PortalPublikationenCritical comments to a recent EFLM recommendation for the re...

Critical comments to a recent EFLM recommendation for the review of reference intervals

Standard

Critical comments to a recent EFLM recommendation for the review of reference intervals. / Haeckel, Rainer; Wosniok, Werner; Arzideh, Farhad; Zierk, Jakob; Gurr, Eberhard; Streichert, Thomas.

in: CLIN CHEM LAB MED, Jahrgang 55, Nr. 3, 01.03.2017, S. 341-347.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Review › Forschung

Harvard

Haeckel, R, Wosniok, W, Arzideh, F, Zierk, J, Gurr, E & Streichert, T 2017, 'Critical comments to a recent EFLM recommendation for the review of reference intervals', CLIN CHEM LAB MED, Jg. 55, Nr. 3, S. 341-347. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2016-1112

APA

Haeckel, R., Wosniok, W., Arzideh, F., Zierk, J., Gurr, E., & Streichert, T. (2017). Critical comments to a recent EFLM recommendation for the review of reference intervals. CLIN CHEM LAB MED, 55(3), 341-347. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2016-1112

Vancouver

Haeckel R, Wosniok W, Arzideh F, Zierk J, Gurr E, Streichert T. Critical comments to a recent EFLM recommendation for the review of reference intervals. CLIN CHEM LAB MED. 2017 Mär 1;55(3):341-347. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2016-1112

Bibtex

@article{88f7d4e6a3cc4f1885ac5b6c77f0fe06,
title = "Critical comments to a recent EFLM recommendation for the review of reference intervals",
abstract = "In a recent EFLM recommendation on reference intervals by Henny et al., the direct approach for determining reference intervals was proposed as the only presently accepted {"}gold{"} standard. Some essential drawbacks of the direct approach were not sufficiently emphasized, such as unacceptably wide confidence limits due to the limited number of observations claimed and the practical usability for only a limited age range. Indirect procedures avoid these disadvantages of the direct approach. Furthermore, indirect approaches are well suited for reference limits with large variations during lifetime and for common reference limits.",
keywords = "Age Factors, Clinical Chemistry Tests, Europe, Humans, Medical Laboratory Science, Reference Standards, Reference Values, Journal Article, Review",
author = "Rainer Haeckel and Werner Wosniok and Farhad Arzideh and Jakob Zierk and Eberhard Gurr and Thomas Streichert",
year = "2017",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1515/cclm-2016-1112",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "341--347",
journal = "CLIN CHEM LAB MED",
issn = "1434-6621",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Critical comments to a recent EFLM recommendation for the review of reference intervals

AU - Haeckel, Rainer

AU - Wosniok, Werner

AU - Arzideh, Farhad

AU - Zierk, Jakob

AU - Gurr, Eberhard

AU - Streichert, Thomas

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - In a recent EFLM recommendation on reference intervals by Henny et al., the direct approach for determining reference intervals was proposed as the only presently accepted "gold" standard. Some essential drawbacks of the direct approach were not sufficiently emphasized, such as unacceptably wide confidence limits due to the limited number of observations claimed and the practical usability for only a limited age range. Indirect procedures avoid these disadvantages of the direct approach. Furthermore, indirect approaches are well suited for reference limits with large variations during lifetime and for common reference limits.

AB - In a recent EFLM recommendation on reference intervals by Henny et al., the direct approach for determining reference intervals was proposed as the only presently accepted "gold" standard. Some essential drawbacks of the direct approach were not sufficiently emphasized, such as unacceptably wide confidence limits due to the limited number of observations claimed and the practical usability for only a limited age range. Indirect procedures avoid these disadvantages of the direct approach. Furthermore, indirect approaches are well suited for reference limits with large variations during lifetime and for common reference limits.

KW - Age Factors

KW - Clinical Chemistry Tests

KW - Europe

KW - Humans

KW - Medical Laboratory Science

KW - Reference Standards

KW - Reference Values

KW - Journal Article

KW - Review

U2 - 10.1515/cclm-2016-1112

DO - 10.1515/cclm-2016-1112

M3 - SCORING: Review article

C2 - 28151722

VL - 55

SP - 341

EP - 347

JO - CLIN CHEM LAB MED

JF - CLIN CHEM LAB MED

SN - 1434-6621

IS - 3

ER -