CT-guided blocks and neuroablation of the ganglion impar (Walther) in perineal pain: anatomy, technique, safety, and efficacy.

Standard

CT-guided blocks and neuroablation of the ganglion impar (Walther) in perineal pain: anatomy, technique, safety, and efficacy. / Agarwal-Kozlowski, Kamayni; Lorke, Dietrich; Habermann, Christian; Esch, Am; Schulte, Jochen; Beck, Helge.

in: CLIN J PAIN, Jahrgang 25, Nr. 7, 7, 2009, S. 570-576.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Agarwal-Kozlowski K, Lorke D, Habermann C, Esch A, Schulte J, Beck H. CT-guided blocks and neuroablation of the ganglion impar (Walther) in perineal pain: anatomy, technique, safety, and efficacy. CLIN J PAIN. 2009;25(7):570-576. 7.

Bibtex

@article{e293a5a5f7eb4cb1908d0948c1980f2b,
title = "CT-guided blocks and neuroablation of the ganglion impar (Walther) in perineal pain: anatomy, technique, safety, and efficacy.",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: An alternate approach to the ganglion impar was chosen to minimize the risk of adverse events. Efficacy of the procedure was evaluated. METHODS: Charts and computed tomography (CT)-scans of patients who underwent block and neuroablation of the ganglion impar (Walther) between 2003 and 2007 were systematically reviewed with respect to adverse events and efficacy by rating pain intensity. A total of 76 blocks were performed, 48 of them being diagnostic blocks and 28 neuroablations. Chemical destruction was performed with ethanol, if pain recurred despite injection of local anesthetic. RESULTS: Interventional pain therapy was performed in 43 patients (age: 64.6+/-12.4 y, median 49.5 y, range: 36 to 86 y, male/female: 27/16) presenting with perineal pain of unknown origin (n=15), carcinoma of the prostate (n=8), colorectal carcinoma (n=7), postsurgery of thrombosis of perineal veins (n=3), postherpetic neuralgia (n=4), malformation of the spinal cord (n=2), vaginal protrusion (n=2), failed back surgery syndrome (n=1), and ablation of testis (n=1). CT-guided puncture was not associated with any adverse events and resulted in a reduction of numeric rating scale values from 8.2+/-1.6 to 2.2+/-1.6 (P",
author = "Kamayni Agarwal-Kozlowski and Dietrich Lorke and Christian Habermann and Am Esch and Jochen Schulte and Helge Beck",
year = "2009",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "25",
pages = "570--576",
journal = "CLIN J PAIN",
issn = "0749-8047",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - CT-guided blocks and neuroablation of the ganglion impar (Walther) in perineal pain: anatomy, technique, safety, and efficacy.

AU - Agarwal-Kozlowski, Kamayni

AU - Lorke, Dietrich

AU - Habermann, Christian

AU - Esch, Am

AU - Schulte, Jochen

AU - Beck, Helge

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - OBJECTIVE: An alternate approach to the ganglion impar was chosen to minimize the risk of adverse events. Efficacy of the procedure was evaluated. METHODS: Charts and computed tomography (CT)-scans of patients who underwent block and neuroablation of the ganglion impar (Walther) between 2003 and 2007 were systematically reviewed with respect to adverse events and efficacy by rating pain intensity. A total of 76 blocks were performed, 48 of them being diagnostic blocks and 28 neuroablations. Chemical destruction was performed with ethanol, if pain recurred despite injection of local anesthetic. RESULTS: Interventional pain therapy was performed in 43 patients (age: 64.6+/-12.4 y, median 49.5 y, range: 36 to 86 y, male/female: 27/16) presenting with perineal pain of unknown origin (n=15), carcinoma of the prostate (n=8), colorectal carcinoma (n=7), postsurgery of thrombosis of perineal veins (n=3), postherpetic neuralgia (n=4), malformation of the spinal cord (n=2), vaginal protrusion (n=2), failed back surgery syndrome (n=1), and ablation of testis (n=1). CT-guided puncture was not associated with any adverse events and resulted in a reduction of numeric rating scale values from 8.2+/-1.6 to 2.2+/-1.6 (P

AB - OBJECTIVE: An alternate approach to the ganglion impar was chosen to minimize the risk of adverse events. Efficacy of the procedure was evaluated. METHODS: Charts and computed tomography (CT)-scans of patients who underwent block and neuroablation of the ganglion impar (Walther) between 2003 and 2007 were systematically reviewed with respect to adverse events and efficacy by rating pain intensity. A total of 76 blocks were performed, 48 of them being diagnostic blocks and 28 neuroablations. Chemical destruction was performed with ethanol, if pain recurred despite injection of local anesthetic. RESULTS: Interventional pain therapy was performed in 43 patients (age: 64.6+/-12.4 y, median 49.5 y, range: 36 to 86 y, male/female: 27/16) presenting with perineal pain of unknown origin (n=15), carcinoma of the prostate (n=8), colorectal carcinoma (n=7), postsurgery of thrombosis of perineal veins (n=3), postherpetic neuralgia (n=4), malformation of the spinal cord (n=2), vaginal protrusion (n=2), failed back surgery syndrome (n=1), and ablation of testis (n=1). CT-guided puncture was not associated with any adverse events and resulted in a reduction of numeric rating scale values from 8.2+/-1.6 to 2.2+/-1.6 (P

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 25

SP - 570

EP - 576

JO - CLIN J PAIN

JF - CLIN J PAIN

SN - 0749-8047

IS - 7

M1 - 7

ER -