Contemporary Assessment of Long-Term Survival Rates in Patients With Stage I Nonseminoma Germ-Cell Tumor of the Testis

Standard

Contemporary Assessment of Long-Term Survival Rates in Patients With Stage I Nonseminoma Germ-Cell Tumor of the Testis : Population-Based Comparison Between Surveillance and Active Treatment After Initial Orchiectomy. / Mazzone, Elio; Mistretta, Francesco A; Knipper, Sophie; Tian, Zhe; Palumbo, Carlotta; Gandaglia, Giorgio; Soulieres, Denis; Tilki, Derya; Montorsi, Francesco; Shariat, Shahrokh F; Saad, Fred; Briganti, Alberto; Karakiewicz, Pierre I.

in: CLIN GENITOURIN CANC, Jahrgang 17, Nr. 6, 12.2019, S. e1153-e1162.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Mazzone, E, Mistretta, FA, Knipper, S, Tian, Z, Palumbo, C, Gandaglia, G, Soulieres, D, Tilki, D, Montorsi, F, Shariat, SF, Saad, F, Briganti, A & Karakiewicz, PI 2019, 'Contemporary Assessment of Long-Term Survival Rates in Patients With Stage I Nonseminoma Germ-Cell Tumor of the Testis: Population-Based Comparison Between Surveillance and Active Treatment After Initial Orchiectomy', CLIN GENITOURIN CANC, Jg. 17, Nr. 6, S. e1153-e1162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2019.08.009

APA

Mazzone, E., Mistretta, F. A., Knipper, S., Tian, Z., Palumbo, C., Gandaglia, G., Soulieres, D., Tilki, D., Montorsi, F., Shariat, S. F., Saad, F., Briganti, A., & Karakiewicz, P. I. (2019). Contemporary Assessment of Long-Term Survival Rates in Patients With Stage I Nonseminoma Germ-Cell Tumor of the Testis: Population-Based Comparison Between Surveillance and Active Treatment After Initial Orchiectomy. CLIN GENITOURIN CANC, 17(6), e1153-e1162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2019.08.009

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{69fe29f3f764402ca9c9f0ba3121cd24,
title = "Contemporary Assessment of Long-Term Survival Rates in Patients With Stage I Nonseminoma Germ-Cell Tumor of the Testis: Population-Based Comparison Between Surveillance and Active Treatment After Initial Orchiectomy",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Historical data demonstrated similar survival outcomes in patients with stage I nonseminoma germ-cell tumor of the testis (NSGCTT) subjected to either surveillance or active treatment (AT) after orchiectomy. However, data with long-term follow-up are unavailable. We tested contemporary treatment rates and their effect on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and other-cause mortality (OCM) relative to surveillance, as well as after stratification between chemotherapy (CHT) versus retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND).PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified patients with stage I NSGCTT with initial orchiectomy within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1988-2015). Subsequent surveillance versus CHT versus RPLND use rates were reported. Cumulative incidence plots and multivariable competing-risks regression (CRR) models were used after propensity score (PS) matching. These tests first compared surveillance versus AT (CHT vs. RPLND) and subsequently CHT versus RPLND.RESULTS: Of 5034 patients with stage I NSGCTT, 61.2%, 24.9%, and 13.9%, respectively, underwent surveillance, CHT, and RPLND. Between 1988 and 2015, surveillance (estimated annual percentage change [EAPC]: +1.1%, P < .001) and CHT (EAPC: +2.3%, P < .001) rates increased. RPLND rates decreased (EAPC: -5.7%; P < .001). After PS matching, CRR models failed to identify AT as an independent predictor of lower mortality relative to surveillance. However, after PS matching, CRR models identified RPLND as an independent predictor of lower CSM (hazard ratio, 0.26; P = .002) relative to CHT. No difference in OCM rates was recorded (hazard ratio, 1.25; P = .2).CONCLUSION: Surveillance and CHT use rates increased while RPLND decreased in the last two decades. Virtually the same outcomes were recorded between surveillance and AT. However, within AT, RPLND was associated with lower CSM than CHT.",
keywords = "Adult, Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/statistics & numerical data, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Lymph Node Excision/statistics & numerical data, Male, Neoplasm Staging, Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/mortality, Orchiectomy, Propensity Score, Retroperitoneal Space/surgery, Retrospective Studies, Risk Assessment, SEER Program/statistics & numerical data, Survival Rate, Testicular Neoplasms/mortality, Testis/pathology, United States/epidemiology, Watchful Waiting/statistics & numerical data, Young Adult",
author = "Elio Mazzone and Mistretta, {Francesco A} and Sophie Knipper and Zhe Tian and Carlotta Palumbo and Giorgio Gandaglia and Denis Soulieres and Derya Tilki and Francesco Montorsi and Shariat, {Shahrokh F} and Fred Saad and Alberto Briganti and Karakiewicz, {Pierre I}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2019",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1016/j.clgc.2019.08.009",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "e1153--e1162",
journal = "CLIN GENITOURIN CANC",
issn = "1558-7673",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contemporary Assessment of Long-Term Survival Rates in Patients With Stage I Nonseminoma Germ-Cell Tumor of the Testis

