Current guidelines poorly address multimorbidity: pilot of the interaction matrix method

Standard

Current guidelines poorly address multimorbidity: pilot of the interaction matrix method. / Muth, Christiane; Kirchner, Hanna; van den Akker, Marjan; Scherer, Martin; Glasziou, Paul P.

in: J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, Jahrgang 67, Nr. 11, 01.11.2014, S. 1242-50.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{10bdded495a443ff96db990910405be7,
title = "Current guidelines poorly address multimorbidity: pilot of the interaction matrix method",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To develop a framework to identify and classify interactions within and among treatments and conditions and to test this framework with guidelines on chronic heart failure (CHF) and its frequent comorbidity.STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Text analysis of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on CHF and 18 conditions co-occurring in ≥5% of CHF patients (2-4 guidelines per disease). We extracted data on interactions between CHF and comorbidity and key recommendations on diagnostic and therapeutic management. From a subset of data, we derived 13 subcategories within disease-disease (Di-Di-I), disease-drug (Di-D-I), drug-drug interactions (DDI) and synergistic treatments. We classified the interactions and tested the interrater reliability, refined the framework, and agreed on the matrix of interactions.RESULTS: We included 48 guidelines; two-thirds provided information about comorbidity. In total, we identified N = 247 interactions (on average, 14 per comorbidity): 68 were Di-Di-I, 115 were Di-D-I, 12 were DDI, and 52 were synergisms. All 18 comorbidities contributed at least one interaction.CONCLUSION: The interaction matrix provides a structure to present different types of interactions between an index disease and comorbidity. Guideline developers may consider the matrix to support clinical decision making in multimorbidity. Further research is needed to show its relevance to improve guidelines and health outcomes.",
keywords = "Chronic Disease, Comorbidity, Decision Making, Disease Management, Drug Interactions, Heart Failure, Humans, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Reproducibility of Results",
author = "Christiane Muth and Hanna Kirchner and {van den Akker}, Marjan and Martin Scherer and Glasziou, {Paul P}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2014",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.07.004",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "1242--50",
journal = "J CLIN EPIDEMIOL",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current guidelines poorly address multimorbidity: pilot of the interaction matrix method

AU - Muth, Christiane

AU - Kirchner, Hanna

AU - van den Akker, Marjan

AU - Scherer, Martin

AU - Glasziou, Paul P

N1 - Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2014/11/1

Y1 - 2014/11/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To develop a framework to identify and classify interactions within and among treatments and conditions and to test this framework with guidelines on chronic heart failure (CHF) and its frequent comorbidity.STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Text analysis of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on CHF and 18 conditions co-occurring in ≥5% of CHF patients (2-4 guidelines per disease). We extracted data on interactions between CHF and comorbidity and key recommendations on diagnostic and therapeutic management. From a subset of data, we derived 13 subcategories within disease-disease (Di-Di-I), disease-drug (Di-D-I), drug-drug interactions (DDI) and synergistic treatments. We classified the interactions and tested the interrater reliability, refined the framework, and agreed on the matrix of interactions.RESULTS: We included 48 guidelines; two-thirds provided information about comorbidity. In total, we identified N = 247 interactions (on average, 14 per comorbidity): 68 were Di-Di-I, 115 were Di-D-I, 12 were DDI, and 52 were synergisms. All 18 comorbidities contributed at least one interaction.CONCLUSION: The interaction matrix provides a structure to present different types of interactions between an index disease and comorbidity. Guideline developers may consider the matrix to support clinical decision making in multimorbidity. Further research is needed to show its relevance to improve guidelines and health outcomes.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To develop a framework to identify and classify interactions within and among treatments and conditions and to test this framework with guidelines on chronic heart failure (CHF) and its frequent comorbidity.STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Text analysis of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on CHF and 18 conditions co-occurring in ≥5% of CHF patients (2-4 guidelines per disease). We extracted data on interactions between CHF and comorbidity and key recommendations on diagnostic and therapeutic management. From a subset of data, we derived 13 subcategories within disease-disease (Di-Di-I), disease-drug (Di-D-I), drug-drug interactions (DDI) and synergistic treatments. We classified the interactions and tested the interrater reliability, refined the framework, and agreed on the matrix of interactions.RESULTS: We included 48 guidelines; two-thirds provided information about comorbidity. In total, we identified N = 247 interactions (on average, 14 per comorbidity): 68 were Di-Di-I, 115 were Di-D-I, 12 were DDI, and 52 were synergisms. All 18 comorbidities contributed at least one interaction.CONCLUSION: The interaction matrix provides a structure to present different types of interactions between an index disease and comorbidity. Guideline developers may consider the matrix to support clinical decision making in multimorbidity. Further research is needed to show its relevance to improve guidelines and health outcomes.

KW - Chronic Disease

KW - Comorbidity

KW - Decision Making

KW - Disease Management

KW - Drug Interactions

KW - Heart Failure

KW - Humans

KW - Practice Guidelines as Topic

KW - Reproducibility of Results

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.07.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.07.004

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 25216898

VL - 67

SP - 1242

EP - 1250

JO - J CLIN EPIDEMIOL

JF - J CLIN EPIDEMIOL

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 11

ER -