[Criteria for the development and evaluation of decision aids]
Standard
[Criteria for the development and evaluation of decision aids]. / Kasper, Jürgen; Lenz, Matthias.
in: Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich, Jahrgang 99, Nr. 6, 6, 2005, S. 359-365.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - [Criteria for the development and evaluation of decision aids]
AU - Kasper, Jürgen
AU - Lenz, Matthias
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - Decision aids (DA) are interventions designed to support individuals in making specific and deliberate health- or illness-related choices. The assessment of the quality of DAs is presently under discussion. On the basis of a systematic literature review, this article provides a survey of methods and open questions in quality assessment of DAs. Quality assessment of DAs is presently limited to the evidence of efficacy through controlled trials based on single-outcome measures. However, since DAs are multicomponent interventions, single-outcome trials are insufficient for complete quality assessment; also, it is difficult to identify the causes for the adequacy or inadequacy of a particular DA. The present analysis identified an elaborated and systematic guide to evaluate DAs. On the basis of this instrument, we propose a novel instrument which is aimed at disclosing the complex relation between background theory, methods, and aims of a DA. The proposed instrument is still under development and has to be evaluated in validation studies.
AB - Decision aids (DA) are interventions designed to support individuals in making specific and deliberate health- or illness-related choices. The assessment of the quality of DAs is presently under discussion. On the basis of a systematic literature review, this article provides a survey of methods and open questions in quality assessment of DAs. Quality assessment of DAs is presently limited to the evidence of efficacy through controlled trials based on single-outcome measures. However, since DAs are multicomponent interventions, single-outcome trials are insufficient for complete quality assessment; also, it is difficult to identify the causes for the adequacy or inadequacy of a particular DA. The present analysis identified an elaborated and systematic guide to evaluate DAs. On the basis of this instrument, we propose a novel instrument which is aimed at disclosing the complex relation between background theory, methods, and aims of a DA. The proposed instrument is still under development and has to be evaluated in validation studies.
M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
VL - 99
SP - 359
EP - 365
IS - 6
M1 - 6
ER -
