Decision-related pupil dilation reflects upcoming choice and individual bias

Standard

Decision-related pupil dilation reflects upcoming choice and individual bias. / de Gee, Jan Willem; Knapen, Tomas; Donner, Tobias H.

in: P NATL ACAD SCI USA, Jahrgang 111, Nr. 5, 04.02.2014, S. E618-25.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{d4b1865a82fe4f14bbc569847568f626,
title = "Decision-related pupil dilation reflects upcoming choice and individual bias",
abstract = "A number of studies have shown that pupil size increases transiently during effortful decisions. These decision-related changes in pupil size are mediated by central neuromodulatory systems, which also influence the internal state of brain regions engaged in decision making. It has been proposed that pupil-linked neuromodulatory systems are activated by the termination of decision processes, and, consequently, that these systems primarily affect the postdecisional brain state. Here, we present pupil results that run contrary to this proposal, suggesting an important intradecisional role. We measured pupil size while subjects formed protracted decisions about the presence or absence ({"}yes{"} vs. {"}no{"}) of a visual contrast signal embedded in dynamic noise. Linear systems analysis revealed that the pupil was significantly driven by a sustained input throughout the course of the decision formation. This sustained component was larger than the transient component during the final choice (indicated by button press). The overall amplitude of pupil dilation during decision formation was bigger before yes than no choices, irrespective of the physical presence of the target signal. Remarkably, the magnitude of this pupil choice effect (yes > no) reflected the individual criterion: it was strongest in conservative subjects choosing yes against their bias. We conclude that the central neuromodulatory systems controlling pupil size are continuously engaged during decision formation in a way that reveals how the upcoming choice relates to the decision maker's attitude. Changes in brain state seem to interact with biased decision making in the face of uncertainty.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Adult, Behavior, Bias (Epidemiology), Choice Behavior, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Male, Pupil, Task Performance and Analysis, Time Factors, Young Adult, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't",
author = "{de Gee}, {Jan Willem} and Tomas Knapen and Donner, {Tobias H}",
year = "2014",
month = feb,
day = "4",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1317557111",
language = "English",
volume = "111",
pages = "E618--25",
journal = "P NATL ACAD SCI USA",
issn = "0027-8424",
publisher = "National Academy of Sciences",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Decision-related pupil dilation reflects upcoming choice and individual bias

AU - de Gee, Jan Willem

AU - Knapen, Tomas

AU - Donner, Tobias H

PY - 2014/2/4

Y1 - 2014/2/4

N2 - A number of studies have shown that pupil size increases transiently during effortful decisions. These decision-related changes in pupil size are mediated by central neuromodulatory systems, which also influence the internal state of brain regions engaged in decision making. It has been proposed that pupil-linked neuromodulatory systems are activated by the termination of decision processes, and, consequently, that these systems primarily affect the postdecisional brain state. Here, we present pupil results that run contrary to this proposal, suggesting an important intradecisional role. We measured pupil size while subjects formed protracted decisions about the presence or absence ("yes" vs. "no") of a visual contrast signal embedded in dynamic noise. Linear systems analysis revealed that the pupil was significantly driven by a sustained input throughout the course of the decision formation. This sustained component was larger than the transient component during the final choice (indicated by button press). The overall amplitude of pupil dilation during decision formation was bigger before yes than no choices, irrespective of the physical presence of the target signal. Remarkably, the magnitude of this pupil choice effect (yes > no) reflected the individual criterion: it was strongest in conservative subjects choosing yes against their bias. We conclude that the central neuromodulatory systems controlling pupil size are continuously engaged during decision formation in a way that reveals how the upcoming choice relates to the decision maker's attitude. Changes in brain state seem to interact with biased decision making in the face of uncertainty.

AB - A number of studies have shown that pupil size increases transiently during effortful decisions. These decision-related changes in pupil size are mediated by central neuromodulatory systems, which also influence the internal state of brain regions engaged in decision making. It has been proposed that pupil-linked neuromodulatory systems are activated by the termination of decision processes, and, consequently, that these systems primarily affect the postdecisional brain state. Here, we present pupil results that run contrary to this proposal, suggesting an important intradecisional role. We measured pupil size while subjects formed protracted decisions about the presence or absence ("yes" vs. "no") of a visual contrast signal embedded in dynamic noise. Linear systems analysis revealed that the pupil was significantly driven by a sustained input throughout the course of the decision formation. This sustained component was larger than the transient component during the final choice (indicated by button press). The overall amplitude of pupil dilation during decision formation was bigger before yes than no choices, irrespective of the physical presence of the target signal. Remarkably, the magnitude of this pupil choice effect (yes > no) reflected the individual criterion: it was strongest in conservative subjects choosing yes against their bias. We conclude that the central neuromodulatory systems controlling pupil size are continuously engaged during decision formation in a way that reveals how the upcoming choice relates to the decision maker's attitude. Changes in brain state seem to interact with biased decision making in the face of uncertainty.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Adult

KW - Behavior

KW - Bias (Epidemiology)

KW - Choice Behavior

KW - Decision Making

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Pupil

KW - Task Performance and Analysis

KW - Time Factors

KW - Young Adult

KW - Journal Article

KW - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1317557111

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1317557111

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 24449874

VL - 111

SP - E618-25

JO - P NATL ACAD SCI USA

JF - P NATL ACAD SCI USA

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 5

ER -