Differences between rural and urban prostate cancer patients

  • Lara Franziska Stolzenbach
  • Marina Deuker
  • Claudia Collà-Ruvolo
  • Luigi Nocera
  • Zhe Tian
  • Tobias Maurer
  • Derya Tilki
  • Alberto Briganti
  • Fred Saad
  • Vincenzo Mirone
  • Felix K H Chun
  • Markus Graefen
  • Pierre I Karakiewicz

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that the residency status (rural area [RA] vs urban clusters [UC] vs urban areas [UA]) affects stage and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in contemporary newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa) patients of all stages, regardless of treatment.

METHODS: Newly diagnosed PCa patients with available residency status were abstracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2016). Propensity-score (PS) matching, cumulative incidence plots, multivariate competing-risks regression (CRR) models were used.

RESULTS: Of 531,468 PCa patients of all stages, 6653 (1.3%) resided in RA, 50,932 (9.6%) in UC and 473,883 (89.2%) in UA. No statistically significant or clinically meaningful differences in stage at presentation or CSM were recorded. Conversely, 10-year other cause-mortality (OCM) rates were 27.2% vs 23.7% vs 18.9% (p < 0.001) in RA vs UC vs UA patients, respectively. In CRR models, RA (subhazard ratio [SHR] 1.38; p < 0.001) and UC (SHR 1.18; p < 0.001) were independent predictors for higher OCM relative to UA. These differences remained statistically significant in fully PS-adjusted multivariate CRR models.

CONCLUSION: RA, and to a lesser extent UC, PCa patients are at higher risk of OCM than UA patients. Higher OCM may indicate shorter life expectancy and should be considered in treatment decision making.

Bibliografische Daten

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ISSN0724-4983
DOIs
StatusVeröffentlicht - 07.2021
Extern publiziertJa
PubMed 33155063