Depressed patients' perceptions of depression treatment decision-making.

Standard

Depressed patients' perceptions of depression treatment decision-making. / Simon, Daniela; Loh, Andreas; Wills, Celia E; Härter, Martin.

in: HEALTH EXPECT, Jahrgang 10, Nr. 1, 1, 2007, S. 62-74.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{59398a511f574a79993fd6d9cee947af,
title = "Depressed patients' perceptions of depression treatment decision-making.",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the feasibility and effects of patient-clinician shared decision-making (SDM) for depression treatment. Within a goal of informing the design of a SDM intervention, the objective of this study was to investigate depressed patients' perceptions of the treatment decision-making process with general practitioners (GPs). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Data were gathered from a convenience sample of 40 depressed patients to understand key aspects of treatment decision-making from the patient perspective. The sample varied in depression severity and type of setting in which treatment was sought. MAIN VARIABLES STUDIED: Semi-structured interview questions focused on patients' prior experiences with depression and treatment, perceptions of the treatment decision-making process, and needs and expectations about treatment. Current depression severity was also assessed. RESULTS: Patient lack of insight regarding depression severity substantially delayed patient engagement in treatment seeking and decision-making. Patients expected their GPs to be a first and main source of objective information and discussion about depression and treatment and to provide emotional support for decision-making. Patients also identified needs for additional information about depression and its treatment, as well as concerns about certain aspects of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The depression treatment context has some aspects that differ from treatment decision-making for other types of health conditions. SDM approaches for depression treatment should be adapted based on depression severity and patient-identified needs.",
author = "Daniela Simon and Andreas Loh and Wills, {Celia E} and Martin H{\"a}rter",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00424.x",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "10",
pages = "62--74",
journal = "HEALTH EXPECT",
issn = "1369-6513",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Depressed patients' perceptions of depression treatment decision-making.

AU - Simon, Daniela

AU - Loh, Andreas

AU - Wills, Celia E

AU - Härter, Martin

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the feasibility and effects of patient-clinician shared decision-making (SDM) for depression treatment. Within a goal of informing the design of a SDM intervention, the objective of this study was to investigate depressed patients' perceptions of the treatment decision-making process with general practitioners (GPs). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Data were gathered from a convenience sample of 40 depressed patients to understand key aspects of treatment decision-making from the patient perspective. The sample varied in depression severity and type of setting in which treatment was sought. MAIN VARIABLES STUDIED: Semi-structured interview questions focused on patients' prior experiences with depression and treatment, perceptions of the treatment decision-making process, and needs and expectations about treatment. Current depression severity was also assessed. RESULTS: Patient lack of insight regarding depression severity substantially delayed patient engagement in treatment seeking and decision-making. Patients expected their GPs to be a first and main source of objective information and discussion about depression and treatment and to provide emotional support for decision-making. Patients also identified needs for additional information about depression and its treatment, as well as concerns about certain aspects of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The depression treatment context has some aspects that differ from treatment decision-making for other types of health conditions. SDM approaches for depression treatment should be adapted based on depression severity and patient-identified needs.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the feasibility and effects of patient-clinician shared decision-making (SDM) for depression treatment. Within a goal of informing the design of a SDM intervention, the objective of this study was to investigate depressed patients' perceptions of the treatment decision-making process with general practitioners (GPs). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Data were gathered from a convenience sample of 40 depressed patients to understand key aspects of treatment decision-making from the patient perspective. The sample varied in depression severity and type of setting in which treatment was sought. MAIN VARIABLES STUDIED: Semi-structured interview questions focused on patients' prior experiences with depression and treatment, perceptions of the treatment decision-making process, and needs and expectations about treatment. Current depression severity was also assessed. RESULTS: Patient lack of insight regarding depression severity substantially delayed patient engagement in treatment seeking and decision-making. Patients expected their GPs to be a first and main source of objective information and discussion about depression and treatment and to provide emotional support for decision-making. Patients also identified needs for additional information about depression and its treatment, as well as concerns about certain aspects of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The depression treatment context has some aspects that differ from treatment decision-making for other types of health conditions. SDM approaches for depression treatment should be adapted based on depression severity and patient-identified needs.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00424.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00424.x

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 10

SP - 62

EP - 74

JO - HEALTH EXPECT

JF - HEALTH EXPECT

SN - 1369-6513

IS - 1

M1 - 1

ER -