Development and use of guideline-derived quality indicators for community lymphoedema

Standard

Development and use of guideline-derived quality indicators for community lymphoedema. / Herberger, K; Heyer, Kristina; Blome, C; Sandner, A; Altheide, F; Lader-Holtorf, M; Augustin, M.

in: J EUR ACAD DERMATOL, Jahrgang 27, Nr. 2, 2, 2013, S. 227-234.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{edbfd8f2477c4de7b9644c7aa5067423,
title = "Development and use of guideline-derived quality indicators for community lymphoedema",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Treatment of lymphoedema is complex and needs specific skills. There are no standards for the evaluation of quality of care.OBJECTIVE: Development and application of indicators for the measurement of quality of care in lymphoedema.METHODS: In a three-step process including a national Delphi expert consensus, quality indicators were derived from national and international guidelines. In a cross-sectional study involving a large spectrum of care providers, the quality of lymphoedema care in the community was assessed by transforming the indicators to one unweighted quality index (QI).RESULTS: A total of 12 quality indicators were identified and applied to n = 348 patients with lymphoedema and lipolymphoedema of any origin in the metropolitan area of Hamburg (90.8% female, mean age 57, SD 14.5 years). On average, 55% of the quality indicators were met, and 64.8% of the patients were satisfied with lymphoedema care. There was a significant correlation between QI and satisfaction.CONCLUSIONS: The quality indicators and the QI are feasible and valid for the evaluation of quality of care. They can support optimizing lymphoedema care.",
keywords = "Humans, Male, Aged, Female, Middle Aged, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), *Practice Guidelines as Topic, *Quality Indicators, Health Care, Lymphedema/*therapy, Humans, Male, Aged, Female, Middle Aged, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), *Practice Guidelines as Topic, *Quality Indicators, Health Care, Lymphedema/*therapy",
author = "K Herberger and Kristina Heyer and C Blome and A Sandner and F Altheide and M Lader-Holtorf and M Augustin",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2012 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology {\textcopyright} 2012 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04452.x",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "227--234",
journal = "J EUR ACAD DERMATOL",
issn = "0926-9959",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and use of guideline-derived quality indicators for community lymphoedema

AU - Herberger, K

AU - Heyer, Kristina

AU - Blome, C

AU - Sandner, A

AU - Altheide, F

AU - Lader-Holtorf, M

AU - Augustin, M

N1 - © 2012 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology © 2012 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - BACKGROUND: Treatment of lymphoedema is complex and needs specific skills. There are no standards for the evaluation of quality of care.OBJECTIVE: Development and application of indicators for the measurement of quality of care in lymphoedema.METHODS: In a three-step process including a national Delphi expert consensus, quality indicators were derived from national and international guidelines. In a cross-sectional study involving a large spectrum of care providers, the quality of lymphoedema care in the community was assessed by transforming the indicators to one unweighted quality index (QI).RESULTS: A total of 12 quality indicators were identified and applied to n = 348 patients with lymphoedema and lipolymphoedema of any origin in the metropolitan area of Hamburg (90.8% female, mean age 57, SD 14.5 years). On average, 55% of the quality indicators were met, and 64.8% of the patients were satisfied with lymphoedema care. There was a significant correlation between QI and satisfaction.CONCLUSIONS: The quality indicators and the QI are feasible and valid for the evaluation of quality of care. They can support optimizing lymphoedema care.

AB - BACKGROUND: Treatment of lymphoedema is complex and needs specific skills. There are no standards for the evaluation of quality of care.OBJECTIVE: Development and application of indicators for the measurement of quality of care in lymphoedema.METHODS: In a three-step process including a national Delphi expert consensus, quality indicators were derived from national and international guidelines. In a cross-sectional study involving a large spectrum of care providers, the quality of lymphoedema care in the community was assessed by transforming the indicators to one unweighted quality index (QI).RESULTS: A total of 12 quality indicators were identified and applied to n = 348 patients with lymphoedema and lipolymphoedema of any origin in the metropolitan area of Hamburg (90.8% female, mean age 57, SD 14.5 years). On average, 55% of the quality indicators were met, and 64.8% of the patients were satisfied with lymphoedema care. There was a significant correlation between QI and satisfaction.CONCLUSIONS: The quality indicators and the QI are feasible and valid for the evaluation of quality of care. They can support optimizing lymphoedema care.

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Aged

KW - Female

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

KW - Practice Guidelines as Topic

KW - Quality Indicators, Health Care

KW - Lymphedema/therapy

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Aged

KW - Female

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

KW - Practice Guidelines as Topic

KW - Quality Indicators, Health Care

KW - Lymphedema/therapy

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04452.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04452.x

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 22339808

VL - 27

SP - 227

EP - 234

JO - J EUR ACAD DERMATOL

JF - J EUR ACAD DERMATOL

SN - 0926-9959

IS - 2

M1 - 2

ER -