Die anatomische Rekonstruktion des Hüftgelenks: ein Vergleich von Kurz- und Standardschaft

Standard

Die anatomische Rekonstruktion des Hüftgelenks: ein Vergleich von Kurz- und Standardschaft. / Ries, C; Schopf, W; Dietrich, F; Franke, S; Jakubowitz, E; Sobau, C; Heisel, C.

in: Z ORTHOP UNFALLCHIR, Jahrgang 153, Nr. 1, 02.2015, S. 46-50.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Ries, C, Schopf, W, Dietrich, F, Franke, S, Jakubowitz, E, Sobau, C & Heisel, C 2015, 'Die anatomische Rekonstruktion des Hüftgelenks: ein Vergleich von Kurz- und Standardschaft', Z ORTHOP UNFALLCHIR, Jg. 153, Nr. 1, S. 46-50. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1396230

APA

Ries, C., Schopf, W., Dietrich, F., Franke, S., Jakubowitz, E., Sobau, C., & Heisel, C. (2015). Die anatomische Rekonstruktion des Hüftgelenks: ein Vergleich von Kurz- und Standardschaft. Z ORTHOP UNFALLCHIR, 153(1), 46-50. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1396230

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{84f15d01e9a54b9ea8b4396cb747dfde,
title = "Die anatomische Rekonstruktion des H{\"u}ftgelenks: ein Vergleich von Kurz- und Standardschaft",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Currently, short cementless femoral stems are alternative implants to treat osteoarthritis in young patients with sufficient bone quality in order to get a more proximal load transfer. The purpose of the present study was to biomechanically compare joint reconstructions resulting from implantations of a short-stemmed and a conventional hip replacement.METHODS: 100 patients (50 short-stemmed and 50 conventional) were retrospectively examined. For evaluation of biomechanical parameters standardised pre- and postoperative X-rays (pelvic AP views) were used and digitally analysed.RESULTS: The horizontal femoral off-set increased within both groups (short: 2.0 mm and conventional: 3.3 mm), with a significant increase in the conventional group. The hip centre of rotation was significantly medialised after both procedures (short: 6.0 mm and conventional: 4.2 mm). Limb length was shorter preoperatively at the arthroplasty side, but increased thereafter (short: 2.1 mm and conventional: 2.6 mm). Compared to the native contralateral side the limb length was almost equal after THA (short: 0.7 mm and conventional: 0.8 mm).CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that an almost anatomic reconstruction of hip joint biomechanics is possible with a short-stemmed prosthesis compared to a conventional stem, regarding limb length, centre of rotation and offset.",
keywords = "Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/instrumentation, Equipment Failure Analysis, Female, Hip Joint/diagnostic imaging, Hip Prosthesis, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Osteoarthritis, Hip/diagnosis, Prosthesis Design, Radiography, Range of Motion, Articular, Treatment Outcome",
author = "C Ries and W Schopf and F Dietrich and S Franke and E Jakubowitz and C Sobau and C Heisel",
note = "Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.",
year = "2015",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1055/s-0034-1396230",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "153",
pages = "46--50",
journal = "Z ORTHOP UNFALLCHIR",
issn = "1864-6697",
publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag KG",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Die anatomische Rekonstruktion des Hüftgelenks: ein Vergleich von Kurz- und Standardschaft

AU - Ries, C

AU - Schopf, W

AU - Dietrich, F

AU - Franke, S

AU - Jakubowitz, E

AU - Sobau, C

AU - Heisel, C

N1 - Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

PY - 2015/2

Y1 - 2015/2

N2 - BACKGROUND: Currently, short cementless femoral stems are alternative implants to treat osteoarthritis in young patients with sufficient bone quality in order to get a more proximal load transfer. The purpose of the present study was to biomechanically compare joint reconstructions resulting from implantations of a short-stemmed and a conventional hip replacement.METHODS: 100 patients (50 short-stemmed and 50 conventional) were retrospectively examined. For evaluation of biomechanical parameters standardised pre- and postoperative X-rays (pelvic AP views) were used and digitally analysed.RESULTS: The horizontal femoral off-set increased within both groups (short: 2.0 mm and conventional: 3.3 mm), with a significant increase in the conventional group. The hip centre of rotation was significantly medialised after both procedures (short: 6.0 mm and conventional: 4.2 mm). Limb length was shorter preoperatively at the arthroplasty side, but increased thereafter (short: 2.1 mm and conventional: 2.6 mm). Compared to the native contralateral side the limb length was almost equal after THA (short: 0.7 mm and conventional: 0.8 mm).CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that an almost anatomic reconstruction of hip joint biomechanics is possible with a short-stemmed prosthesis compared to a conventional stem, regarding limb length, centre of rotation and offset.

AB - BACKGROUND: Currently, short cementless femoral stems are alternative implants to treat osteoarthritis in young patients with sufficient bone quality in order to get a more proximal load transfer. The purpose of the present study was to biomechanically compare joint reconstructions resulting from implantations of a short-stemmed and a conventional hip replacement.METHODS: 100 patients (50 short-stemmed and 50 conventional) were retrospectively examined. For evaluation of biomechanical parameters standardised pre- and postoperative X-rays (pelvic AP views) were used and digitally analysed.RESULTS: The horizontal femoral off-set increased within both groups (short: 2.0 mm and conventional: 3.3 mm), with a significant increase in the conventional group. The hip centre of rotation was significantly medialised after both procedures (short: 6.0 mm and conventional: 4.2 mm). Limb length was shorter preoperatively at the arthroplasty side, but increased thereafter (short: 2.1 mm and conventional: 2.6 mm). Compared to the native contralateral side the limb length was almost equal after THA (short: 0.7 mm and conventional: 0.8 mm).CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that an almost anatomic reconstruction of hip joint biomechanics is possible with a short-stemmed prosthesis compared to a conventional stem, regarding limb length, centre of rotation and offset.

KW - Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/instrumentation

KW - Equipment Failure Analysis

KW - Female

KW - Hip Joint/diagnostic imaging

KW - Hip Prosthesis

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Osteoarthritis, Hip/diagnosis

KW - Prosthesis Design

KW - Radiography

KW - Range of Motion, Articular

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.1055/s-0034-1396230

DO - 10.1055/s-0034-1396230

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

C2 - 25723580

VL - 153

SP - 46

EP - 50

JO - Z ORTHOP UNFALLCHIR

JF - Z ORTHOP UNFALLCHIR

SN - 1864-6697

IS - 1

ER -