Differential prognostic impact of different Gleason patterns in grade group 4 in radical prostatectomy specimens

Standard

Differential prognostic impact of different Gleason patterns in grade group 4 in radical prostatectomy specimens. / Mori, Keiichiro; Sharma, Vidit; Comperat, Eva M; Sato, Shun; Laukhtina, Ekaterina; Schuettfort, Victor M; Pradere, Benjamin; Parizi, Mehdi Kardoust; Karakiewicz, Pierre I; Egawa, Shin; Tilki, Derya; Boorjian, Stephen A; Shariat, Shahrokh F.

in: EJSO-EUR J SURG ONC, Jahrgang 47, Nr. 5, 05.2021, S. 1172-1178.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Mori, K, Sharma, V, Comperat, EM, Sato, S, Laukhtina, E, Schuettfort, VM, Pradere, B, Parizi, MK, Karakiewicz, PI, Egawa, S, Tilki, D, Boorjian, SA & Shariat, SF 2021, 'Differential prognostic impact of different Gleason patterns in grade group 4 in radical prostatectomy specimens', EJSO-EUR J SURG ONC, Jg. 47, Nr. 5, S. 1172-1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2020.12.014

APA

Mori, K., Sharma, V., Comperat, E. M., Sato, S., Laukhtina, E., Schuettfort, V. M., Pradere, B., Parizi, M. K., Karakiewicz, P. I., Egawa, S., Tilki, D., Boorjian, S. A., & Shariat, S. F. (2021). Differential prognostic impact of different Gleason patterns in grade group 4 in radical prostatectomy specimens. EJSO-EUR J SURG ONC, 47(5), 1172-1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2020.12.014

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{2d11d84049b049c6a735668ca9e8940a,
title = "Differential prognostic impact of different Gleason patterns in grade group 4 in radical prostatectomy specimens",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: There are questions regarding whether grade group (GG) 4 prostate cancer (PC) is heterogeneous in terms of prognosis. We assessed prognostic differences in PC patients within GG 4 treated with radical prostatectomy (RP).MATERIAL AND METHODS: Biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival were analyzed in 787 PC patients with GG 4 based on RP pathology (Gleason score (GS) 3 + 5: 189, GS 4 + 4: 500, and GS 5 + 3: 98). Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess factors predictive of high-risk surgical pathological features. Cox regression models were used to evaluate potential prognostic factors of survival.RESULTS: Within a median follow-up of 86 months, 378 patients (48.0%) experienced BCR and 96 patients (12.2%) died, 42 of whom (5.3%) died of PC. GS 5 + 3 was significantly associated with worse BCR-free and cancer-specific survival, as well as higher positive surgical margin, lymph node metastasis, extraprostatic extension, and non-organ-confined disease rates, than GS 3 + 5 and higher positive surgical margin, lymph node metastasis, extraprostatic extension, and non-organ-confined disease rates than GS 4 + 4 (P < 0.05). GS 4 + 4 was significantly associated with worse BCR-free survival and higher extraprostatic extension, and non-organ-confined disease rates than GS 3 + 5 (P < 0.05). Inclusion of the different Gleason patterns improved the discrimination of a model for prediction of all survival outcomes compared to standard prognosticators.CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable heterogeneity within GG 4 in terms of oncological and surgical pathological outcomes. Primary and secondary Gleason patterns should be considered to stratify high-risk PC patients after RP.",
author = "Keiichiro Mori and Vidit Sharma and Comperat, {Eva M} and Shun Sato and Ekaterina Laukhtina and Schuettfort, {Victor M} and Benjamin Pradere and Parizi, {Mehdi Kardoust} and Karakiewicz, {Pierre I} and Shin Egawa and Derya Tilki and Boorjian, {Stephen A} and Shariat, {Shahrokh F}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.",
year = "2021",
month = may,
doi = "10.1016/j.ejso.2020.12.014",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "1172--1178",
journal = "EJSO-EUR J SURG ONC",
issn = "0748-7983",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differential prognostic impact of different Gleason patterns in grade group 4 in radical prostatectomy specimens

