PortalPublikationenDifferences in Patient and Physician Assessment of a Dynamic...

Differences in Patient and Physician Assessment of a Dynamic Patient Reported Outcome Tool for Chronic Pruritus

Standard

Differences in Patient and Physician Assessment of a Dynamic Patient Reported Outcome Tool for Chronic Pruritus. / Fritz, F; Blome, C; Augustin, M; Koch, R; Ständer, S.

in: J EUR ACAD DERMATOL, Jahrgang 30, Nr. 6, 06.2016, S. 962-965.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung

Harvard

Fritz, F, Blome, C, Augustin, M, Koch, R & Ständer, S 2016, 'Differences in Patient and Physician Assessment of a Dynamic Patient Reported Outcome Tool for Chronic Pruritus', J EUR ACAD DERMATOL, Jg. 30, Nr. 6, S. 962-965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13214

APA

Fritz, F., Blome, C., Augustin, M., Koch, R., & Ständer, S. (2016). Differences in Patient and Physician Assessment of a Dynamic Patient Reported Outcome Tool for Chronic Pruritus. J EUR ACAD DERMATOL, 30(6), 962-965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13214

Vancouver

Fritz F, Blome C, Augustin M, Koch R, Ständer S. Differences in Patient and Physician Assessment of a Dynamic Patient Reported Outcome Tool for Chronic Pruritus. J EUR ACAD DERMATOL. 2016 Jun;30(6):962-965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13214

Bibtex

@article{10d9753286df48a4bc6c31e7f24423aa,
title = "Differences in Patient and Physician Assessment of a Dynamic Patient Reported Outcome Tool for Chronic Pruritus",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Chronic pruritus is a subjective symptom, mainly measured through patient reported outcomes. Our aim is to assess two different methods regarding the change of symptoms: a visual dynamic pruritus score (vDPS) documented by patients, and a numerical value (nDPS) documented by physicians.METHODS: Inferential statistics and reliability analyses have been performed on data collected in 2013.RESULTS: Data of 701 patients were analysed (45.6% males, 54.4% females, mean age 60 ± 16 years). The nDPS showed less extreme and generally lower values than the vDPS. There was a slight concordance between both methods; the highest concordance was seen for no/weak change and very good reduction.CONCLUSION: The difference between patient and physician assessed same score points to an important bias in pruritus assessment which has to be taken into account especially in clinical trials. Though further studies are needed, the patient-based assessment seems to be less biased by a social desirability effect.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "F Fritz and C Blome and M Augustin and R Koch and S St{\"a}nder",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2015 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.",
year = "2016",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1111/jdv.13214",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "962--965",
journal = "J EUR ACAD DERMATOL",
issn = "0926-9959",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differences in Patient and Physician Assessment of a Dynamic Patient Reported Outcome Tool for Chronic Pruritus

AU - Fritz, F

AU - Blome, C

AU - Augustin, M

AU - Koch, R

AU - Ständer, S

N1 - © 2015 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

PY - 2016/6

Y1 - 2016/6

N2 - BACKGROUND: Chronic pruritus is a subjective symptom, mainly measured through patient reported outcomes. Our aim is to assess two different methods regarding the change of symptoms: a visual dynamic pruritus score (vDPS) documented by patients, and a numerical value (nDPS) documented by physicians.METHODS: Inferential statistics and reliability analyses have been performed on data collected in 2013.RESULTS: Data of 701 patients were analysed (45.6% males, 54.4% females, mean age 60 ± 16 years). The nDPS showed less extreme and generally lower values than the vDPS. There was a slight concordance between both methods; the highest concordance was seen for no/weak change and very good reduction.CONCLUSION: The difference between patient and physician assessed same score points to an important bias in pruritus assessment which has to be taken into account especially in clinical trials. Though further studies are needed, the patient-based assessment seems to be less biased by a social desirability effect.

AB - BACKGROUND: Chronic pruritus is a subjective symptom, mainly measured through patient reported outcomes. Our aim is to assess two different methods regarding the change of symptoms: a visual dynamic pruritus score (vDPS) documented by patients, and a numerical value (nDPS) documented by physicians.METHODS: Inferential statistics and reliability analyses have been performed on data collected in 2013.RESULTS: Data of 701 patients were analysed (45.6% males, 54.4% females, mean age 60 ± 16 years). The nDPS showed less extreme and generally lower values than the vDPS. There was a slight concordance between both methods; the highest concordance was seen for no/weak change and very good reduction.CONCLUSION: The difference between patient and physician assessed same score points to an important bias in pruritus assessment which has to be taken into account especially in clinical trials. Though further studies are needed, the patient-based assessment seems to be less biased by a social desirability effect.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1111/jdv.13214

DO - 10.1111/jdv.13214

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 26274801

VL - 30

SP - 962

EP - 965

JO - J EUR ACAD DERMATOL

JF - J EUR ACAD DERMATOL

SN - 0926-9959

IS - 6

ER -