[Diagnosis and therapy of gestational diabetes--comparison of two surveys of established gynecologists in Berlin and Saxonia-Anhalt ]

Standard

[Diagnosis and therapy of gestational diabetes--comparison of two surveys of established gynecologists in Berlin and Saxonia-Anhalt ]. / Lüke, C; Kemper, I; Henschen, S; Bühling, Kai J.

in: Z GEBURTSH NEONATOL, Jahrgang 209, Nr. 6, 6, 2005, S. 219-222.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{ddbe5f7db8d541719dad4e08e835d17b,
title = "[Diagnosis and therapy of gestational diabetes--comparison of two surveys of established gynecologists in Berlin and Saxonia-Anhalt ]",
abstract = "PURPOSE: The diagnosis and treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus is controversial. We undertook a survey of obstetricians/gynaecologists to identify current screening practices and differences between Saxonia-Anhalt and Berlin. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 267 practicing obstetricians/gynaecologists in Saxonia-Anhalt and 441 in Berlin. The questionnaires included items on the diagnosis and treatment of gestational diabetes. RESULTS: A response rate of 37 % in Saxonia-Anhalt and 35 % in Berlin was achieved. 90 % of the respondents would welcome the integration of a general screening for gestational diabetes into the standard German prenatal care plan. In spite of this great support only 37 % of the obstetricians/gynaecologists in Saxonia-Anhalt and 36 % in Berlin screened their patients generally. Important risk factors for the screening were rarely or not mentioned. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: The survey confirms disparate policies regarding the screening for and treatment of gestational diabetes. There are differences between Saxonia-Anhalt and Berlin. This can only be changed by appropriate inclusion in the German prenatal care plan.",
author = "C L{\"u}ke and I Kemper and S Henschen and B{\"u}hling, {Kai J.}",
year = "2005",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "209",
pages = "219--222",
journal = "Z GEBURTSH NEONATOL",
issn = "0948-2393",
publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag KG",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - [Diagnosis and therapy of gestational diabetes--comparison of two surveys of established gynecologists in Berlin and Saxonia-Anhalt ]

AU - Lüke, C

AU - Kemper, I

AU - Henschen, S

AU - Bühling, Kai J.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - PURPOSE: The diagnosis and treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus is controversial. We undertook a survey of obstetricians/gynaecologists to identify current screening practices and differences between Saxonia-Anhalt and Berlin. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 267 practicing obstetricians/gynaecologists in Saxonia-Anhalt and 441 in Berlin. The questionnaires included items on the diagnosis and treatment of gestational diabetes. RESULTS: A response rate of 37 % in Saxonia-Anhalt and 35 % in Berlin was achieved. 90 % of the respondents would welcome the integration of a general screening for gestational diabetes into the standard German prenatal care plan. In spite of this great support only 37 % of the obstetricians/gynaecologists in Saxonia-Anhalt and 36 % in Berlin screened their patients generally. Important risk factors for the screening were rarely or not mentioned. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: The survey confirms disparate policies regarding the screening for and treatment of gestational diabetes. There are differences between Saxonia-Anhalt and Berlin. This can only be changed by appropriate inclusion in the German prenatal care plan.

AB - PURPOSE: The diagnosis and treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus is controversial. We undertook a survey of obstetricians/gynaecologists to identify current screening practices and differences between Saxonia-Anhalt and Berlin. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 267 practicing obstetricians/gynaecologists in Saxonia-Anhalt and 441 in Berlin. The questionnaires included items on the diagnosis and treatment of gestational diabetes. RESULTS: A response rate of 37 % in Saxonia-Anhalt and 35 % in Berlin was achieved. 90 % of the respondents would welcome the integration of a general screening for gestational diabetes into the standard German prenatal care plan. In spite of this great support only 37 % of the obstetricians/gynaecologists in Saxonia-Anhalt and 36 % in Berlin screened their patients generally. Important risk factors for the screening were rarely or not mentioned. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: The survey confirms disparate policies regarding the screening for and treatment of gestational diabetes. There are differences between Saxonia-Anhalt and Berlin. This can only be changed by appropriate inclusion in the German prenatal care plan.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 209

SP - 219

EP - 222

JO - Z GEBURTSH NEONATOL

JF - Z GEBURTSH NEONATOL

SN - 0948-2393

IS - 6

M1 - 6

ER -