Diagnosestellung und Diagnosecodierung von Demenzen im Spiegel der Abrechnungsdaten der gesetzlichen Krankenversicherung
Standard
Diagnosestellung und Diagnosecodierung von Demenzen im Spiegel der Abrechnungsdaten der gesetzlichen Krankenversicherung. / Kaduszkiewicz, Hanna; Wiese, Birgitt; Steinmann, Susanne; Schön, Gerhard; Hoffmann, Falk; van den Bussche, Hendrik.
in: PSYCHIAT PRAX, 23.09.2013.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnosestellung und Diagnosecodierung von Demenzen im Spiegel der Abrechnungsdaten der gesetzlichen Krankenversicherung
AU - Kaduszkiewicz, Hanna
AU - Wiese, Birgitt
AU - Steinmann, Susanne
AU - Schön, Gerhard
AU - Hoffmann, Falk
AU - van den Bussche, Hendrik
N1 - © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
PY - 2013/9/23
Y1 - 2013/9/23
N2 - Objective: On the basis of data from one German Sickness Fund we analyzed which medical discipline coded the incident diagnosis of dementia in ambulatory medical care in Germany, which type of dementia was coded and how the initial code eventually changed during the year of incidence.Methods: Claims data of 1,848 insured people aged ≥ 65 years in 2004 with incident dementia were analyzed by means of descriptive statistics.Results: The diagnosis within the first quarter of the incidence year was coded by the GP in 71 %, by a psychiatrist or neurologist in 14 %, by both in 6 % and by other disciplines in 9 % of the cases. The percentage of unspecified diagnoses was 62 % among GPs and 46 % among psychiatrists or neurologists, a number differing largely from epidemiological studies. In 27 % of the cases patients received two or more different dementia diagnoses during the incidence year.Conclusion: Studies and care concepts regarding dementia on the basis of diagnosis codes in ambulatory claims data should be interpreted with great caution.
AB - Objective: On the basis of data from one German Sickness Fund we analyzed which medical discipline coded the incident diagnosis of dementia in ambulatory medical care in Germany, which type of dementia was coded and how the initial code eventually changed during the year of incidence.Methods: Claims data of 1,848 insured people aged ≥ 65 years in 2004 with incident dementia were analyzed by means of descriptive statistics.Results: The diagnosis within the first quarter of the incidence year was coded by the GP in 71 %, by a psychiatrist or neurologist in 14 %, by both in 6 % and by other disciplines in 9 % of the cases. The percentage of unspecified diagnoses was 62 % among GPs and 46 % among psychiatrists or neurologists, a number differing largely from epidemiological studies. In 27 % of the cases patients received two or more different dementia diagnoses during the incidence year.Conclusion: Studies and care concepts regarding dementia on the basis of diagnosis codes in ambulatory claims data should be interpreted with great caution.
U2 - 10.1055/s-0033-1349505
DO - 10.1055/s-0033-1349505
M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
C2 - 24062153
JO - PSYCHIAT PRAX
JF - PSYCHIAT PRAX
SN - 0303-4259
ER -