosthesis reintervention and all-cause mortality in the first year after TAVI were examined by treatment regimen.

RESULTS: Of 45 598 patients (mean age 80.7±5.7 years, 49.3% males) undergoing TAVI, 16 974 patients (37.2%) received an anticoagulant regimen that included VKA or DOAC. Hereof, the majority of patients were prescribed VKA (n=11 333, 66.8%) compared with DOAC (n=5641, 33.2%) with an increase of DOAC use from 9.4% in 2011 to 69.9% in 2019. During the 1-year follow-up, the absolute event rates per 100 person-years for all-cause mortality and the combined endpoint cardiac and cerebrovascular events were 1.9 and 1.3 for VKA-treated and 1.7 and 1.2 for DOAC-treated patients, respectively. After adjustment for baseline confounders, all-cause mortality (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.01, p=0.114) and cardiac and cerebrovascular event-free survival (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.01, p=0.071) did not differ significantly between VKA and DOAC groups.

CONCLUSIONS: This study supports evidence of the efficacy of DOAC use after TAVI in patients with an indication for oral anticoagulation.

Bibliografische Daten

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ISSN1355-6037
DOIs
StatusVeröffentlicht - 26.10.2023

Anmerkungen des Dekanats

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

PubMed 37407220