Cost Comparison of Surgical Clipping and Endovascular Coiling of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms - A Systematic Review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cost Comparison of Surgical Clipping and Endovascular Coiling of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms - A Systematic Review

AU - Engele, Tobias

AU - Brettschneider, Christian

AU - Emami, Pedram

AU - König, Hans-Helmut

N1 - Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.

PY - 2019/5

Y1 - 2019/5

N2 - OBJECTIVES: Rupture of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) is the main cause for subarachnoid hemorrhage. UIA are widespread among the population. Advanced technology enables us to diagnose UIAs with increasing reliability and subsequently treat them. There are 2 main treatment options: surgical clipping and endovascular treatment of the aneurysm. This article aims to analyze costs of neurosurgical clipping and the endovascular approach to treat UIA, and to give an overview over the existing literature.METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using the databases Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, and NHS EED. Articles were divided into 2 groups based on the perspective from which costs were evaluated (health care provider or payer). Costs were inflated to the year 2015 and converted to international dollars.RESULTS: The literature search yielded 137 different articles out of which 15 have been considered relevant and have been included in this review. Not only absolute numbers but also the cost ratio of both treatment modalities showed substantial variations. The coiling procedure tends to be more expensive for health care providers but cheaper for cost bearers. Without any exception, the authors determined shorter lengths of stay for patients who underwent the coiling procedure.CONCLUSIONS: Due to different definitions of hospital costs and hardly reproducible calculations, comparability of the stated numbers is limited. Besides the economic impact, outcomes must be considered when making a treatment decision. The 2 treatment modalities are not equally suitable in every patient nor for every aneurysm location.

AB - OBJECTIVES: Rupture of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) is the main cause for subarachnoid hemorrhage. UIA are widespread among the population. Advanced technology enables us to diagnose UIAs with increasing reliability and subsequently treat them. There are 2 main treatment options: surgical clipping and endovascular treatment of the aneurysm. This article aims to analyze costs of neurosurgical clipping and the endovascular approach to treat UIA, and to give an overview over the existing literature.METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using the databases Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, and NHS EED. Articles were divided into 2 groups based on the perspective from which costs were evaluated (health care provider or payer). Costs were inflated to the year 2015 and converted to international dollars.RESULTS: The literature search yielded 137 different articles out of which 15 have been considered relevant and have been included in this review. Not only absolute numbers but also the cost ratio of both treatment modalities showed substantial variations. The coiling procedure tends to be more expensive for health care providers but cheaper for cost bearers. Without any exception, the authors determined shorter lengths of stay for patients who underwent the coiling procedure.CONCLUSIONS: Due to different definitions of hospital costs and hardly reproducible calculations, comparability of the stated numbers is limited. Besides the economic impact, outcomes must be considered when making a treatment decision. The 2 treatment modalities are not equally suitable in every patient nor for every aneurysm location.

KW - Journal Article

KW - Review

U2 - 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.195

DO - 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.195

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 30743038

VL - 125

SP - 461

EP - 468

JO - WORLD NEUROSURG

JF - WORLD NEUROSURG

SN - 1878-8750

ER -