AU - Mori, Keiichiro

AU - Sharma, Vidit

AU - Comperat, Eva M

AU - Sato, Shun

AU - Laukhtina, Ekaterina

AU - Schuettfort, Victor M

AU - Pradere, Benjamin

AU - Parizi, Mehdi Kardoust

AU - Karakiewicz, Pierre I

AU - Egawa, Shin

AU - Tilki, Derya

AU - Boorjian, Stephen A

AU - Shariat, Shahrokh F

N1 - Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

PY - 2021/5

Y1 - 2021/5

N2 - INTRODUCTION: There are questions regarding whether grade group (GG) 4 prostate cancer (PC) is heterogeneous in terms of prognosis. We assessed prognostic differences in PC patients within GG 4 treated with radical prostatectomy (RP).MATERIAL AND METHODS: Biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival were analyzed in 787 PC patients with GG 4 based on RP pathology (Gleason score (GS) 3 + 5: 189, GS 4 + 4: 500, and GS 5 + 3: 98). Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess factors predictive of high-risk surgical pathological features. Cox regression models were used to evaluate potential prognostic factors of survival.RESULTS: Within a median follow-up of 86 months, 378 patients (48.0%) experienced BCR and 96 patients (12.2%) died, 42 of whom (5.3%) died of PC. GS 5 + 3 was significantly associated with worse BCR-free and cancer-specific survival, as well as higher positive surgical margin, lymph node metastasis, extraprostatic extension, and non-organ-confined disease rates, than GS 3 + 5 and higher positive surgical margin, lymph node metastasis, extraprostatic extension, and non-organ-confined disease rates than GS 4 + 4 (P < 0.05). GS 4 + 4 was significantly associated with worse BCR-free survival and higher extraprostatic extension, and non-organ-confined disease rates than GS 3 + 5 (P < 0.05). Inclusion of the different Gleason patterns improved the discrimination of a model for prediction of all survival outcomes compared to standard prognosticators.CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable heterogeneity within GG 4 in terms of oncological and surgical pathological outcomes. Primary and secondary Gleason patterns should be considered to stratify high-risk PC patients after RP.

AB - INTRODUCTION: There are questions regarding whether grade group (GG) 4 prostate cancer (PC) is heterogeneous in terms of prognosis. We assessed prognostic differences in PC patients within GG 4 treated with radical prostatectomy (RP).MATERIAL AND METHODS: Biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival were analyzed in 787 PC patients with GG 4 based on RP pathology (Gleason score (GS) 3 + 5: 189, GS 4 + 4: 500, and GS 5 + 3: 98). Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess factors predictive of high-risk surgical pathological features. Cox regression models were used to evaluate potential prognostic factors of survival.RESULTS: Within a median follow-up of 86 months, 378 patients (48.0%) experienced BCR and 96 patients (12.2%) died, 42 of whom (5.3%) died of PC. GS 5 + 3 was significantly associated with worse BCR-free and cancer-specific survival, as well as higher positive surgical margin, lymph node metastasis, extraprostatic extension, and non-organ-confined disease rates, than GS 3 + 5 and higher positive surgical margin, lymph node metastasis, extraprostatic extension, and non-organ-confined disease rates than GS 4 + 4 (P < 0.05). GS 4 + 4 was significantly associated with worse BCR-free survival and higher extraprostatic extension, and non-organ-confined disease rates than GS 3 + 5 (P < 0.05). Inclusion of the different Gleason patterns improved the discrimination of a model for prediction of all survival outcomes compared to standard prognosticators.CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable heterogeneity within GG 4 in terms of oncological and surgical pathological outcomes. Primary and secondary Gleason patterns should be considered to stratify high-risk PC patients after RP.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.12.014

DO - 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.12.014

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 33371950

VL - 47

SP - 1172

EP - 1178

JO - EJSO-EUR J SURG ONC

JF - EJSO-EUR J SURG ONC

SN - 0748-7983

IS - 5

ER -