Currently used criteria for active surveillance in men with low-risk prostate cancer: an analysis of pathologic features.

Standard

Currently used criteria for active surveillance in men with low-risk prostate cancer: an analysis of pathologic features. / Nazareno, Suardi; Capitanio, Umberto; Chun, Felix; Graefen, Markus; Perrotte, Paul; Schlomm, Thorsten; Haese, Alexander; Huland, Hartwig; Erbersdobler, Andreas; Montorsi, Francesco; Karakiewicz, Pierre I.

in: CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, Jahrgang 113, Nr. 8, 8, 2008, S. 2068-2072.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Nazareno, S, Capitanio, U, Chun, F, Graefen, M, Perrotte, P, Schlomm, T, Haese, A, Huland, H, Erbersdobler, A, Montorsi, F & Karakiewicz, PI 2008, 'Currently used criteria for active surveillance in men with low-risk prostate cancer: an analysis of pathologic features.', CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, Jg. 113, Nr. 8, 8, S. 2068-2072. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18792067?dopt=Citation>

APA

Nazareno, S., Capitanio, U., Chun, F., Graefen, M., Perrotte, P., Schlomm, T., Haese, A., Huland, H., Erbersdobler, A., Montorsi, F., & Karakiewicz, P. I. (2008). Currently used criteria for active surveillance in men with low-risk prostate cancer: an analysis of pathologic features. CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, 113(8), 2068-2072. [8]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18792067?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Nazareno S, Capitanio U, Chun F, Graefen M, Perrotte P, Schlomm T et al. Currently used criteria for active surveillance in men with low-risk prostate cancer: an analysis of pathologic features. CANCER-AM CANCER SOC. 2008;113(8):2068-2072. 8.

Bibtex

@article{4e019d00c83a45ecb9743679cf45e573,
title = "Currently used criteria for active surveillance in men with low-risk prostate cancer: an analysis of pathologic features.",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Active surveillance (AS) represents a treatment option for select patients with low-risk, organ-confined prostate cancer (PCa). In this report, the authors addressed the rates of misclassification associated with the use of 5 different clinical criteria for AS. Misclassification was defined as the presence of either nonorgan-confined disease or high-grade PCa. METHODS: Between 1992 and 2007, 4885 patients underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) at 1 of 2 European academic centers, and the patients were identified who fulfilled the criteria for AS according to 5 different investigational groups (Hardie et al, Roemeling et al, Choo et al, Klotz, and D'Amico and Coleman). Statistics targeted the rates of misclassification for each of the 5 definitions. RESULTS: Four thousand three hundred eight patients, 4047 patients, 3993 patients, 2455 patients, and 2345 patients fulfilled the AS criteria of Hardie et al, Roemeling et al, Choo et al, Klotz, and D'Amico and Coleman, respectively. Extracapsular extension was reported in 13.5% to 26% of patients, and seminal vesicle invasion was reported in 2.9% to 8.2% of patients. When PCa with Gleason scores from 8 to 10 at RP was considered high grade, the misclassification rates were 27%, 25%, 25%, 15%, and 14% for the 5 studies, respectively. Conversely, when PCa with Gleason scores from 7 to 10 was considered high grade, the misclassification rates increased to 56%, 55%, 45%, 42%, and 39%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The currently available AS criteria are limited by a high rate of misclassification. The use of more selective AS criteria may reduce the rate of misclassification but also may reduce significantly the percentage of patients who may be considered for AS.",
author = "Suardi Nazareno and Umberto Capitanio and Felix Chun and Markus Graefen and Paul Perrotte and Thorsten Schlomm and Alexander Haese and Hartwig Huland and Andreas Erbersdobler and Francesco Montorsi and Karakiewicz, {Pierre I}",
year = "2008",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "113",
pages = "2068--2072",
journal = "CANCER-AM CANCER SOC",
issn = "0008-543X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Currently used criteria for active surveillance in men with low-risk prostate cancer: an analysis of pathologic features.

AU - Nazareno, Suardi

AU - Capitanio, Umberto

AU - Chun, Felix

AU - Graefen, Markus

AU - Perrotte, Paul

AU - Schlomm, Thorsten

AU - Haese, Alexander

AU - Huland, Hartwig

AU - Erbersdobler, Andreas

AU - Montorsi, Francesco

AU - Karakiewicz, Pierre I

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - BACKGROUND: Active surveillance (AS) represents a treatment option for select patients with low-risk, organ-confined prostate cancer (PCa). In this report, the authors addressed the rates of misclassification associated with the use of 5 different clinical criteria for AS. Misclassification was defined as the presence of either nonorgan-confined disease or high-grade PCa. METHODS: Between 1992 and 2007, 4885 patients underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) at 1 of 2 European academic centers, and the patients were identified who fulfilled the criteria for AS according to 5 different investigational groups (Hardie et al, Roemeling et al, Choo et al, Klotz, and D'Amico and Coleman). Statistics targeted the rates of misclassification for each of the 5 definitions. RESULTS: Four thousand three hundred eight patients, 4047 patients, 3993 patients, 2455 patients, and 2345 patients fulfilled the AS criteria of Hardie et al, Roemeling et al, Choo et al, Klotz, and D'Amico and Coleman, respectively. Extracapsular extension was reported in 13.5% to 26% of patients, and seminal vesicle invasion was reported in 2.9% to 8.2% of patients. When PCa with Gleason scores from 8 to 10 at RP was considered high grade, the misclassification rates were 27%, 25%, 25%, 15%, and 14% for the 5 studies, respectively. Conversely, when PCa with Gleason scores from 7 to 10 was considered high grade, the misclassification rates increased to 56%, 55%, 45%, 42%, and 39%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The currently available AS criteria are limited by a high rate of misclassification. The use of more selective AS criteria may reduce the rate of misclassification but also may reduce significantly the percentage of patients who may be considered for AS.

AB - BACKGROUND: Active surveillance (AS) represents a treatment option for select patients with low-risk, organ-confined prostate cancer (PCa). In this report, the authors addressed the rates of misclassification associated with the use of 5 different clinical criteria for AS. Misclassification was defined as the presence of either nonorgan-confined disease or high-grade PCa. METHODS: Between 1992 and 2007, 4885 patients underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) at 1 of 2 European academic centers, and the patients were identified who fulfilled the criteria for AS according to 5 different investigational groups (Hardie et al, Roemeling et al, Choo et al, Klotz, and D'Amico and Coleman). Statistics targeted the rates of misclassification for each of the 5 definitions. RESULTS: Four thousand three hundred eight patients, 4047 patients, 3993 patients, 2455 patients, and 2345 patients fulfilled the AS criteria of Hardie et al, Roemeling et al, Choo et al, Klotz, and D'Amico and Coleman, respectively. Extracapsular extension was reported in 13.5% to 26% of patients, and seminal vesicle invasion was reported in 2.9% to 8.2% of patients. When PCa with Gleason scores from 8 to 10 at RP was considered high grade, the misclassification rates were 27%, 25%, 25%, 15%, and 14% for the 5 studies, respectively. Conversely, when PCa with Gleason scores from 7 to 10 was considered high grade, the misclassification rates increased to 56%, 55%, 45%, 42%, and 39%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The currently available AS criteria are limited by a high rate of misclassification. The use of more selective AS criteria may reduce the rate of misclassification but also may reduce significantly the percentage of patients who may be considered for AS.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 113

SP - 2068

EP - 2072

JO - CANCER-AM CANCER SOC

JF - CANCER-AM CANCER SOC

SN - 0008-543X

IS - 8

M1 - 8

ER -