T2 - Population-Based Comparison Between Surveillance and Active Treatment After Initial Orchiectomy

AU - Mazzone, Elio

AU - Mistretta, Francesco A

AU - Knipper, Sophie

AU - Tian, Zhe

AU - Palumbo, Carlotta

AU - Gandaglia, Giorgio

AU - Soulieres, Denis

AU - Tilki, Derya

AU - Montorsi, Francesco

AU - Shariat, Shahrokh F

AU - Saad, Fred

AU - Briganti, Alberto

AU - Karakiewicz, Pierre I

N1 - Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2019/12

Y1 - 2019/12

N2 - BACKGROUND: Historical data demonstrated similar survival outcomes in patients with stage I nonseminoma germ-cell tumor of the testis (NSGCTT) subjected to either surveillance or active treatment (AT) after orchiectomy. However, data with long-term follow-up are unavailable. We tested contemporary treatment rates and their effect on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and other-cause mortality (OCM) relative to surveillance, as well as after stratification between chemotherapy (CHT) versus retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND).PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified patients with stage I NSGCTT with initial orchiectomy within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1988-2015). Subsequent surveillance versus CHT versus RPLND use rates were reported. Cumulative incidence plots and multivariable competing-risks regression (CRR) models were used after propensity score (PS) matching. These tests first compared surveillance versus AT (CHT vs. RPLND) and subsequently CHT versus RPLND.RESULTS: Of 5034 patients with stage I NSGCTT, 61.2%, 24.9%, and 13.9%, respectively, underwent surveillance, CHT, and RPLND. Between 1988 and 2015, surveillance (estimated annual percentage change [EAPC]: +1.1%, P < .001) and CHT (EAPC: +2.3%, P < .001) rates increased. RPLND rates decreased (EAPC: -5.7%; P < .001). After PS matching, CRR models failed to identify AT as an independent predictor of lower mortality relative to surveillance. However, after PS matching, CRR models identified RPLND as an independent predictor of lower CSM (hazard ratio, 0.26; P = .002) relative to CHT. No difference in OCM rates was recorded (hazard ratio, 1.25; P = .2).CONCLUSION: Surveillance and CHT use rates increased while RPLND decreased in the last two decades. Virtually the same outcomes were recorded between surveillance and AT. However, within AT, RPLND was associated with lower CSM than CHT.

AB - BACKGROUND: Historical data demonstrated similar survival outcomes in patients with stage I nonseminoma germ-cell tumor of the testis (NSGCTT) subjected to either surveillance or active treatment (AT) after orchiectomy. However, data with long-term follow-up are unavailable. We tested contemporary treatment rates and their effect on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and other-cause mortality (OCM) relative to surveillance, as well as after stratification between chemotherapy (CHT) versus retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND).PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified patients with stage I NSGCTT with initial orchiectomy within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1988-2015). Subsequent surveillance versus CHT versus RPLND use rates were reported. Cumulative incidence plots and multivariable competing-risks regression (CRR) models were used after propensity score (PS) matching. These tests first compared surveillance versus AT (CHT vs. RPLND) and subsequently CHT versus RPLND.RESULTS: Of 5034 patients with stage I NSGCTT, 61.2%, 24.9%, and 13.9%, respectively, underwent surveillance, CHT, and RPLND. Between 1988 and 2015, surveillance (estimated annual percentage change [EAPC]: +1.1%, P < .001) and CHT (EAPC: +2.3%, P < .001) rates increased. RPLND rates decreased (EAPC: -5.7%; P < .001). After PS matching, CRR models failed to identify AT as an independent predictor of lower mortality relative to surveillance. However, after PS matching, CRR models identified RPLND as an independent predictor of lower CSM (hazard ratio, 0.26; P = .002) relative to CHT. No difference in OCM rates was recorded (hazard ratio, 1.25; P = .2).CONCLUSION: Surveillance and CHT use rates increased while RPLND decreased in the last two decades. Virtually the same outcomes were recorded between surveillance and AT. However, within AT, RPLND was associated with lower CSM than CHT.

KW - Adult

KW - Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use

KW - Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/statistics & numerical data

KW - Follow-Up Studies

KW - Humans

KW - Lymph Node Excision/statistics & numerical data

KW - Male

KW - Neoplasm Staging

KW - Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/mortality

KW - Orchiectomy

KW - Propensity Score

KW - Retroperitoneal Space/surgery

KW - Retrospective Studies

KW - Risk Assessment

KW - SEER Program/statistics & numerical data

KW - Survival Rate

KW - Testicular Neoplasms/mortality

KW - Testis/pathology

KW - United States/epidemiology

KW - Watchful Waiting/statistics & numerical data

KW - Young Adult

U2 - 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.08.009

DO - 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.08.009

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 31515197

VL - 17

SP - e1153-e1162

JO - CLIN GENITOURIN CANC

JF - CLIN GENITOURIN CANC

SN - 1558-7673

IS - 6

ER -